Search results

Perhaps he's inferring some influence... ;) Imagine if someone who was until recently involved with CCFC happened to be on the Trinity Mirror board.... :whistle:

I would be surprised if they leaked the result before the judge announces it, so I personally don't read anything into it yet. However may be interesting if the KCIC offer thing moves along over the weekend - that may be more indicative.

Perhaps if some fucking relevant terms had been set out properly - as in how the deal will actually work, is structured, are things in agreement on ACL's side etc then we wouldn't be here right now would we? What's the next preferred method of communication - Will Michael nip onto Chat Roulette...

Might be helpful if Michael actually came on here and gave an update. Unless he's decided that the internet is no longer a suitable form of communication.

I'm not criticising directly.... if the media route is the chosen way to go you've got to have all your details to hand when people will inevitably pick at it. This is why I now think a closed door discussion might be more pertinent at this point - especially given the impending JR result.

The more I think about it the more I wish I didn't know about this. If we put the offer to buy aside for one moment, then the rent offer could be a good deal, and could finally engage the parties in some meaningful discussion, even if the original offer is never taken up. The problem is that as...

Virtually every fan is behind it... But you seem to take an issue with the fact people have sensibly asked for some clarification. It's you that has 'got their knickers in a twist' As I said previously - if the deal is as good as it is made out to be, then clarifying a few points will be...

Just like the free rent whilst in admin, the Hoffman deal or the 400K deal (expiring after 3 years of course.)? Scratch the surface and you see the finer details omitted from the headlines. If the deal is really that amazing (lets hope it is) - then clarifying the detail and answering the...

Both - the two can easily co-exist together. That said if we lose all our players to international call-ups when we have a crucial away tie at Rochdale - that could change.

He's asking a sensible question which ultimately is fundamental to whether this offer could actually happen - yet you choose to deride it with a childish retort.

Hoffman's offer was a pile of shit for everyone except him of course. He decided to see if he could make a few quid out of an emotive situation, pretending to give a fuck about our club. Him and Elliott are the same - full to the brim of shit yet zero substance.

Byng said all along he was only interested if the club and stadium were one entity. If that was to occur then maybe he would take his interest a bit further.

I miss the Yellow one - best away kit we've had in years.

Have only just had a chance to see this all day.. a few thoughts (apologies if they have been covered) The ownership offer - It was always going to be a non-starter. Putting in additional amounts to symbolise 1987 and 35 just make the offer look petty and ridiculous. The rent offer is...

I agree... Unless what was agreed by the handshake changed by the time the formal offer came through. God knows...

You asked a question - I tried to answer. Just because I think something is good, doesn't mean my boss will agree with my idea does it? And let's be honest... They signed a draft HOT agreement which neither followed through on. What makes you think a handshake holds any weight either way?

The only obvious reason that springs to mind is that she wasn't happy with other aspects - namely revenue streams. Which is ultimately a far bigger issue than the price of the rent.

I get the impression they counter-claimed to get more information out in the public domain.

Agree it should have been done then. Even so now the FL could just state what the deal was to clear any confusion. I'm just starting to wonder if it was agreed as a good-will gesture rather than anything contractually agreed or signed on.

Clearly more interested in trampling on each other in the race to the top.