Search results

It's about the only post from you I've seen for ages that doesn't mention "unencumbered freehold" and "the judge said in the JR".

I thought that just caring about the club was being selfish? Maybe I misunderstood the years of posts on here about Sisu ripping off a charity by not wanting to pay them £10million and wanting to protect a community asset from a hedge-fund? It's almost like people don't really have any...

Think you'll find that Duffer, and Chiefdave banged on almost exclusively against Sisu and were pro-CCC for years. They, like pretty much everybody, are still Anti-Sisu, but have, after the whole Wasps thing, and some subsequent revelations, decided that maybe others have a few questions to...

Nobody in Bolton calls it the Macron, let alone elsewhere!

Would they have paid as much for naming rights as Reebok did though? Just think that the value of stadium naming rights would decrease after the initial sponsor.

The media can mention Macron stadium as much as they like, most are going to go "Eh?", then when somebody says "Bolton", say, "oh, the Reebok".

Do you actually read your site Nick??

I'm not convinced that there is a lot of value in sponsoring a stadium anywhere if you are different from the initial sponsor. Ricoh will be in the minds of pretty much everybody for many years to come, no matter who gains the next naming rights. Bolton, I think Reebock, Huddersfield, I think...

Does he have an agenda against CCC?

Thank Christ for that!

Been appealing for oral years. Not done me any good though, thinking of taking up yoga.

Not 500 k profit every year though is it? Would assume that reserves are kept in some sort of interest yielding account? Hopefully not Icelandic! To be fair, think CCC avoided that particular one.

Ray Ranson is still a hero to many.

Would they now have any justification in getting a loan through prudential borrowing to then loan to a totally private company?

Was at the same meeting as NW, don't recall, but to be honest he was going on for so long I''d decided just to drink and was possibly having a cigarette outside with LAST if he said it.

Which is fair enough. Knocks Davebarts theory right out of the fucking window though.

I'm a lifelong Labour voter, however doesn't mean I shouldn't question something done by a Labour Council if I perceive it to be wrong. Definitely think it wrong that a Labour council should be using public funds to loan to a loss-making private company.

Why was the offer from Sisu less?

Really, advertising them on the radio at £15.00 yesterday?