Search results

My excuse is not "King was poor at first." my point was it took King around 15 games before we saw the best of him, still a not match fit King was still a good player at this level and not poor. My point is more simply we are yet to see the best of Mcdonald.

Yes he got chances against Ipswich but that was more down to poor defending on there behalf, in the other 2 games he barely had a sniff of goal. I don't think we should be writing him off to early, he isn't match fit and last year with King we saw how important match fitness was as he didn't...

To the people who thinks he is better than or as good as Westwood --->:laugh: Westwood used to get us out of jail at least a couple of times a game, to the fella who said he had a refusal to role it out surely that instruction comes from the manager and considering we had Boothroyd in charge...

I think he played well today but on 2 or 3 occasions he should have took the shot but kept twisting in the area.

They have done the same for the last few home games.

I though there were around 9000-9500 ST holders?

I thought Hussey played well. Took his man on alot and managed to get past him a good few times today. We didn't see a constant supply of deep over hit crosses like we have recently.

Yea it was wrong :facepalm: I don't know what station it was as I just heard it in passing as I was leaving for the game, I might have misheard but I was am pretty sure that is what they said.

I thought this too at half time, it is only a matter of time before someone takes a tumble stretching to catch one of those footballs.

It was his best game of the season, I think Mcsheffrey playing well took a lot of the weight off him. He is not suited to play in the hole as he has been doing this season imo, he is more suited to the position he played today.

We started off well with the early goal which was a great goal from Mcsheffrey after a good pass from Bell. 10 mins in we concede with sloppy defending, for the rest of the half it was pretty even with neither side having many clear sights of goal. Reading could consider them self unlucky not to...

He was brilliant today, that was the Mcsheffrey we saw at the end of last season under Thorn. Was our best player today imo. He was running and committing defenders, ran the channels well, supported the strikers well and read there knock downs. Managed to find lots of space behind the strikers...

Oh yea forgot about his injury :facepalm: Anyway just heard on the radio Keogh is going to RB and Wood will partner Cranie at CB.

I think we could benefit with switching to 4-3-3 me I would go with ----------------Murphy Keogh--Cameron--Cranie--Hussey ----------------Clingan ----------Gael----------Bell -Baker----------Juke----------Mcsheffery BENCH: Dunn, Christie, Thomas, Mcdonald, Eastwood

It doesn't really sound like SISU are blocking any move, more the right player isn't available or at the right price. We know nothing about the loan budget given to Thorn, bearing in mind that most "experience" premiership reserves are probably on 20k p/w it goes without saying most championship...

If you lose 3-0 it is not the strikers fault, you shouldn't have to score 4 goals to win a game.

No Liverpool have spent 100 million pound since January. Liverpool have had an ok start, we have had a terrible start.

I am happy Mcpake was offered a new deal, if he can get fit he is a good defender. Can't say I was thrilled about David Bell though.

Depends what time you need to arrive at the airport at. If you leave the match 10 mins early to miss the traffic it takes about 20-30 mins to get to the airport I think.

Don't know much about him but if other champ clubs are interested why would he choose us?