Do you want to discuss boring politics? (16 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You Grendel and Nick the United Peoples Front. Protecting the ISAs and private schools of the working man. 🫔

How’s the flat in Bedworth? You really are a jealous chap aren’t you? Was one of your siblings sent to private school? It would explain the rage.
Ā 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Doubtful. What are the circumstances that will lead to an early election? They're not going to lose a confidence vote realistically with the majority they have.
Honestly, it’s unprecedented but after how many more U-turns before Starmer packs it in or is kicked out? A new leader and there’ll be calls for a new election.

I didn’t vote for Labour but at least thought they could push through some meaningful reforms that could benefit the country. It’s a wasted government and it’s already ran out of steam.

Apparently, according to Labour-leaning ā€˜sources’ I follow on X, Starmer said the welfare bill was a matter of ā€˜confidence’ and the number of rebelling MPs supposedly grew.

In my view, Labour is in an identity crisis because what or who does the party actually stand for? Seriously, if Corbyn launches a new party it could be cataclysmic for Labour.
Ā 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Honestly, it’s unprecedented but after how many more U-turns before Starmer packs it in or is kicked out? A new leader and there’ll be calls for a new election.

I didn’t vote for Labour but at least thought they could push through some meaningful reforms that could benefit the country. It’s a wasted government and it’s already ran out of steam.

Apparently, according to Labour-leaning ā€˜sources’ I follow on X, Starmer said the welfare bill was a matter of ā€˜confidence’ and the number of rebelling MPs supposedly grew.

In my view, Labour is in an identity crisis because what or who does the party actually stand for? Seriously, if Corbyn launches a new party it could be cataclysmic for Labour.
Did I read it on here,or pick it up online but the guy behind it all could've been a Tory adviser, Liz Kendall, Reeve's come out like storm troopers with their firm talk,!
Ā 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Did I read it on here,or pick it up online but the guy behind it all could've been a Tory adviser, Liz Kendall, Reeve's come out like storm troopers with their firm talk,!
No idea. Which scenario would be worse:

1) an ex/current Tory advisor dictating policy for a Labour government

2) Labour actually drafted these plans themselves

Both scenarios are pretty damning and frankly, the government can’t claim to be in control.

At least when Tony Blair put the Iraq War motion to parliament, he had the bollocks to threaten resignation when facing a significant backbench rebellion. For all Blair’s many faults, he generally stood behind what he believed was the ā€˜right’ policy (ironically, this example ended up being v wrong).
Ā 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
No idea. Which scenario would be worse:

1) an ex/current Tory advisor dictating policy for a Labour government

2) Labour actually drafted these plans themselves

Both scenarios are pretty damning and frankly, the government can’t claim to be in control.

At least when Tony Blair put the Iraq War motion to parliament, he had the bollocks to threaten resignation when facing a significant backbench rebellion. For all Blair’s many faults, he generally stood behind what he believed was the ā€˜right’ policy (ironically, this example ended up being v wrong).
Blair should have stood in The Hague with fellow war criminal Bush. Not a great example. He lied to the British public, and to Parliament, and he knew he was lying.
Ā 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
🤣 Christ. Jealous and bitter about "wealthy" people putting money in savings now? 🤣

Wanting people to pay tax isn’t jealousy you weirdo. I probably earn more than you.
Ā 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
Wanting people to pay tax isn’t jealousy you weirdo. I probably earn more than you.

Apart from when you're going to the cash point to pay your drug dealer.

This is the issue with those who obsess over politics, usually massive hypocrites.

You probably do, it's you going on about people being "wealthy".
Ā 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

tisza

Well-Known Member
I didn’t vote for Labour but at least thought they could push through some meaningful reforms that could benefit the country. It’s a wasted government and it’s already ran out of steam.
They are just finding out Govt is difficult (lack of practice). You can't do everything, you can't keep everybody happy etc
Ā 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
because it's been apparent for a while that Starmer is pretty useless and can't really lead. It's not a shock.

