Search results

Using the ACL example - SISU are going to value it at a minimum of £40m given the monies owed to them surely?

Gary Hoffman back in the mix..... £1's all round! :D

I believe that is correct - and some that are over 21 too - depending on the notion of 'homegrown' - but I don't think that lasts forever.

Question for Simon if he's reading this. Don't you think it would be a good idea for the CET to get an independent body to value the Ricoh Arena complex? I'm sure your readers would take great interest in the findings and might help us to shed some light further on all this.

There is a clear difference between 'could not' and 'chose not'. You're implying that by having less revenue they were stopped from offering him a contract, which of course is not true.

FFP is not the easiest to define to be honest, but I do think there are some key points that are being overlooked here. This is an important one - and one that is probably most salient given the nature of the dispute between the parties. 2.The distinction between non-football operations...

I was referring to physical assets (as in they don't own the stadium). So what form do these assets take?

So say if SISU had bought the Higgs share in 2012 for £5.5m would they have paid just that and taken on 50% of the mortgage on ACL? I guess what I'm trying to ask is that if I sell my house for 200K it is worth the same amount regardless of whether I have £150k or £10k mortgage. Dependent on...

So does CCC value their 50% share as zero or ACL as a whole (including the Higgs part)?

Apologies if already covered, but if the council valued ACL as 'zero net value' then surely a £14m loan to a business with no value makes no sense? It is even more complicated/confusing because ACL have no assets other than a long term lease...

Maybe dollars give you a better conversion to the Nigerian Naira

Without question.

It was a tongue in cheek comment, not referring to any inaccuracies. Incidentally - what's the thought process behind the story... Are you not at all sceptical??

Maybe it beats reporting actual factual information.

If the club choose to fund the squad with equity they can. So the point on FFP is moot. Additionally equity injected cannot be added to the debt.

Who cares?

CCFC have made a loss every year they've been here. So one would assume in a similar way as before. Except now any money they inject into the club is as a donation, so can't end up as debt.

Can't see Elliott and Hoffman scraping together £30 - never mind £30m. Hoffman - White Dhinsa

Please... some of us want to eat tonight... and not just those two.

Apart from some clarification of the 'revenue streams' and what that means for the club, I think that's a perfectly plausible and sensible idea.