Search results

It astonishes me the double standards of many on here - on one hand acknowledging the almost comedic quality of Fishers inability to tell the truth, see reality or tow a coherent line, whilst at the same time praising the council for doing the same.

They could of course have let the club purchase the Ricoh before going to Sixfields, or Wasps getting involved, and got a better deal than they eventually got off Wasps, without losing any money in the interim.

So by buying the loan with it not being a profitable enterprise at all put the money at risk?

She does sound a bit queasy from the sounds of those quotes to the Telegraph. Surprised it hasn't got it's own thread with a title of "LIES" or something. Though apparently they're not lies if from CCC or Higgs, but Fisher's favourite, "Standard business practice".

What was the principle that stopped you going to Sixfield? Not wanting to watch a team torn away from its roots perhaps? Not firmly held principles from the looks of it.

However statements from Higgs and the council concerning the rude health and possible valuations of ACL without the club were taken as gospel by many on here, and an example of financial rectictude and openness that the club would do well to follow. Any doubts raised about the veracity of these...

I think a closer look at the duplicity and spin of people involved in the whole saga never goes amiss, you know where you going, you have to know where you're coming from.

To be fair, that was something new. Is there anything in the footylaw blogpost that we don't already know? It's on a par with a "Gray's gone" post. Noticed that the ACL batphone in your place must have been flashing red as soon as Simon Gilberts post went up yesterday.

One thing that Eastwood can stop. Is calling us a fucking franchise.

When Mrs PWKH said in April 2014: You said in a thread:

The claim was that it was growing though after we left, which was never going to be the case.

Didn't Wasps have a veto of some sort?

But you would surely not give your house away for nothing?

Think Pressley and the team do need to know where the goal is, and this might help! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuC5BP8db6w#t=88

Would be a tonic for the whole club if he came back.

Brandy sounds like an American stripper name. I'm in!

Thought McQuoid had gone to be honest, must be the huge impression he has made. Though to be fair though if we make two loan signings permanent, lose one permanent player and a loan player, then we are actually one up on players that are actually owned by the club.

I'd say neutral really, two players who aren't here gone, two players who are here staying.

To be fair I'm only watching it in 30 second chunks, so will take me a while to get through just one.