Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (22 Viewers)

  • Thread starter tisza
  • Start date Jan 10, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 393
  • 394
  • 395
  • 396
  • 397
  • …
  • 401
Next
First Prev 395 of 401 Next Last
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:07 AM
  • #13,791
David O'Day said:
I don't think they should report the beliefs or even the names of people who do acts like this.

Starve them of the infamy they desire.
Click to expand...
You can be sure they won’t report his beliefs if he’s a neo Nazi who was pissed off at Kirk for ‘selling out’.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:08 AM
  • #13,792
shmmeee said:
OK let’s play a game. I’ll post some random things Charlie Kirk has said, then you post the Jo Cox equivalent.

View attachment 45970
Click to expand...

You can’t get out of that mindset can you?

THIS IS THE PROBLEM

You’ve picked a bunch of things you personally disagree with, so have decided that he somehow had less right to speak his opinions than someone you agree with

Do you support the fundamental principle that people should have the right to say things that you disagree with?
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:14 AM
  • #13,793
bigfatronssba said:
You can’t get out of that mindset can you?

THIS IS THE PROBLEM

You’ve picked a bunch of things you personally disagree with, so have decided that he somehow had less right to speak his opinions than someone you agree with

Do you support the fundamental principle that people should have the right to say things that you disagree with?
Click to expand...

Bloody hell man. Can you not see what you're doing? Read back what you've written there and apply it to the conversations you're having right now.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:19 AM
  • #13,794
shmmeee said:
OK let’s play a game. I’ll post some random things Charlie Kirk has said, then you post the Jo Cox equivalent.

View attachment 45970
Click to expand...
Fucking hell.

It's not how I do things but can somewhat understand why people don't care what happened.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:19 AM
  • #13,795
bigfatronssba said:
You can’t get out of that mindset can you?

THIS IS THE PROBLEM

You’ve picked a bunch of things you personally disagree with, so have decided that he somehow had less right to speak his opinions than someone you agree with

Do you support the fundamental principle that people should have the right to say things that you disagree with?
Click to expand...
Course he does and the reason you can’t show things like that that Jo cox said is because she didn’t
 
Reactions: Otis and covcity4life

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:25 AM
  • #13,796
Sky Blue Pete said:
Course he does and the reason you can’t show things like that that Jo cox said is because she didn’t
Click to expand...

If someone is incited to violence because a man has expressed his opinions, who is to blame?

The person who has expressed their opinion? Or the person who has committed violence?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:26 AM
  • #13,797
PVA said:
Bloody hell man. Can you not see what you're doing? Read back what you've written there and apply it to the conversations you're having right now.
Click to expand...

WTF are you on about?

I support everyone’s right to speak freely
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:27 AM
  • #13,798
covcity4life said:
Fucking hell.

It's not how I do things but can somewhat understand why people don't care what happened.
Click to expand...

Victim blaming
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:28 AM
  • #13,799
bigfatronssba said:
WTF are you on about?

I support everyone’s right to speak freely
Click to expand...
yet last night you were telling me “watch what you post…”
 
Reactions: Otis

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:28 AM
  • #13,800
bigfatronssba said:
WTF are you on about?

I support everyone’s right to speak freely
Click to expand...
no you don't, you've been policing peoples views and words for the last 12 hours

liar
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:29 AM
  • #13,801
Ccfcisparks said:
yet last night you were telling me “watch what you post…”
Click to expand...

Fair comment. Post what you want.

I reserve the right to disagree
 
Reactions: Ccfcisparks

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:30 AM
  • #13,802
David O'Day said:
no you don't, you've been policing peoples views and words for the last 12 hours

liar
Click to expand...

Apart from a single response, at no point have I tried to stop people posting.

You’re confusing disagreement with cancellation
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:32 AM
  • #13,803
bigfatronssba said:
Apart from a single response, at no point have I tried to stop people posting.

You’re confusing disagreement with cancellation
Click to expand...
you've been attacking before for what they or more like you conceive they have said

that's not "free speech" is it buddy
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:34 AM
  • #13,804
David O'Day said:
you've been attacking before for what they or more like you conceive they have said

that's not "free speech" is it buddy
Click to expand...

Yes it is. You can say whatever, I can criticise you for it.
That is precisely what free speech is.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:36 AM
  • #13,805
bigfatronssba said:
Yes it is. You can say whatever, I can criticise you for it.
That is precisely what free speech is.
Click to expand...
no, you are seeking to silence people and stop opinions you don't share

you've tied yourself in knots here, lovely stuff

"You can say anything you want, no not that though"

hypocrite
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:36 AM
  • #13,806
bigfatronssba said:
WTF are you on about?

I support everyone’s right to speak freely
Click to expand...

