Search results

They will make far more money with footballing success on the field then they ever will elsewhere at the Ricoh.

Do you think it would be appropriate to attend the march and then if Joe Elliott or Gary Hoffman show up then give them a drop kick for being two faced cunts?

Did I say it was?

Maybe this would be another stumbling block. If SISU had part of ACL they wouldn't be using the profits (their share at least) to pay down the mortgage would they. To be fair you wouldn't expect any owner to do that if the money was there to put into the football club.

They must be a little pissed at the fact there is no football team there.

Would hate Fleck to go.

I guess the problem lies in the fact that we have had zero information from the liquidator. SISU claim that they have put money in the ESCROW account to cover the payment. Has the liquidation now been officially completed? What stage is the process at if not. I can't fathom why a) the FL don't...

Micheal - Of course the revenue streams are important.. they are certainly far more important than the rent value ultimately. Yes we can see that SISU's actions were to try and distress ACL - but the purpose of that was to access those revenue streams.. and in particular the non-matchday ones...

IIRC she lost her seat at the May elections.

Maybe Michael should disclose every possible detail of the rent offer and put it out there to see. If it is as good as made out then there becomes a focus point which to campaign/protest on and also more information to be supplied to the Football League. If the objective is to show the owners...

A football club controlling it's own financial destiny by accessing the revenue streams it helps to generate. Promoting youth players into the first team to create a sustainable flow of players. All good ideas - However as I said the way they gone about trying to doing it is fucking abysmal.

They may have a point with some of their ideas but their execution is fucking terrible.

Petrasso on loan would be an excellent addition.

It's an idea - not claiming to be a perfect one either. Clearly you don't agree - just come out and say so.

I get the impression that he wants athletes. He made a big thing in the early part of last season about our fitness being superior to other teams. Maybe this is why he let Adams go as he doesn't think he is.

That's what I meant - sorry for any confusion

After pitch sit in would make a very good visual point - would have to be at a home game though. Would people be prepared to break the no home games philosophy if the intent was to do this and just stay there for several hours??

I think what you've highlighted are fair points and there would need to be some clear definitions set in regards to each. It actually highlights the complexities that would exist in this kind of relationship, even if things were all fine between the parties. Perhaps if CCFC/ACL could get some...

Seems to me you are happy to deviate away from my point rather than answer it directly. Asking questions is significantly different from something being illegal. To this day no one has legally challenged to admin process - probably because there is nothing to challenge. So I'll say...

If we don't turn up with the intent to win then why turn up at all.