Search results

  1. skybluetony176

    More to the point

    They have a short stay of execution at Brandon and have identified a site with the aid of RBC as far as I understand that they're working on now. If no further extensions happen at Brandon they'll track share at Leicester in the interim.
  2. skybluetony176

    More to the point

    No need to steal it, you can have it :)
  3. skybluetony176

    Graeme Hawley's comments

    Thought he was bang on tonight. If you haven't heard it it's well worth listening to on the I player.
  4. skybluetony176

    NOPM

    "made the playoffs under SISU" I thought SISU wasn't the club? You seem quite happy to give SISU credit if we achieved that but because while we're sitting bottom it's all the managers fault and nothing to do with SISU. There's that duality of yours again.
  5. skybluetony176

    More to the point

    It ain't going to happen Northern. They're a demolition company not a building company. Simple as.
  6. skybluetony176

    NOPM

    Is all you come on for is to have a go at our fan base? Seriously. What are you for?
  7. skybluetony176

    the phone in 23/9

    Graham Hawley should be on every week. He can take the Juggy spot ;) Never heard him talk about CCFC before. Sound as a pound.
  8. skybluetony176

    the phone in 23/9

    Well said Graham Hawley.
  9. skybluetony176

    the phone in 23/9

    Graham Hawley on now.
  10. skybluetony176

    the phone in 23/9

    Making the point of saying the owners won't talk to CWR again. They really are devoid of responsibility for the club. SISU that is, not CWR.
  11. skybluetony176

    Telegraph have been banned from Ryton

    Listening to the phone in SISU really haven't gained a dot by doing this. They're not talking to anyone anyway. Stuart publicly challenging them to come on the phone in to answer the questions fans keep asking. Presumably when they invite them privately they get no reply.
  12. skybluetony176

    Telegraph have been banned from Ryton

    Unless there's questions that need asking that the owners don't want to hear or answer.
  13. skybluetony176

    the phone in 23/9

    BG isn't happy.
  14. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    Richardson at least found a site. This could be worse, much much worse.
  15. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    Nice to see we're on the same page. For a change ;) The clubs statement gives me no confidence that we're going to be moving to a brand new spangly training ground and this is going to be a huge step forward for the club and it's infrastructure. I'm guessing you're feeling the same way too?
  16. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    The other question is does these alterative pitches have to make up the training ground. It's quite possible that the club could put two random pitches somewhere in the borough satisfying RBC and sports England that no playing surfaces have been lost but not for the training ground at the...
  17. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    It makes you look a cock with an ulterior motive. Nothing to do with wasps whatsoever so why bring them up?
  18. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    That's the way I read it but that could be my misinterpretation. I thought it was saying it was a loss of sports facilities in RBC area therefore the replacement also has to be in the RBC area.
  19. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    Oh do fuck of with trying to continually pointing the finger in Wasps direction. Have you managed to make a post on this thread yet without mentioning them? This has nothing to do with wasps whatsoever. Why are you trying to change the story? What purpose does it serve you?
  20. skybluetony176

    Selling the training ground

    Wouldn't that go against RBC and Sports England wanting the pitches replacing at a separate location first? The Higgs is existing, also not in the Rugby Borough.
Top