The council has an obligation to protect its assets. It has no obligation to a private business, ACL should be applauded for not evicting their non paying tenant months ago.
Some of the debt was written off, most was just transfered to Sisu. Which I don't actually have a problem with, but Ranson should have been honest about this from day 1.
We repeatedly hear that sisu have put in £45m, and that we should be grateful for that.
In any other business, if the owner invested £45m and actually made the company substantially worse, would you not think they were incompetent?
<p>
Is that not exactly the reason why sisu should have asked acl for help rather than making demands in the style of a 2 year old?
Act with some humility and they would have had a lot more support.
I've never said £1.2m was a fair rent. I have no problem with the club ASKING for a reduction, and accepting that the club is in this mess because of it's own actions over the last 10-15 years.
If they went to ACL and asked for help, whilst accepting that ACL were under no legal obligation to...
Exactly. Our crowds are 5000 above the 'average league 1' (to quote Tim Fisher), which at an average ticket price of £15 equates to £1.72m.
It must be compulsory at other clubs to buy an overpriced pie.