Welcome to Sky Blues Talk!

You're currently viewing the forum as a guest. Join thousands of fellow Coventry City fans today!

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (11 Viewers)

Who signs off on this stuff? I'm starting to wonder if the tories haven't managed to embed people into Starmers team, basic stuff seems to be so badly executed time and time again.
 
An actual expert agreeing with the experts on here re: Starmers economic policy.


 
And they said, verily, letteth the sewage run through the streets



Torn. On the one hand just been posting about how onerous planning and environmental concerns massive inflate the cost and time of building in this country. On the other this seems a funny place to start.

Have you got anything on why this is an issue specifically? Like what are the likely real world consequences?
 
International break .... even the politics is pretty boring. Needs more scandal and outrage. Up your game Rishi!
 
International break .... even the politics is pretty boring. Needs more scandal and outrage. Up your game Rishi!
Just get the useless muppet to stop people dumping shit in rivers to start with…
 
Just get the useless muppet to stop people dumping shit in rivers to start with…
Not sure how he prevents that tbf, but what he should do is block the tax cuts for them that he introduced.
 
Saw a stat earlier. 1 in 4 pensioners are millionaires.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire Dancing GIF by Stellify Media
 
Saw a stat earlier. 1 in 4 pensioners are millionaires.

I'd like to see their definition of a millionaire.
If you've got a 400k house and a 600k pension pot are you classed as a millionaire?
Because that's not exuberant.
 
I'd like to see their definition of a millionaire.
If you've got a 400k house and a 600k pension pot are you classed as a millionaire?
Because that's not exuberant.

Yeah probably. And you are in fact a millionaire in that case if the house is paid off.

What to do with the cash poor and asset rich has long been a problem.
 
I dunno, I'dbe quite cheerful with that.

Im 25 years from retirement and don’t look anything like getting close to that. Until my pensioner parents die and divvy up their assets of course. Which I’m hoping doesn’t happen in the next 25 years!
 
Im 25 years from retirement and don’t look anything like getting close to that. Until my pensioner parents die and divvy up their assets of course. Which I’m hoping doesn’t happen in the next 25 years!
None of us exuberant at the thought of retirement then.

Am not entirely sure on a system that relies on the lottery of having solvent parents for offspring's welath, either.
 
None of us exuberant at the thought of retirement then.

Am not entirely sure on a system that relies on the lottery of having solvent parents for offspring's welath, either.

Especially when you consider that it’s likely wealthier parents have fewer kids to distribute across so the wealth gap is only going to get more pronounced next generation.
 
3 in 4 are not

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Just blew me away. It’s all housing wealth but still. I’ve started this fight before but generally speaking pensioners are a very well looked after demographic. Because they vote and every MP will be one one day.

If there’s money going I’d give it to families over pensioners every day TBH. Obviously talking general groups not targeted support.
 
Especially when you consider that it’s likely wealthier parents have fewer kids to distribute across so the wealth gap is only going to get more pronounced next generation.
Yeah, basically my future is either comfortable or not dependent on whether my parents need nursing care. As a system of wealth creation, that's flawed... and they're not even particularly well off, just careful with money and with only one child. But they earned that, not me.

I haven't earned any of that, though! Likewise if they need nursing care, it's not my fault that others won't and will therefore pass on more to people who aren't me!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom