Search results

3 signings? A tough target man in the Mick Harford mould. A proper second striker ala Tommy Johnson, so we can shove Chaplin a little further forward. A back-up to Bayliss. Our downturn in form has coincided with his absence.

Or Chris Hussey. IIRC he had a game midweek somewhere at left mid and play like he'd never seen a ball before.

Perhaps that's why he bought him. If Robins can get him playing with effort then perhaps he has the attributes to be a top player. A gamble for sure, but that's where we are as a club - playing the odds.

As a huge fallout fan, I'm sad to say the new one looks dodgy. Watched a handful of lengthy youtube videos of the beta, and graphically it was poor, the control mechanics weren't optimised, and the AI was gash - enemies spawning behind your back in an instant. I get that it's meant to be MMO so...

Enjoyable series, young man. You should be proud of yourself for producing such quality content. Informative and entertaining. Keep up the good work.

Perhaps we'll see a supersub soon. We need a kick up the backside.

It was coming. Shame.

I like Grimmer. He looks a good player at this level. But Sterling (on current form) looks better, and you have to play your best players as much as possible, subject to fitting in with the team. Now if it was a straight choice between fitting either Jones or Thomas into the team, I'd find that...

I let my daughter have a play last night. She punched my horse in the face, then gave a woman a lift home and then shotgunned her in the back to loot her corpse. I wasn't sure if I should be proud or horrified.

Shipley on. The game's in the bag now.

Disallowed. Thank goodness. And a red! Miller off. Deliberate handball.

Oops. Game on.

Hiwula! 3-1

Deuces up. Chappers grabs our 2nd.

Almost a second. JCH forces a corner.

Up to the dizzy heights of 7th as things stand.

Get in! JCH from a #Doyler corner

I think it was Aidy Boothroyd who said 2 points per game gets you automatic promotion, 1.6 gets you playoffs. If we win on Tuesday we'll hit that 1.6 mark.

Well the attached suggests I was correct. Not sure how it's a 'silly' comparison - we're aiming to improve on the last time we were in this division, and we have on a points per game basis, but not to an outstanding degree. How is that wrong / negative?

The season we went down we had 18 points after 15 games (1.2 points per game) We've reached that after 13 games this time around (1.38 points per game), so an improvement, but not an incredible one.