But you don't, because you're telling people how to feel about this, not to mention Kirk's views etc etc. It's ridiculous hypocrisy.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:37 AM
  • #13,807
bigfatronssba said:
His whole intention was to encourage debate.
Click to expand...

It's sh*t what's happened and it's sad for a lot of reasons, but that doesn't mean anyone needs to pretend he encouraged debate (see his Professor Watchlist and School Board Watchlist projects).
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:37 AM
  • #13,808
PVA said:
But you don't, because you're telling people how to feel about this, not to mention Kirk's views etc etc. It's ridiculous hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:37 AM
  • #13,809
bigfatronssba said:
If someone is incited to violence because a man has expressed his opinions, who is to blame?

The person who has expressed their opinion? Or the person who has committed violence?
Click to expand...
The person committing the violence but and it’s quite a big one we have laws about inciting hatred and inciting violence so there’s clearly some aspects of what we do that does contribute to something

Nothing (but you have to be careful with this as there are caveats) excuses the taking of another persons life)

Apart from maybe war
Self defence
Defending someone else
If they’ve already taken someone’s life - death penalty

You can see how it’s not binary I mean dom and others want people guilty of sexual assault to be killed
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:37 AM
  • #13,810
bigfatronssba said:
Victim blaming
Click to expand...
Didn't he say empathy is a sin?
 
Reactions: rondog1973 and Sky Blue Pete

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:38 AM
  • #13,811
mmttww said:
It's sh*t what's happened and it's sad for a lot of reasons, but that doesn't mean anyone needs to pretend he encouraged debate (see his Professor Watchlist and School Board Watchlist projects).
Click to expand...

That was literally his entire stated aim
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:38 AM
  • #13,812
bigfatronssba said:
Learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation
Click to expand...
That is good advice for yourself.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:38 AM
  • #13,813
covcity4life said:
Didn't he say empathy is a sin?
Click to expand...
Yes as well as a lot of other things
Trump showing a lot of empathy I see for opponents this morning
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:38 AM
  • #13,814
covcity4life said:
Didn't he say empathy is a sin?
Click to expand...

Did he?

So what?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:39 AM
  • #13,815
mmttww said:
It's sh*t what's happened and it's sad for a lot of reasons, but that doesn't mean anyone needs to pretend he encouraged debate (see his Professor Watchlist and School Board Watchlist projects).
Click to expand...
Lots of his debates where just him answering completely different questions to the one asked.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:39 AM
  • #13,816
bigfatronssba said:
That was literally his entire stated aim
Click to expand...

then he either didn't know what the word meant or he was being misleading which for a bloke that supported the conspiracy theories he did, would not be a surprise.
 
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:42 AM
  • #13,817
This thread proves that there just can't and won't ever be and kind of discourse between left and right leaning individuals.

Charlie Kirk came out with a lot of pretty batshit things, that's undeniable. He was the poster boy for American Conservatism and genuinely some of his views were like he was sucked out of 1957 - largely to whip up right wing hysteria while farming clicks/views to monetise his political influencer career. I very much doubt he believed half of the rhetoric he came out with.

But fundamentally what happened yesterday was abhorrent. Right or left you should be allowed to air your views without the concern of violence coming your way, least of all on the horrific scale of what happened to Charlie.

What's happening in the US is pretty concerning to say the least. The polarised gulf between both ends of the spectrum is getting wider and these incidents only serve to increase that gap and entrench partisan views further.

I do feel it's lost as a country and the increasing tension which is building is only going to end in more mindless violence being committed.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys, AOM, CCFCSteve and 2 others

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:43 AM
  • #13,818
KenilworthSkyBlue said:
This thread proves that there just can't and won't ever be and kind of discourse between left and right leaning individuals.

Charlie Kirk came out with a lot of pretty batshit things, that's undeniable. He was the poster boy for American Conservatism and genuinely some of his views were like he was sucked out of 1957 - largely to whip up right wing hysteria while farming clicks/views to monetise his political influencer career. I very much doubt he believed half of the rhetoric he came out with.

But fundamentally what happened yesterday was abhorrent. Right or left you should be allowed to air your views without the concern of violence coming your way, least of all on the horrific scale of what happened to Charlie.

What's happening in the US is pretty concerning to say the least. The polarised gulf between both ends of the spectrum is getting wider and these incidents only serve to increase that gap and entrench partisan views further.

I do feel it's lost as a country and the increasing tension which is building is only going to end in more mindless violence being committed.
Click to expand...
why does it? Everyone was getting on fine and agreeing until one person tried to police how people should feel.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:45 AM
  • #13,819
KenilworthSkyBlue said:
This thread proves that there just can't and won't ever be and kind of discourse between left and right leaning individuals.

