Search results

So the question is - if the club is legitimately owed the money, are SISU justified in trying to claim it back, or would people prefer ACL/CCC to have it because no one likes SISU?

As far as I'm concerned the two of them can shove their 'confidentiality agreements' up their arses. What goes around comes around Gentlemen....

ACL had decided on their preferred administrator, he was on CWR a couple of days before. SISU beat them to the punch by putting Ltd into admin - that's when they chose Appleton.

Think he needs to decide if he's a defender or a midfielder. Seems to fall a bit in the middle. Personally I think if he worked on his end product he'd make a damn good wide midfielder.

If he does - just epitomises everything wrong with modern day football.

I agree that actions will have far more of an impact that any fan forum ever could. The owners have a huge job of re-engaging the fan base after the mess of the last few years. The best way is to start delivering something tangible for us all to see in getting the club back to Coventry one...

If Cyrus ever has designs on playing top level football then the MLS is the last place he should go.

Surely a series of small scale fans meetings is the way to go. That way you stand a better chance of getting your questions heard (maybe not always answered) As soon as it becomes large scale there will be someone that tries to derail the meeting and it just becomes a circus of abuse and...

It is anything but straightforward.

How exactly do you come to that conclusion??

I fail to see any point that could remotely justify it's rejection. If they were unhappy with the process, they should have reported Appleton to the appropriate authorities.

Things might be a lot clearer of Appleton came out and explained exactly why the original admin/liquidation is not finished yet.

But surely the 'value' of the golden share is obsolete as once the club goes into admin/liquidation it is in essence revoked and returned to FL? That's certainly how I understood it.

So why and how would they benefit from a liquidation? There would be no purpose unless there was a benefit surely?

There is not to this day a single justification for ACL rejecting the CVA.

So if you didn't say it - why are you taking me to task about my comments? I think the idea SISU will liquidate the club is nonsense, and if you think similar picking me up on it makes no sense.

You don't believe him when he says he's going to build a new stadium - but you do believe when he says he's going to liquidate the club. I guess it depends which one suits your argument.

How is it a false argument? I agree with you that the argument for a new stadium doesn't really stand up - but I would apply the same logic to the idea that they will consciously liquidate a club. They have virtually no assets. The golden share would not be counted in the calculations, so it is...

So you don't believe a single word Fisher says normally - but this one, you're all into it to the letter. My point is that there was no direct statement - saying 'we will liquidate club' - it was said foolishly in my opinion, in some way to provoke a reaction from the other parties involved...

I'm sorry but describing something that could occur as a result of the club's poor financial health is not the same as saying you will do it yourself.