In that case, 4-0 loss, Kane to score an own goal and QPR to resign him on monday.
In that case, 4-0 loss, Kane to score an own goal and QPR to resign him on monday.
Assume so, QPR couldn't get rid of him quick enough, so doubt they included any clauses.
I don't think the rules allow a non playing clause not to play against the selling club when a player's registration changes after a sale
They do for loans for obvious reasons
Last time that happened must have been Boro not playing Juke thanks to a gentleman’s agreement
Sorry @better days , I was being a bit mischievous with the Cain, Abel bit - just discovered Wordle (got them in 3 and 4 on my first 2, so far) and it's messing with wordplay in my head. I will now desist (perhaps!)
Hopefully not Hamer, Sheaf or O'Hare. Those 3 are the most critical in my opinion. Big drop off when we lose any of them.
O hare was limping like a goodun end of the Peterborough game, id assume he is one?
If all fit I'd play
-------------Moore
----Rose - Fadz - JCS
Kane ---------------Bidwell
------Hamer - Sheaf
------------O'Hare
-------Vik - Godden
-------------Moore
----Rose - Fadz - JCS
Kane ---------------Bidwell
------Hamer - Sheaf
------------O'Hare
-------Vik - Godden
We just seem to be having a run of crucial players missing games at the moment and not getting a run of all players be available , the work we did in the summer bringing in a good squad hopefully pays off now
Have we had an extended amount of games in the last two seasons when O'Hare hasn't played?
Edit: Just checked. He appeared in 46 games last season and 24 so far this season apparently.
I don´t think it is really clear to say nothing happens when he doesn´t play, as the stats suggest we haven´t played any real games without him involved as anything less than a substitute.
Regardless the quality drop off to Shipley or Allen is still pretty significant.
Games where he goes off you can tell pretty quickly. It turns generally aimless
I reckon Dabo’s rwb slot has gone, I love Dabo but Kane is the better player imo
Is that because most of what we try goes through him and we don't have a no O'Hare plan
Well we’ve been exceptionally lucky for him to have been ever present-another AM and this issue goes
Not sure about QPR attack but, if they are swinging the crosses in from corners and set pieces you want Moore to command the area, as Wilson has his weakness against balls dropping close to the goal. Otherwise, Wilson has been really good the last two games. I base Wilson's performance for the Peterborough game on highlights and the comments of others as I missed the match.
I think with the games coming thick and fast due to postponements, you will see players rested and rotated for some games.
Questions for management are best goalie to pick, is Bidwell ready and is Shippers good enough against a better class of wing back, is McFadz (our best player so far this season) fit and ready and do you want to upset players who have given us two good results in the last couple of games.
Hamer - no he wasn't. he got a very tricky bouncing ball from short range which Grant was able to nick off him. It was a 50/50 ball. The problem was the poor downward headed clearance
Play your best team
Moore & Fadz back into the side as well as Bidwell for Shipley...Shipley will get hammered against their right winger
Moore & Fadz back into the side as well as Bidwell for Shipley...Shipley will get hammered against their right winger
I watched the lat QPR game the other day and Moore was excellent and pulled off some great saves. Waghorn and Györkeres were very dangerous as well. Holding onto some hope here.
I'm scared
Just speaking to a QPR ST holder work colleague
He expects their 11 to be
Marshall
Dickie Dunne Barbet
Adomah Wallace
Field Johansen
Willock
Austin Dykes
Some team that for this league
In a 3 4 1 2 set up
Just speaking to a QPR ST holder work colleague
He expects their 11 to be
Marshall
Dickie Dunne Barbet
Adomah Wallace
Field Johansen
Willock
Austin Dykes
Some team that for this league
In a 3 4 1 2 set up