Oh Jeremy Corbyn (12 Viewers)

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
Just in case Grendel's lurking too, I'll slip in my condemnation of Stalin and his murderous, genocidal ways too. Bit unfortunate we had to have the lefty murderous genocidal madman on our side in WW2 to fight the righty murderous genocidal madmen really!
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
What we do have to judge on is the Labour Party's manifesto under Corbyn, which was a Social Democratic manifesto, and not really at all radical, when it came down to it!

Rather than who's grave he's visited, that's a far more appropriate document to see what kind of Prime Minister he'd be, surely... and that manifesto would still not be for many.

I'd hope, however, the commitment to policy would be of more importance than where they've visited although I dunno, is everybody who's visited the British Museum Reading Room a closet Marxist really?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It seems to be the rather simplistic way we play politics - split into 'left' and well... 'others' and then decide anyone with a left leaning outlook is a murderous communist!

(We won't even get into the debate as to how Stalin took a movement and corrupted it, as that would be rather boring really)

Well we can go into the debate if you like.

Lenin created the Red Terror. He introduced death camps for any opponent who disagreed with the communist ideology. Rehibilitation meant in reality torture and death. Families were torn apart and many women and children were executed at Lenin and Trotsky behest.

Any opposition was snuffed out - anti Semitic behaviour was actively encouraged and viewed as a sign of nationalism (perhaps this is the biggest attraction to Corbyn)

The economic worth declined by over 90% which was some achievement given the low base it started.

It’s impossible to calculate the extent of mass slaughter but some estimates go as high as 4 million - he opened nearly 100 death camps during his reign.

If you believe that to be the true sign of communism at its best then God help us.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Just in case Grendel's lurking too, I'll slip in my condemnation of Stalin and his murderous, genocidal ways too. Bit unfortunate we had to have the lefty murderous genocidal madman on our side in WW2 to fight the righty murderous genocidal madmen really!

Strange how under Lenin murder, torture, rape and pillage is justifiable.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Oh dear..
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Notice anything odd...
DTa_r69W4AEbtZ8.jpg:large
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
UK Polling report has a page where you can see the number of seat won from parallel voting intentions percentages. You can put in your own numbers. It shows clearly why boundary changes are needed as they are unfair. Enter 42% Labour and 42% Conservative and Labour get a majority. Conservatives need 45% to Labour's 40% to get a majority.

UK Polling Report
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
So yes their religion and society is patriarchal.
As are many other religious groups.
It died out here largely after the reformation, think it went on much longer in Ireland
Question is who can change it and how to achieve that.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I think it might be the seating arrangements?

why is this on Corbyn thread?
Anyone watch House of Saud: Family t war the other night?

Presented plenty of evidence to prove the point me and others have been making on here for ages, you won't stop militant Islamists until you stop letting the Saudis fund the spread of Wahhabism, but while western leaders keep cosying up to their regime I can't see it happening anytime soon.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
why is this on Corbyn thread?
Anyone watch House of Saud: Family t war the other night?

Presented plenty of evidence to prove the point me and others have been making on here for ages, you won't stop militant Islamists until you stop letting the Saudis fund the spread of Wahhabism, but while western leaders keep cosying up to their regime I can't see it happening anytime soon.

David Cameron ordered an inquiry into these links at the behest of the Lib Dems, but it has been repeatedly stalled. No shit as to why.
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
Labour have replaced Ann Black as Head of Disciplinary Matters with Momentum Director Christine Shawcroft. On the very same day, it seems that Jared O'Mara has recovered from his long illness and is now fit to face his disciplinary investigation. I wonder if Keith Vaz has also recently recovered and will be returning to work soon?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Labour have replaced Ann Black as Head of Disciplinary Matters with Momentum Director Christine Shawcroft. On the very same day, it seems that Jared O'Mara has recovered from his long illness and is now fit to face his disciplinary investigation. I wonder if Keith Vaz has also recently recovered and will be returning to work soon?

they missed a trick to try and unite the warring factions within the party here and I think there is also an element of trying to get revenge for the 'left wing purge' of a few years back.

They should be focusing on their main purpose which is holding the tories to account for their inept running of the country instead of getting involved in all this infighting.

I have defended Corbyn a lot because some of the accusations thrown at him have been absurd and in some cases just plain bullshit but he is the party leader, this is 100% on him - he needs to sort it quickly.

Because with an incompetent government and toothless opposition you never know who might come along to fill the vacuum.
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
they missed a trick to try and unite the warring factions within the party here and I think there is also an element of trying to get revenge for the 'left wing purge' of a few years back.

They should be focusing on their main purpose which is holding the tories to account for their inept running of the country instead of getting involved in all this infighting.

I have defended Corbyn a lot because some of the accusations thrown at him have been absurd and in some cases just plain bullshit but he is the party leader, this is 100% on him - he needs to sort it quickly.

Because with an incompetent government and toothless opposition you never know who might come along to fill the vacuum.

