Seriously think that it will gradually die down once they relocate overseas. Focus just even more on William & Kate and their kids.I wish there was a way of getting all broadcast and print media to agree to a news blackout on the Sussexes - see how they like that!
But i can't see the likes of the Mail and Express (in particular) signing up to that.
Seriously think that it will gradually die down once they relocate overseas. Focus just even more on William & Kate and their kids.
Did people really care about who was 6 & 7th in-line to the throne before Harry was born?
Princess Margaret was fifth, and went into exile long before she slipped down the pecking order (when Peter and Zara Philips were born)Seriously think that it will gradually die down once they relocate overseas. Focus just even more on William & Kate and their kids.
Did people really care about who was 6 & 7th in-line to the throne before Harry was born?
That's part of it.They want to use their title for commercial gain so it will not die down. That’s the irony - the big bad media will be required when they want it
There you go another 2nd in-line that had a colourful history and then faded into the background. Harry obviously struggled with it.Princess Margaret was fifth, and went into exile long before she slipped down the pecking order (when Peter and Zara Philips were born)
There you go another 2nd in-line that had a colourful history and then faded into the background. Harry obviously struggled with it.
Maybe everyone needs to take a breath and focus on whether being 2nd in line but without a realistic chance of getting "promoted" effects Harry and his predecessors in that role.
Hasn't Harry only ever been 3rd in line. Behind Charles and William?There you go another 2nd in-line that had a colourful history and then faded into the background. Harry obviously struggled with it.
Maybe everyone needs to take a breath and focus on whether being 2nd in line but without a realistic chance of getting "promoted" effects Harry and his predecessors in that role.
yep getting ahead of myselfHasn't Harry only ever been 3rd in line. Behind Charles and William?
That's more my point.Well he’s not second in line. Other royals such as Princess Anne in particular do hundreds of engagements every year and a lot is low key. These two just want a luxury lifestyle funded by the taxpayer and it’s not on
Well, fuck me!!! That is quite astounding!
The hatred was there right from the start when they started dating.Where has this hatred come from (not that i actually give a shit about her/them)? Is it purely unconscious bias based on her racial identity? Or that she's a money-grabbing egotistical witch?
Keep seeing this mentioned but does anyone know why this was paid for by the taxpayer and not from the Sovereign Grant? I thought that was supposed to cover property maintenance.We the taxpaying public paid for the update of the Sussex's home to the tune of several million pounds.
Is that enough to make them financially independent?Was some marketing guru on sky news who claims they'll make 500m in the 1st year alone.
It was paid from the sovereign grant.Keep seeing this mentioned but does anyone know why this was paid for by the taxpayer and not from the Sovereign Grant? I thought that was supposed to cover property maintenance.
Nothing compared to the £370m the taxpayer will part with for Buckingham Palace refurbishments.
Nothing compared to the £370m the taxpayer will part with for Buckingham Palace refurbishments.
It’s an absurd amount for the taxpayer to be paying considering their wealth.That’s irrelevant really as it’s a national state building.
It’s an absurd amount for the taxpayer to be paying considering their wealth.
They don’t own it and actually are hardly ever there
I’m sure the Queen herself spends the majority of her time there and I still maintain it’s absurd that the taxpayer has to pay such a large sum for the repairs, and how much are they spending on the repairs themselves?
Surely if it’s a publicly funded building the whole place should be opened up to attend all year round with free admission?
He's now denying he said it even though he did say it in a radio interview.
His leadership bid hasn't exactly got off to a flyer.
He’s not going to get the nominations so I think he’s just throwing stuff hoping something gets him attention now.
She hardly spends any time there at all. It’s just a front. It wasn’t even originally a royal residence and I suspect given the choice they would refuse to occupy rather than repair it.
It’s a show palace for events and it has offices for staff but it’s primary function is to display the trooping of the colour and attract tourists to see it.
I’m pretty certain a lot of it is not habitable
Heard about this one on 5Live this morning. But some commentator said that everyone loved Meghan when they were dating, and to the wedding and beyond. It was only when they they started displaying self-destructive behaviour and that not in keeping with royal protocol that the proles turned against her..
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?