I'am not entirely sure the City ratepayers would agree with that,and there would still be rates to pay. I do agree that
there was probably some fingers dipping into the pot when the whole stadium deal was finalised.
Also agree the Club need all revenue generated on match day's,F&B car parking etc. Makes you wonder why they sold
the F&B right's, Was that back in Robinsons day?
It is also obvious the the original outlay (less the money received from Tesco) on building the stadium is recuperated.
They should agree a zero rent if it was the most cost effective option for them.
If you give the Football club the revenue generated at the matches and the football club paid the incremental costs like police etc on the day you would be no worse off than you are now.
ACL would gain because the business rates, utilities bills etc pro rata on the stadium would be another cost that the football club would pick up.
Where it gets complicated is when the club want all the revenues from the stadium, like concerts etc
That would be an incremental loss for ACL .
There must be middle ground to suit both.