Search results

it's too early for next seasons odds, we don't even fully know the teams in the league next year. Any odds you can get now will not be well priced.

I still won't be buying one until I believe the clubs primary ambition is to succeed (I don't care what the ambition is of the owners, but I expect that with whatever resources are available the club trys to succeed as the number 1 priority and I still don't believe that is the case) I still...

They had ALOT of money thrown at them and we're going to try and do it with no money thrown at us. I'm all for optimism but only if it's what your hoping for, not what your expecting.

Of course playoffs are a realistic target, that is what we should be striving for next season without a doubt but we should accept that is an overperformance and not a minimum requirement or we'll have people calling for his head even if he is doing as well as we should be expecting and that...

of course something I've been saying for a year and I'm more hopeful that more of it will be spent and spent wisely than last season. However I still think it's unreasonable to insist the minimum we should expect is playoffs next season.

Fisher said the playing budget is 6th-8th I believe, I don't know about anyone else but I take that to mean our budget is 8th. On that basis playoffs are an overperformance even before you take into account that he is basically starting from scratch with the squad and with the clubs systems.

When I hear him speak purchaser of paint is the level I'd put him at. But I shouldn't be mean in a positive thread. TM is saying all the right things, I'm very happy with the appointment and hope he will push for improvements of the pitch too like in the club shop, the fact that he cares about...

Fantastic news, for once well done sisu:claping hands:

That's why I said not like it matters in this case, but I mean it, not knowing how to critically evaluate information could very easily mean you make many unnecessary bad decisions in your life. I give up, I actually think your question biases the votes much more strongly on the no side as...

because you've told us to ignore the fact that we don't believe its not happening, the reason I believe it's not happening is because it's not financially viable, if it was happening then it probably was financially viable, you've also told us this stadium is viable, for it to be viable it must...

If you don't find it helpful to learn then it's your loss. Carry on with your fingers in your ears. Not like it matters in this case but knowing how to understand the quality of information when you are making a decision on it is a very important life skill.

Potentially there are a couple of people who wouldn't want to move if they have a large financial interest in the success of the ricoh and that overrides their opinion as a Coventry fan, but that number if it's anyone here at all is so small that I think it's fair to say Everybody. I'm...

everyone is willing to move in principal despite what sickboy, toorch etc believe. The poll doesn't deliver in anyway the information he seeks. Of course many would move if it wasn't better in everyway, that isn't my point, my point is that 40% of people have voted no they aren't willing to...

You poll is trying to work out if people are willing to move from the Ricoh, the answer to that is everyone is willing to move from the Ricoh under the right circumstances. So the useful question finds out what percentage of people are willing to move under a certain circumstance (you've used...

Absolutely 100% Everyone (ccfc fans) would be willing to move from the Ricoh if what we were moving too was better in everyway and owned by us despite what those who have lost all ability to be reasonable say. So you absolutely need to give an example of what viable means for your poll to be...

If you let people decide for themselves what viable means then everyone is answering a different question and thus your results are meaningless. You've got 40% of people saying no at the moment, so lets say a new stadium popped up near the Ricoh, similar size and quality but ours would people...

The sad thing is that utterly appalling scenario is quite probably better financially than building ourselves, that's how terrible an idea it is and to anyone who wishes to debate that, no ty, we've all wasted too many hours of our lives doing that already and everything that needed to be said...

what does viable mean? is 15k seats, 20 mins away not in Coventry and 50mill debt that costs millions a year to service in 5 years time a viable option? because thats the sort of thing you are likely voting for with yes, but voting no seems wrong too because I'd love our own stadium.

It really is though, You need to know what the other option is before you can make an informed decision on whether the grass is likely to be greener. Its a safe bet that all of us would be delighted to move to a new stadium if it were similar or better to the Ricoh in everyway that matters and...

Thanks, You and I are on the same page regarding active funds (though they are much better than hedge funds). Enjoy your nap.