Search results

Pretty much everybody generally!

I'm going to have an extreme makeover.

Would have been Sisu's problem not the local taxpayers if they hadn't negotiated a better deal, they may well have been able to do one better than CCC managed, but never know now. Regardless, there is still the outstanding loan now that CCC are on the hook for.

We know what you're up to Fisher. Arrange to meet all opposition together under the guise of a friendly meeting, expect want to meet up in a local garage, on Valentines Day, for instance. I'm not turning up to get massacred by Sisu Tommy Guns.

That would have been Sisu's problem what price they negotiated with YB, now of course it's the local taxpayers problem, supporting a private enterprise owned by a hedge-fund. I believe Higgs turned down the proposal. Would you not say that what was offered was better than what actually transpired?

Unless it's like Pressley's honeymoon period..

They would have bought the loan off YB, thereby removing any risk to taxpayers, offered £4.5million to Higgs(£1.5 million cash, and £4million over 10 years, CCC thought the offer was "significantally above market value"), and extend the lease to 125 years. That was for just for the 50% Higgs...

Well they did propose a deal that was better for CCC and Higgs than was received from Wasps.

You seem to be inferring that the court was presented with misleading information concerning the financials of ACL by CCC in order to help their case in the JR.

Should not Wasps now repay the loan in full to CCC, and arrange their own financing? I believe that a large part of the judgment in the JR was that CCC were justified in giving the loan to ACL in order to protect their investment from a predatory hedge fund? Now that CCC have nothing to do...

Sidestepping? Fucking hell, all you've done since the thread was started, by nice Mr Gilbert of the Telegraph. Have you forgotten, or perhaps maybe didn't understand, what the title of this thread is? "Council admits Ricoh Arena was not sustainable without CCFC". Maybe if you stopped...

I'm still laughing at being called a condescending c**t by you, like being accused of being a little Englander by Nigel Farage.

There were no extraordinary charges for legal costs in the accounts, though again it doesn't stop you making up a £400,000 figure up earlier. Your figures are just an "elusion", and all is confusion.

As hardly seen a game the last couple of seasons haven't felt able to comment too much on him, either when he was the second coming last season, or shite when first took over, and now. This league is fucking awful, and if unable to get a decent run of results in this league, with whatever...

Wouldn't mind if we did sell players at a profit, most we pay for, pay them a load of wages, then fuck them off for nothing.

"Stephen Hawking goes past Fleck" is one I expect to see soon.

Was more than just rent though, all the match-day income would be a considerable amount of the turnover too I'd have thought, especially as the IEC figures are incorporated into ACL's now(which I think accounts for the pretty much doubled turnover for the last couple of years than previously).

Saying that ACL made profits every year except the one when CCFC weren't playing there and not thinking it relevant is spinning to the extreme. Of course the Spinmeister General then brings up the huge legal fees that poor old ACL had to pay out, fees paid by the loser, SIsu, so irrelevant. So...

That would equate to closer to £1.6million lost then due to Cov being away?

After a £700,000 profit the previous year, it looks more like £1.1million lost during the year Cov were away.