Search results

Yes, but every time they go quiet it seems new rumors or new information about rent offers pops up.

Is that the whole pitch for rent? Organic green wall-to-wall carpet.

I think it was £1.2m per year, but they decided not to to pay it any more.

True - so either there's other strings attached or sisu is still trying to bleed out ACL or they are so fed up with CCC/ACL that no deal but a complete takeover of the Ricoh is acceptable.

Exactly - so the question should be: Is ACL prepared to make the rent offer on 3-4 year lease and would the club gain any access to additional matchday income.

Interesting - but were there no conditions? Like maybe - minimum 10 year lease. Or - Withdraw the JR. Or both. If an offer is to good to be true ...

Yes - although I do believe there's an earlier interview where he says much the same thing. but this will do - just scroll down to question 9 and read. There is the basis for the JR explained in pretty simple terms even I can understand.

It's what they base the entire JR on ...

Doesn't it depend just a little bit on what new information comes out? There was a lot of strong calls for the administrator to investigate deep into the actions of present and former ccfc directors. So naturally we welcome an investigation into this part of the mess too?

I think you miss the point - if ACL's owners (CCC and Higgs) had agreed to the plan to distress the YB mortgage then why/how would ACL have a case against sisu?

No - not that one. Think it was an interview with TF.

Does anyone have a link to the CT article where TF told how distressing the Yorkshire Bank mortgage was a 'joint plan' (CCC/sisu)? I think this part is center point for sisu in the JR. Apparantly CCC and sisu agreed sisu should buy the mortgage at a discount (and then discharge it) as a prelude...

I think that is a pretty accurate call. I was actually going to give your post a like till I read the end: 'heaven for bid are promoted' Really? You don't want the team promoted?

Then I think sisu will have grounds to sue for damages.

Maybe there's a clue in the name: Sky Blue TRUST?

So what has changed? Maybe the fact the lease to ACL was finally broken? If we want to ever Again play at the Ricoh we are barking up the wrong tree. Standing on a hill won't change anything. As long as CCC refuse to sell either the freehold or their shares in ACL to the Club we are not...

But didn't sisu ask for a three year run-off to the last deal offered by ACL prior to going into administration? And wasn't it rejected flat out by ACL?

Hey! Leave me out of this! ... and Godiva too.

I remember it was said sometimes ago ... before administration. Around February I think.

I am blessed to know very little about the practice of politics - to be honest most I know is from 'House of Cards' (what a TV series that was!!!). But when I read the clubs statement earlier I wondered why it had to include all the non-essential stuff from the drawers of 'he said -she said'...