Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
Or perhaps they are actually onto something…It is bizarre after the Cummings debacle that Labour just copied the same "model" of some weirdo technocrat making all the decisions.
Or perhaps they are actually onto something…It is bizarre after the Cummings debacle that Labour just copied the same "model" of some weirdo technocrat making all the decisions.
If that were the case,why have Brexit?Or perhaps they are actually onto something…
First person to have been checkmated by Starmer since he became PM
Starmer just said she is going nowhere so she's toast, maybe she will resign 'to spend more time with her family' by the end of the month. Has Labour got anyone better or even remotely competent?Reeves seems to have been crying in the chamber today. Think she knows her race is run.
Starmer just said she is going nowhere so she's toast, maybe she will resign 'to spend more time with her family' by the end of the month. Has Labour got anyone better or even remotely competent?
Kendall is probably second only to the odious Wes Streeting in being the biggest Tory in the party. Would be nice to see him leave nextI think Kendall m ay be the first - she could not even be bothered to sit on the front bench
Kendall is probably second only to the odious Wes Streeting in being the biggest Tory in the party. Would be nice to see him leave next
No government has made this big a waste of a huge majority since...the previous oneHe is the bookies favourite to be next Labour leader
Zarah not happy
No government has made this big a waste of a huge majority since...the previous one
She'll be gone before long.Reeves seems to have been crying in the chamber today. Think she knows her race is run.
She'll be gone before long.
If they can't find anyone more competent than Reeves then we've got big problems.Starmer just said she is going nowhere so she's toast, maybe she will resign 'to spend more time with her family' by the end of the month. Has Labour got anyone better or even remotely competent?
I guess those top bands put their savings into something else?Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.
Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.
View attachment 44092
The main effect will be on 40% income tax payers, middle class, middle managers.Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.
Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.
View attachment 44092
Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.
Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.
View attachment 44092
it looks
Sky News: Lottery winner Michael Carroll in line for next ChancellorIf they can't find anyone more competent than Reeves then we've got big problems.
The mega-bucks people have got accountants to shove their money in places like the Caymans, changing ISA rules will have a negligible impact on them.I guess those top bands put their savings into something else?
Not so sure.The graph doesn’t really show anything. Yes, the middle cohort may hold the majority of ISAs but how many of them are making use of the £20k annual limit, or putting more than £5k into it annually? Thats not covered. Naturally, looking at the ‘market value’ plot I’d suggest that the changes would indeed hit the highest earners heaviest.
I just want fairness in how long people have
Pete wouldn’t say boo to a goose so really it’s just twoWow three people.
So I can see why you are so shocked that he isn't getting much support in here.
You literally end up arguing against your own previous points, it's hilarious.
Pete wouldn’t say boo to a goose so really it’s just two
Horrible woman
As the tax relates to the interest received not the amount saved it isn't a wealth tax, its an income tax. Some would argue that there shouldn't be any tax free interest as the personal allowance takes this into account regarding earnings, though I think there should be some incentive to save for those with little disposable income. 20k pa is a lot more than that though.Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.
Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.
View attachment 44092
Three people from a supposedly left wing dominated forum.
The fall out unfolds.
The fall out unfolds.
More the argument that cash ISAs are tying up money the Govt would like people to invest in other things eg stocks & shares to stimulate growth. It's the total amount tied-up rather than individual benefits. Unsurprisingly it's the investment firms and big business that would like to see cash ISAs go.Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.
Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.
View attachment 44092
Wow three people.
So I can see why you are so shocked that he isn't getting much support in here.
You literally end up arguing against your own previous points, it's hilarious.
Pete wouldn’t say boo to a goose so really it’s just two
You can get stocks and shares ISAs and yes, the 20k per limit applies there too…More the argument that cash ISAs are tying up money the Govt would like people to invest in other things eg stocks & shares to stimulate growth. It's the total amount tied-up rather than individual benefits. Unsurprisingly it's the investment firms and big business that would like to see cash ISAs go.