Search results

Sqirriol, since you have asked so nicely I will expand my reply, The original deal was signed by previous owners but intended to be for a limited time - they had a buy-back deal on a half interest in ACL I believe SISU have been trying to get the rent reduced since their original purchase...

There speaks a true football supporter! where do all these ACL supporters get off? :pimp:

No problem, they can rip it up now! good luck to them! (& good luck to you with your rent appeal!) :pimp:

The final cost was £118m. But that is the cost of the entire project more than half of which has nothing to do with the FC. casino, hotel, exhibition space etc. We only pay rent for the stadium and then only on a per event basis for 25 time slots of 12 hours. Its very difficult to value but...

My best strategic location would be between Bagington and the Stonebrige roundabout. But the site of the Ivor Preece Centre would be a close second :pimp:

I have no time for people that say SISU are bad, because they're bad! Its baloney! Seven points there wingy, which do you disagree with? :pimp:

thank you for your erudite analysis, and your contribution is? :pimp:

Lets not be so negative about everything at least things are now begining to move forwards! 1. This is all happening because the rent was impossibly high 2. SISU were only one side of the negotiation - both sides were equally responsible for no deal being reached. 3. It was necessary to go to...

It could possibly be that is all SISU are asking for! The last line of the CCLSC minutes reads " It could all be OK if ACL go back to the terms agreed in August 2012." :pimp:

Yes I think you are right, there was something said that SISU had agreed a lower figure with YB. I think that is one of the planks in their request for JR (that the council paid in effect more than was necessary). I think I remeber a figure of £13.4m being quoted? The deal to satisfy Higgs could...

Italia Well I always try to be factual in my viewpoint but we have to scrape facts off the sides of the barrel because of the situation with all sides now being very quiet! Ok I am speculating on the figures but TF confirms HOTs were agreed on two deals. (that I speculate must have probably been...

The forums told us nothing, by then TF was effectively gagged by changed timescales on administration and perhaps the Judicial review. But the earlier CCLSC minutes were surprisingly factual and revealing. They also contradict the general consensus that SISU were trying to get ACL or the Stadium...

Why does it all have to be conspiracy theories, I was thinking the players left in Ltd had been somewhat accidental, I can't believe SISU control everything to that degree. They may be having to sideline some players that they actually wanted to keep? :pimp:

Any that were transfered are not a problem, its the ones that remain in Ltd. That may be marooned. :pimp:

I'm thinking there were a couple of surprises in there, Jordan Clarke and Jennings surprised me. If it was down to where the contracts were, perhaps they could be welcomed back once sorted? But the suggestion of training seperately doesn't seem necessary if that was the case? :pimp:

I have more questions than answers! Does the book value of the registrations get written down year by year over the length of the contract? I am not sure if the contract value equates directly to transfer fee? Is a book value placed on free transfers? Would holdings have a problem fielding...

Maybe the list of players to be released has been effected by whether their contract was with Ltd or Holdings? :pimp:

I think they may have been arranged at a time when it was thought that administration would go quicker that it actually did. The delay in progress turned out to be effectively gagging TF! :pimp:

Worcestershire?......... :pimp:

Thank you Jack, nothing to do with the point I was giving. It was not a personal remark about you and I have no idea why you would go immediately on the defensive! Lets not go there!.. There is a similarity here though, as a group perhaps we can identify with the fear of a shrinking penis! Not...