Search results

If you think that looking at our form over the most recent (almost) four month period is "odd", then fair enough. I'd have thought that it was a fairly relevant indicator as to how things are currently going.

That is true to an extent, but the worrying (if not totally surprising) thing is the way our form has collapsed. If you look at a league table that runs from 1st January, we're one place and one point outside the relegation zone - and that's with no points deduction.

If you feel that the administration process was fully open and transparent, then I would have thought that you were in something of a minority. The position where a legal entity whose accounts had shown it to be a trading football club was suddenly found to be a non-trading property owning...

Not sure how you got that impression!

So they're prepared to effectively turn away 80% - 90% of their "customer base" because "they don't want to rent a stadium". Got to be honest - I find that impossible to understand.

I must have somehow converted "Rankin" to "Garner". Glad he's still with us, was impressed by him in the pre-season game at Nuneaton.

Hasn't Garner been released by the club - or did I dream that?

I'd have thought that best practice would be to spread the revenue recognition over the number of years that the premium related to. Having said that, accountancy is sometimes more of an art than a science :D

Stupot - as you imply, you've repeated that piece of information a number of times. I think that I'm right in saying that your implication is that disconnect between "attendance league position" and "revenue league position" is down to what has become known around these parts as "pie money"...

In my view it would very much depend on their perception of why they had moved. If I believed that we had been forced out of the Ricoh and had no choice but to move, then not only would I be attending Sixfields, I'd probably be buying a couple of extra season tickets as a gesture of solidarity.

He could at least have said they'd have one "in three weeks".

An interesting new policy for the forum. Much as I support it, I'm slightly concerned that it might lead to a massive reduction in posts.... :)

"A better experience to fans". Hmmmmmmmmm

Perhaps comforting for those of us who hope and think that a sale is a much more likely outcome than liquidation ;)

I guess that might depend on whether these next owners decide to move the club out of Coventry like the current lot.

I've assumed (with no facts to back up my assumption - but then, this is an internet forum!) that ACL would wait until after the JR to see if getting that out of the way opens up the possibility of the club returning. If the JR comes and goes and we're left in stalemate, I'd assume that some...

A lot of common ground. When SISU came in, I was supportive of them - as I would be of pretty much any new owner - particularly because I expected that they would bring much more rationality and discipline to the running of the business. Hell, I even thought the appointment of Chris Coleman was...

SISU. "moral obligation". Have we just left satire behind......

I like him. He's funny ;)

Since most families are apparently dysfunctional, that's a pretty good simile :D