Charlie Kirk came out with a lot of pretty batshit things, that's undeniable. He was the poster boy for American Conservatism and genuinely some of his views were like he was sucked out of 1957 - largely to whip up right wing hysteria while farming clicks/views to monetise his political influencer career. I very much doubt he believed half of the rhetoric he came out with.

But fundamentally what happened yesterday was abhorrent. Right or left you should be allowed to air your views without the concern of violence coming your way, least of all on the horrific scale of what happened to Charlie.

What's happening in the US is pretty concerning to say the least. The polarised gulf between both ends of the spectrum is getting wider and these incidents only serve to increase that gap and entrench partisan views further.

I do feel it's lost as a country and the increasing tension which is building is only going to end in more mindless violence being committed.
Click to expand...
That pretty all encompassing if most of how we all feel mate
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:46 AM
  • #13,820
David O'Day said:
That is good advice for yourself.
Click to expand...

Who have I tried to cancel?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:47 AM
  • #13,821
mmttww said:
then he either didn't know what the word meant or he was being misleading which for a bloke that supported the conspiracy theories he did, would not be a surprise.
Click to expand...

So what if he did? David Icke supports conspiracy theories. Does that make him a bad person?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:48 AM
  • #13,822
bigfatronssba said:
Yes, strong remainer beliefs

Some people found her very polarising. She was very outspoken
Click to expand...

Funny because I don't remember Jo Cox ever saying that a few deaths (presumably including school children and other innocents) were worth it to retain the rights of every man and his dog to hold lethal weapons.

I don't remember her supporting the attempted violent overthrow of a democratically elected government.

Equating Jo Cox to Charlie Kirk is, frankly, an absolute insult to her.

Similarly with Owen Jones or if you prefer Boris Johnson or other 'polarising' figures on the right or left. None of them have ever advocated for political violence or suggested that a few schoolchildren dying was a fair price for their chosen beliefs (I draw the line here at those suggesting that sinking boats in the middle of the Channel is somehow acceptable).

Just to avoid doubt, violence is never the answer to anything, and I would never advocate for it. But if Kirk was content to accept the deaths of others to protect second amendment rights, am I supposed to feel sorry that he's now one of them?

Perhaps he wasn't thinking of himself when he said it, but in essence it seems that he's just died for his cause.

If it troubles you, do what he did for all of those children that died in school shootings - pray for him.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:48 AM
  • #13,823
Sky Blue Pete said:
The person committing the violence but and it’s quite a big one we have laws about inciting hatred and inciting violence so there’s clearly some aspects of what we do that does contribute to something

Nothing (but you have to be careful with this as there are caveats) excuses the taking of another persons life)

Apart from maybe war
Self defence
Defending someone else
If they’ve already taken someone’s life - death penalty

You can see how it’s not binary I mean dom and others want people guilty of sexual assault to be killed
Click to expand...

If nothing excuses taking another life, Charlie Kirk’s opinions and beliefs are irrelevant to his murder aren’t they?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:49 AM
  • #13,824
duffer said:
Funny because I don't remember Jo Cox ever saying that a few deaths (presumably including school children and other innocents) were worth it to retain the rights of every man and his dog to hold lethal weapons.

I don't remember her supporting the attempted violent overthrow of a democratically elected government.

Equating Jo Cox to Charlie Kirk is, frankly, an absolute insult to her.

Similarly with Owen Jones or if you prefer Boris Johnson or other 'polarising' figures on the right or left. None of them have ever advocated for political violence or suggested that a few schoolchildren dying was a fair price for their chosen beliefs (I draw the line here at those suggesting that sinking boats in the middle of the Channel is somehow acceptable).

Just to avoid doubt, violence is never the answer to anything, and I would never advocate for it. But if Kirk was content to accept the deaths of others to protect second amendment rights, am I supposed to feel sorry that he's now one of them?

Perhaps he wasn't thinking of himself when he said it, but in essence it seems that he's just died for his cause.

If it troubles you, do what he did for all of those children that died in school shootings - pray for him.
Click to expand...

Who decides what is and isn’t polarising?
You?
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:49 AM
  • #13,825
bigfatronssba said:
Learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation
Click to expand...

No one here has said Kirk should have been cancelled. Plenty disagreed with him. So I'm not sure what your point is?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 393
  • 394
  • 395
  • 396
  • 397
  • …
  • 401
Next
First Prev 395 of 401 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • xcraigx3 minutes ago
  • chiefdave3 minutes ago
  • TomRad854 minutes ago
  • Marty6 minutes ago
  • tisza8 minutes ago
  • SBAndy11 minutes ago
  • Ccfc_Addy14 minutes ago
  • ... and 3 more.
  • Total: 19 (members: 10, guests: 9)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Off Topic Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?