Many on here still think he is doing very well.
Ā 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Probably because Starmer’s so damn popular on here.
Sure we'll be told its all part of some brilliant plan to win the next election, that's normally what we get.

Seems to be an increasing number of Westminster journalists reporting that questions are being asked of how tenable Reeves continuing in the role of chancellor is. Would not be at all surprised to see the blame passed on to her. A convenient get out for Starmer and would likely also allow them to abandon the fiscal rules that are tying them in knots.
Ā 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sure we'll be told its all part of some brilliant plan to win the next election, that's normally what we get.

Seems to be an increasing number of Westminster journalists reporting that questions are being asked of how tenable Reeves continuing in the role of chancellor is. Would not be at all surprised to see the blame passed on to her. A convenient get out for Starmer and would likely also allow them to abandon the fiscal rules that are tying them in knots.

Kendall wasn’t even sitting on the front bench at PMQs
Ā 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Zarah not happy

Ā 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Sure we'll be told its all part of some brilliant plan to win the next election, that's normally what we get.

Seems to be an increasing number of Westminster journalists reporting that questions are being asked of how tenable Reeves continuing in the role of chancellor is. Would not be at all surprised to see the blame passed on to her. A convenient get out for Starmer and would likely also allow them to abandon the fiscal rules that are tying them in knots.

Seems to be that the strategist who ā€œwon them the electionā€ Morgan McSweeney (who, if like me you believe in these kind of things, looks a right c**t) is behind all of this. Allegedly wanted to sack 10MPs an hour until they agreed to the PIP cuts. Some of the quotes coming out of number ten right now sound like a bad parody of the thick of it. Mate if you can’t manage a massive majority that’s on you. If anyone goes as a sacrificial lamb I’d expect him first.

I will say though, this is why you vote in Labour MPs, because ultimately that’s what meant they could rebel. Would have been useless in opposition.
Ā 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Seems to be that the strategist who ā€œwon them the electionā€ Morgan McSweeney (who, if like me you believe in these kind of things, looks a right c**t) is behind all of this. Allegedly wanted to sack 10MPs an hour until they agreed to the PIP cuts. Some of the quotes coming out of number ten right now sound like a bad parody of the thick of it. Mate if you can’t manage a massive majority that’s on you. If anyone goes as a sacrificial lamb I’d expect him first.

I will say though, this is why you vote in Labour MPs, because ultimately that’s what meant they could rebel. Would have been useless in opposition.

McSweeney is, to my mind at least, undoubtedly the key protagonist behind all of this. But track record suggests he above all else will be retained by Starmer.
Ā 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Seems to be that the strategist who ā€œwon them the electionā€ Morgan McSweeney (who, if like me you believe in these kind of things, looks a right c**t) is behind all of this. Allegedly wanted to sack 10MPs an hour until they agreed to the PIP cuts. Some of the quotes coming out of number ten right now sound like a bad parody of the thick of it. Mate if you can’t manage a massive majority that’s on you. If anyone goes as a sacrificial lamb I’d expect him first.

I will say though, this is why you vote in Labour MPs, because ultimately that’s what meant they could rebel. Would have been useless in opposition.
The fundamental issue is that Labour did not have a detailed manifesto to fall back on.

Rachel Reeves will be ditched, perhaps McSweeney too. Make no mistake, Starmer is on borrowed time as PM.
Ā 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Seems to be that the strategist who ā€œwon them the electionā€ Morgan McSweeney (who, if like me you believe in these kind of things, looks a right c**t) is behind all of this. Allegedly wanted to sack 10MPs an hour until they agreed to the PIP cuts. Some of the quotes coming out of number ten right now sound like a bad parody of the thick of it. Mate if you can’t manage a massive majority that’s on you. If anyone goes as a sacrificial lamb I’d expect him first.

I will say though, this is why you vote in Labour MPs, because ultimately that’s what meant they could rebel. Would have been useless in opposition.
It is bizarre after the Cummings debacle that Labour just copied the same "model" of some weirdo technocrat making all the decisions.
Ā 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top