Well, as you know, I think that 'you never know what might come along' is already here. Just before I left this discussion last time, someone stated that I was 'hysterical about Corbyn'. I'll dispute the word hysterical, because I don't do panic and screaming, but he's right that I am very deeply concerned about where this is going.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Well, as you know, I think that 'you never know what might come along' is already here. Just before I left this discussion last time, someone stated that I was 'hysterical about Corbyn'. I'll dispute the word hysterical, because I don't do panic and screaming, but he's right that I am very deeply concerned about where this is going.

well for me it will be the continued entrenchment of neo liberalism or more worryingly something to the right of that.
I think you may be referring to you worrying about how far to the left Labour goes, but it it does it will be even less electable than it is now.
Corbyn did well at the last election but for me he needed to do two things to continue the momentum, (no pun intended), make his position clear on Europe and hold out an olive branch to the centrists and blairites in the party and he's done neither.
Meanwhile captain May continues to steer the ship onto the rocks.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
they missed a trick to try and unite the warring factions within the party here and I think there is also an element of trying to get revenge for the 'left wing purge' of a few years back.

They should be focusing on their main purpose which is holding the tories to account for their inept running of the country instead of getting involved in all this infighting.

I have defended Corbyn a lot because some of the accusations thrown at him have been absurd and in some cases just plain bullshit but he is the party leader, this is 100% on him - he needs to sort it quickly.

Because with an incompetent government and toothless opposition you never know who might come along to fill the vacuum.
LOL, there is a purge underway,. "night of the long knives" will follow soon.
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
He's not going to unite the party; he's not going to even try. He's going to entrench his position and Lansman et alia are only the start. This is a formula that the extreme left always follow.

I wish he weren't electable but I fear he is. If there were an election today Labour would win a majority, even if 42% of the population voted Conservative (see my other post about boundaries). Whilst there are videos around showing what he and McDonnell really want to do and what they believe, they've now stopped that and are on a full-scale attempt to persuade people that they are moderate Social Democrats. I wrote somewhere else on here something that Northern Wisdom objected to, but it wasn't intended to be inflammatory: he has the young who, generalising, don't have the knowledge or experience to know what they are voting for. He has a huge number of people who will vote Labour irrespective of their policies, many of whom also wouldn't understand the policies. And he has some people who believe in real socialism or think that it cannot be worse than capitalism. It looks like they add up to 42% of the population and I cannot see that changing anytime soon. If the Lords decide to reject the Brexit exit bill in autumn (and let's not forget that it is stuffed full of Liberal and Labour peers) then I've read that a General Election might need to be called.

A few days ago I researched the advisory committee of economists that McDonnell had put together to support his claim that he was fiscally responsible. Although it was filled with left-leaning economists I learned that it was disbanded in 2016 as they all quit. David Blanchflower said: "
I advised Corbyn’s economics team to learn fast. They didn’t". Behind the mask, McDonnell hasn't changed one iota from the man that described some socialist activists giving people a 'good kicking' as 'the best of us'.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
well for me it will be the continued entrenchment of neo liberalism or more worryingly something to the right of that.
I think you may be referring to you worrying about how far to the left Labour goes, but it it does it will be even less electable than it is now.
Corbyn did well at the last election but for me he needed to do two things to continue the momentum, (no pun intended), make his position clear on Europe and hold out an olive branch to the centrists and blairites in the party and he's done neither.
Meanwhile captain May continues to steer the ship onto the rocks.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

I agree about trying to engage the centrists, but they have to be willing to get involved as well - which a lot of them still won't do. Both need to do more to find common ground.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

I agree about trying to engage the centrists, but they have to be willing to get involved as well - which a lot of them still won't do. Both need to do more to find common ground.

Totally agree. Both sides have to remember what their main purpose is - to defeat the tories.
I've said it many times, the tories are equally divided but they can put it all to one side when it comes to elections.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
He's not going to unite the party; he's not going to even try. He's going to entrench his position and Lansman et alia are only the start. This is a formula that the extreme left always follow.

I wish he weren't electable but I fear he is. If there were an election today Labour would win a majority, even if 42% of the population voted Conservative (see my other post about boundaries). Whilst there are videos around showing what he and McDonnell really want to do and what they believe, they've now stopped that and are on a full-scale attempt to persuade people that they are moderate Social Democrats. I wrote somewhere else on here something that Northern Wisdom objected to, but it wasn't intended to be inflammatory: he has the young who, generalising, don't have the knowledge or experience to know what they are voting for. He has a huge number of people who will vote Labour irrespective of their policies, many of whom also wouldn't understand the policies. And he has some people who believe in real socialism or think that it cannot be worse than capitalism. It looks like they add up to 42% of the population and I cannot see that changing anytime soon. If the Lords decide to reject the Brexit exit bill in autumn (and let's not forget that it is stuffed full of Liberal and Labour peers) then I've read that a General Election might need to be called.

A few days ago I researched the advisory committee of economists that McDonnell had put together to support his claim that he was fiscally responsible. Although it was filled with left-leaning economists I learned that it was disbanded in 2016 as they all quit. David Blanchflower said: "
I advised Corbyn’s economics team to learn fast. They didn’t". Behind the mask, McDonnell hasn't changed one iota from the man that described some socialist activists giving people a 'good kicking' as 'the best of us'.

David Blanchflower puts the boot into Hammond and Brexit as well!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top