Search results

So I take it that you were unimpressed with the turnout on Saturday and think it should be disregarded?

Ah, just noticed the "Skip to 8 mins".........

Thanks - happy memories. From about 7.40, if anyone wants a look.

Has to be Gynn's equaliser in the semi-final. In league games probably Nuddy's first goal away to Wimbledon (at Selhurst Park) when we needed to win to stay up.

Why would I bother guessing when I have no interest in the answer?

If it makes you feel any better (and stops you being "amazed" again), I can confirm that it would not be possible for me to have less interest in his identity.

Never understood people doing that. Is it something they grow out of when they reach their teens?

Never having lived in Coventry (my Dad is to blame for my obsession), I don't know this site at all. There were a number of comments about it when it was first suggested a few weeks ago, but putting all anti-SISU or anti- ACL views to one side, how realistic would it be to build a reasonable...

Be gentle with him. If you try to persuade him of anything he gets really upset.....

It appears that the club can't order the new kit until CCFC Ltd has come out of administration. Given that TF has told us on a number of occassions that CCFC Ltd is a "non-trading subsidiary that only has property assets", I have no idea why it should impact on placing an order with a...

Yet you appear to see no contradiction in attempting to persuade me that your view is correct - or to put it another way, to influence me on a view that will have no impact on your life. If you come on a forum, I'd have thought that there was a fairly basic presumption that you would be...

It seems rather pointless expressing an opinion, if there is no attempt to (politely and respectfully) influence others. To consider that to be wrong is, frankly, a little odd. Is this something that you only believe in relation to this matter or is it a general belief of yours?

It's not amazing at all. My post - that you disagreed with - was very short and to the point. It said (here we go again....) that people have a right to express their opinions, but should do so politely and respectfully. I was merely trying to help you to clarify your position.

Personally no, in that scenario I'd have been behind the club. In this case I'm not because: 1) we do not have to leave, we are leaving because of SISU's choice 2) the plan to move to Northampton makes no economic/financial sense and so because of 1) and 2) 3) I am suspicious of what...

So can you simply confirm: Do you believe that people have a right to express an opinion on this matter ( as I said and as I believe) or do you believe that they have no right?

I agree with you all the way. I said at the time that they had a weak legal case, but a strong moral one. Just handled it so very very badly.

I'm a bit confused..... You said that I'm wrong and then you said "by all means express you have an opinion". I'd said "you have every right to express that opinion". So I'm wrong, but you agree with my point?

I can only speak for myself, but the reason that I didn't "rally behind the club when the rent dispute first started" was because of the appalling way SISU handled the "negotiations". At the time, when others were praising SISU's tough negotiating stance, I predicted that it would all end...

Disagree. If you believe that people attending games at Northampton will be to the detriment of your club, then you have every right to express that opinion. Express it politely and respectfully, but express it.

Do you really think that the debt will be written off (i.e. out of the group)? TF has repeatedly said that there is no way the club will play at the Ricoh, so on what grounds do you think that the CVA would change that?