Search results

No, you just decided he was a shit journalist because he wasn't writing what you want to hear. You guys love Simon because he feeds the popular anti-SISU ego.

There's a whole host of reasons to hate the council before you even get to the CCFC situation.

I remember when McGinnity tried to change the badge. The new one was fucking hideous. How he thought fans would be up for that shows how out of touch he was.

An amount of those have to be homegrown players, and that amount will remain the same with 4 less places for non-British players.

You've got Mr Coventry to thank for that one...

I think it is a perfectly sensible idea. We do have to accept though that any owners will be looking to make some money for themselves if possible. But if the club is successful on the pitch it will happen naturally.

And your point??? Although not personally been on the end of it, Michael has given plenty of grief to people that do buy into the KCIC manifesto. Just ask him.

Or maybe Michael began the thread with his latest ramblings??

Michael you've repeatedly tried to discredit the work of others whilst lauding up your own campaign. Try appreciating other peoples viewpoints instead of giving them grief because they don't buy into yours.

Unbelievable - you sound like a politician.

Would you not think minutes would be relevant on a decision like this?

John I think you're confused, that's what the Council QC said.

That's what Simon said on his tweet... Live from the courtroom. Though there may have been individual councillors notes.

If I want to claim back a fiver expenses from my work I have to complete a form with details and receipt. But spending £14m isn't worth making any notes on????

So just to be clear, the meeting where £14m of taxpayers money was agreed to be spent - was NOT minuted. Just let that sink in for a few seconds before you gasp at the ineptness.

Given your 3 points you've raised and we've discussed - your maillot would suggest that point 3 is the most pertinent to you... When it fact point 1 is for me far more important.

Police costs could never have been included in the rent could they? If we didn't pay rent for nearly a year - and said rent included policing costs, we would have never been allowed to host our league games.

I agree with the first 2 - and partly agree with the third. The plan to get the club on a sound financial footing is a good one, but the execution has been abysmal.

I'd welcome it as well. I think we all would. In fact I'd like to see everything from a club perspective from about 1995 onwards. Perhaps you can lobby CCC/ACL to pursue this, as they clearly felt the admin process was flawed, seeing as that was the reason we were deducted 10 points. Lets get...

Apparently they have been asking for this from the start of the process. As someone has already said, they probably know what is in there, but want it put in the public domain.