Search results

True - the question is, in which direction? Are the people who come on this site the ones who are more likely to be set against the move to Northampton - so that the no vote % gets overstated, or are they the keener supporters, who might be expected to travel to follow the team more readily...

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Was just looking for Sky Blue Taylor's apology. Not here yet.

Well, to be fair, the Football League like it!

No, it's just you! Try reading it again. SISU/Ptium get to keep half of the "surplus". Part is taken from the other half to cover financing costs and the balance goes to the academy. It's a no lose deal for SISU/Otium - unless what they really want is to distress ACL.....

I wouldn't worry PWKH - I can't believe that anyone on here takes Sky Blue Taylor seriously.

Best that I saw was probably Bill Glazier, although Jim Blyth ran him very close.

I did. It says that all the players who responded to their survey said that they would not attend "home" games if played away from the city.

That was in Ferguson and Wallace season wasn't it. I remember driving up with a couple of mates expecting an easy win. If I remember correctly, we were 2-0 down and a young Garry Thompson scored a late goal for us?

I'd go through a few of the thousands of posts on this site that explain it.

Fisher is a human being??? People do post rubbish on here :)

As you note, SISU "say" they will fund the 3 year plan (that incidentally, already seems to be more of a 5 year plan). In another thread someone reports that Timmy still reckons on getting 3k to 7k for the "home" games. Now if NOPM works and crowds are as low as some people think (in my...

I love it when you talk dirty.....

But as discussed earlier, they didn't seem to have a problem with the council putting funds in when it was going to be half each. Presumably they had some form of damascene conversion.....:whistle:

If I've got this right, Timmy claims that the original deal was for the council and SISU to each buy out half of ACL's bank debt. What actually happened was that the council bought out all of it. SISU then launched their legal action, claiming that this was an illegal act by the council...

Or: The FL disregarding its own rules to bend over backwards for an organisation that has manufactured a dispute to further its own agenda of obtaining a property asset on the cheap. I guess you take your pick....

Give them time - I expect they'll manage to.

I think that the bookies are refusing to take bets on this!

If that is true then..... Well, to be honest, words fail me! If anyone knows who dealt with this for the FL could they please let me have his details - there are some shares in a South American spaghetti farm that I'm sure I can persuade him to invest in! :whistle:

The words "chocolate" and "fireguard" keep floating through my mind.