skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
The sentence was within sentencing guidelines for her crime. It wasn’t even the most severe sentence that could have been passed down. Maybe her legal team didn’t do such a bad job after all. Maybe the real discussion is about sentencing guidelines?100% accurate and nothing to argue, but what was gained by a prison sentence and separation from her family? Lost job, became a martyr, a political pawn and will go on costing the taxpayer.
200 hours community service and we'd never have heard from her again and everyone benefits.
Despite lots of point scoring from both sides, there are no winners in this.
But playing devils advocate’s for a moment if this had have been a Muslim woman and a mother saying burn down army barracks while solders are inside then a lot of the same people arguing that the punishment is too hard in Lucy Connollys case would now be arguing that it’s too lenient. Probably while still claiming that there’s a two tier justice system without any irony. Just look how a lot of the same peoples respond to airplanes being spray painted as a way of protest, or even the government’s own response for that matter.
As the old adage says, if you can’t do the time don’t do the crime.