'these discussions have never been about rent. The discussion is around revenues.' (3 Viewers)

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
If I were ACL I would respond to this with.

"OK, so instead of having rent at £x and no revenue, you can have rent of £(x+y) and revenues of £y, where y is the expected, proven revenue.".

Of course Fisher would not respond, because it's all disingenuous shite. But it would be mildly amusing to prove outright that he just wants to distress ACL.
 

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
If I were ACL I would respond to this with.

"OK, so instead of having rent at £x and no revenue, you can have rent of £(x+y) and revenues of £y, where y is the expected, proven revenue.".

Of course Fisher would not respond, because it's all disingenuous shite. But it would be mildly amusing to prove outright that he just wants to distress ACL.

i bloody hate algebra...;)
 

will am i

Active Member
And how come he renegotiated the rent to £400k only for Joy to change her mind if it was never about the rent. All bullshit we know what its about its about a free stadium. Funny how these uber capitalists are never allowed to lose money
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
They are allowed to lose money. They have lost millions. What we see here is 'not waving but drowning'
 

spider_ricoh

New Member
And how come he renegotiated the rent to £400k only for Joy to change her mind if it was never about the rent. All bullshit we know what its about its about a free stadium. Funny how these uber capitalists are never allowed to lose money

Exactly what I said in another post. Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but.... if Timmy really believes himself when he says "these discussions have never been about rent.“The discussion is around revenues. This club needs to control and manage its matchday revenues..."
If that's the case, why did you shake hands on a rental deal that excluded revenues, only to be overruled by Joy. Ever since then, you've spouted her new line on revenues, but not before.

“We are fully aware of the local businessman behind this. He is part of the problem, not the solution.”
Also, it's worth pondering the above: presuming that he means Gary Hoffman, who has been mentioned by others as being being the KCIC offer: how exactly is Gary "part of the problem"?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
i bloody hate algebra...;)

It's OK man, I've got your back:

Find-X.jpg
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
It's OK man, I've got your back:

Find-X.jpg





Well done shmeee, see you've hacked into Timmy's computer and found the latest design for the new pitch (or at least half of it). I'm guessing x is the centre spot. See if you can keep digging and find the other half, together with planned location ;)
 

skybluericoh

Well-Known Member
Well done shmeee, see you've hacked into Timmy's computer and found the latest design for the new pitch (or at least half of it). I'm guessing x is the centre spot. See if you can keep digging and find the other half, together with planned location ;)


I thought HR had a slope on it back in the 60's but that one takes the biscuit
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top