How on earth can people say he’s better defensively than Maatsan? He’s played a game and a half and already produced the worst bit of defending I’ve seen all season.
Not writing him off but can’t see what you lot have seen to suggest he’s a better defender than Maatsan yet.
If you think that's the worst bit of defending you've seen all season, I'd suggest re-watching back the Luton away highlights.How on earth can people say he’s better defensively than Maatsan? He’s played a game and a half and already produced the worst bit of defending I’ve seen all season.
Not writing him off but can’t see what you lot have seen to suggest he’s a better defender than Maatsan yet.
If you think that's the worst bit of defending you've seen all season, I'd suggest re-watching back the Luton away highlights.
That was an odd absolute disastrous night thankfully has turned to be a one off.If you think that's the worst bit of defending you've seen all season, I'd suggest re-watching back the Luton away highlights.
Either Dabo hasn’t been fit since his injury in L1, or he’s not stepped up like many thought he would.
If you think that's the worst bit of defending you've seen all season, I'd suggest re-watching back the Luton away highlights.
Think some of us forget just how good Dabo has been for us. Until his injury,he was one of the first names on the team sheet.
He has had some mamoth performances, he will come good again.
5 assists for kane ? How many has O’Hare got our superstar ? @Grendel
5 assists for kane ? How many has O’Hare got our superstar ? @Grendel
Surprised peoples comments about Dabo, yes hes been poor this season, but last year he was one of our main attacking outlets.
He has 4 the same as him
He’s also a right backPlayed almost twice as many games.
He has 4 the same as him
Well, he'll be an upgrade on all of them next season, when they're not at the club. Less loans means less worrying whether we can match like-with-like the following season.oN Bidwell: He may be pemanent, but is he an upgrade on the three loans, Sam Mac, Ryan Giles and Maatsen? Unlikely.
Its 5 for Kane according to the BBC.
Wrong.Well, he'll be an upgrade on all of them next season, when they're not at the club. Less loans means less worrying whether we can match like-with-like the following season.
We're in control of what happens to the permanent contracts at the end of the season. Ergo, we can guarantee we have a player for that position of a certain level, that we can choose to try and upgrade... or not.Wrong.
Loans are an absolutely essential part of the mix. Usually among the best players in the team and freshen up the squad. They are also a flexible & low risk source with potential for long term recruitment (O'Hare, Sheaf, Gyokeres). We needed all 5 last season to stay up - James did us a great job. I think majority opinion would like us to hang onto C-S. An ex-loanee fits in more easily than a new player and they are good for positions that are tricky to fill - like leftsided ones.
Anyway, the longevity of contracted players is considerably over-exagerated. The current players regularly featuring - by years. In brackets - first team regulars.
5 (1)Kelly & Shipley (both barely featuring) and Hyam
4 (0) None
3 (4) Allen, McFadz O'Hare (loan) , Godden, Dabo, Rose, Wilson
2 (3) Gyokeres (loan), Hamer, Sheaf (loan), Eccles, [Walker]
1 (6) Moore, Bidwell, Kane, Clarke-Salter (loan), Maatsen (loan), Waghorn (assuming he was fit),
11/21 recruited in the last 2 years. And it's not just because our promotions have demanded a lot of upgrades. This level of turnover is essential to keep afloat.
Fans want continuity and new players at the same time. Discuss.
Interesting and fair points.Wrong.
Loans are an absolutely essential part of the mix. Usually among the best players in the team and freshen up the squad. They are also a flexible & low risk source with potential for long term recruitment (O'Hare, Sheaf, Gyokeres). We needed all 5 last season to stay up - James did us a great job. I think majority opinion would like us to hang onto C-S. An ex-loanee fits in more easily than a new player and they are good for positions that are tricky to fill - like leftsided ones.
Anyway, the longevity of contracted players is considerably over-exagerated. The current players regularly featuring - by years. In brackets - first team regulars.
5 (1)Kelly & Shipley (both barely featuring) and Hyam
4 (0) None
3 (4) Allen, McFadz O'Hare (loan) , Godden, Dabo, Rose, Wilson
2 (3) Gyokeres (loan), Hamer, Sheaf (loan), Eccles, [Walker]
1 (6) Moore, Bidwell, Kane, Clarke-Salter (loan), Maatsen (loan), Waghorn (assuming he was fit),
11/21 recruited in the last 2 years. And it's not just because our promotions have demanded a lot of upgrades. This level of turnover is essential to keep afloat.
Fans want continuity and new players at the same time. Discuss.
Why is it unlikely? He has over 300 games in the championship, 450 games in total and still in his prime, whilst there will be elements those players may be better than him of course he is an upgrade on Sam Mac, Giles and Maatsen. He has proven championship quality. They may develop in time into much better players like Van Aarnholt, Henderson, etc, but they may also decline like Sterry, Bright, etcoN Bidwell: He may be pemanent, but is he an upgrade on the three loans, Sam Mac, Ryan Giles and Maatsen? Unlikely.
Yes, because he is permanentoN Bidwell: He may be pemanent, but is he an upgrade on the three loans, Sam Mac, Ryan Giles and Maatsen? Unlikely.
Anyway, the longevity of contracted players is considerably over-exagerated. The current players regularly featuring - by years. In brackets - first team regulars.
5 (1)Kelly & Shipley (both barely featuring) and Hyam
4 (0) None
3 (4) Allen, McFadz O'Hare (loan) , Godden, Dabo, Rose, Wilson
2 (3) Gyokeres (loan), Hamer, Sheaf (loan), Eccles, [Walker]
1 (6) Moore, Bidwell, Kane, Clarke-Salter (loan), Maatsen (loan), Waghorn (assuming he was fit),
Agree but I think it is unlikely McCallum and Maatsen won't play at a higher level. Possibly even Giles.Why is it unlikely? He has over 300 games in the championship, 450 games in total and still in his prime, whilst there will be elements those players may be better than him of course he is an upgrade on Sam Mac, Giles and Maatsen. He has proven championship quality. They may develop in time into much better players like Van Aarnholt, Henderson, etc, but they may also decline like Sterry, Bright, etc
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Maatsen probably will, I'm not convinced with McCallum tbf.Agree but I think it is unlikely McCallum and Maatsen won't play at a higher level. Possibly even Giles.
Reminds of Chris Stokes. In a good way. Solid and dependable. Think he will improve offensively once he settles in. Also last night was generally a very risk averse line up for the first hour.
Just caught up with this. Rule number one don’t disrespect a club legend - especially infront of the owner/anyone else.Google Chris Marsden Billy Wright
He’s been in the door 2 weeks you melt3 & half year contract ?
Same as last weeks goal mate can’t be arsed to get goal sideHe’s been in the door 2 weeks you melt
Just utter shite as per usualSame as last weeks goal mate can’t be arsed to get goal side
What you on about?Same as last weeks goal mate can’t be arsed to get goal side
He just talks complete and utter gibberishWhat you on about?
He should of tracked his man same as last week game let his man get to the ball firstWhat you on about?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?