CCFC_Charlie
Well-Known Member
Two reasons, 1. Eisa is 4 years younger and more clubs were in for him and 2. We’re awful at holding out for a decent fee and tend to value our players way too low.
Two reasons, 1. Eisa is 4 years younger and more clubs were in for him and 2. We’re awful at holding out for a decent fee and tend to value our players way too low.My point is, on paper we had a player with a history of scoring goals in previous years, who actually scored more goals than eisa (who could well be a one season wonder), we are now a team who everyone believes will be going for a second promotion in the division above and yet Cheltenham have managed to wangle more money. How?
We don't know the terms of the Eisa deal do we?
Performance, appearance related content etc .
I was led to believe McNulty's deal could reach £1.5M should certain criteria be met.
Eisa is 24. Mm is 25 according to wiki anywayTwo reasons, 1. Eisa is 4 years younger and more clubs were in for him and 2. We’re awful at holding out for a decent fee and tend to value our players way too low.
Of course it does WingyWhich comes back to the player.
I can't believe people appear more worried about the striker situation than us messing about with 3 at the back. We do have a few players who could excel in a 3-5-2 but the formation requires a higher technical standard from the back 3 + wingbacks/GK. It's high risk for me - to unlock the maximum potential of a couple of players it requires the whole team to play at a higher level and that's why so few teams do it below the very top level. The defenders all need to be comfortable on the ball under pressure and in terms of carrying the ball forward into midfield and I don't think we have enough pieces of the puzzle to play it long term especially if we were to get an injury to Hyam/Sterling. Also the thought of Burge playing behind a back 3 scares the shit out of me - he'll get the ball to his feet and be expected to pass it accurately so much more and it's already the weakest part of his game. Really can't see a 3-5-2 lasting beyond September especially once the pitches start to deteriorate and then you'd have to question why we wasted a pre-season on it. Could be a suicidal move in terms of our promotion aspirations.
Doesn’t seem to be any good for the football club when they have follow on payments as they seem to disappear like Maddison’s must have
At least he's trying it in preseason though. I believe only top level players can really pull off a back three. Hopefully we ditch it by the start of the season.I can't believe people appear more worried about the striker situation than us messing about with 3 at the back. We do have a few players who could excel in a 3-5-2 but the formation requires a higher technical standard from the back 3 + wingbacks/GK. It's high risk for me - to unlock the maximum potential of a couple of players it requires the whole team to play at a higher level and that's why so few teams do it below the very top level. The defenders all need to be comfortable on the ball under pressure and in terms of carrying the ball forward into midfield and I don't think we have enough pieces of the puzzle to play it long term especially if we were to get an injury to Hyam/Sterling. Also the thought of Burge playing behind a back 3 scares the shit out of me - he'll get the ball to his feet and be expected to pass it accurately so much more and it's already the weakest part of his game. Really can't see a 3-5-2 lasting beyond September especially once the pitches start to deteriorate and then you'd have to question why we wasted a pre-season on it. Could be a suicidal move in terms of our promotion aspirations.
Into the costs of running a football club - the same as your wages disappear into various different directions. When we sign a new player, we never ask 'how are we paying his wages?' Whenever we sell one, immediately 'where is the money going?'
Chill out people, 2 weeks left something will happen, MR isnt thick. No need to panic buy just yet.
You cant compare the Eisa McNulty deals. One was between two managers who are father and son and the other was a total stitch up by a club and an agent.
Plenty on here were less than impressed when MM signed on a free but that ended up well even after a slow start. MR knows a good striker when he sees one so give him time
Ben Breeton of forest make mentioned as a loan signing - good shout if they’d let him go
As the striker Reuben Hepburn-Murphy from villa on loan possibly
Have you got a link?I just read the same article !
NewsNow: Loading story...Have you got a link?
Doesn’t seem to be any good for the football club when they have follow on payments as they seem to disappear like Maddison’s must have
Stopped reading at 'should'
He has no idea about the football side of things, typical nopm clown.Maybe the Maddison money is covering the differential in wages of Agogo and Brown bs stokes and Haynes?
I don’t know but the point is neither do you.
My mistake, was under the impression Eisa was 21. Especially poor business on our part in that case.Eisa is 24. Mm is 25 according to wiki anyway
My mistake, was under the impression Eisa was 21. Especially poor business on our part in that case.
He's from Senegal. The last African player we had claimed to be 34 but was more likely 64My mistake, was under the impression Eisa was 21. Especially poor business on our part in that case.
Maybe the Maddison money is covering the differential in wages of Agogo and Brown bs stokes and Haynes?
I don’t know but the point is neither do you.
He has no idea about the football side of things, typical nopm clown.
Doesn’t seem to be any good for the football club when they have follow on payments as they seem to disappear like Maddison’s must have
He has no idea about the football side of things, typical nopm clown.
He has no idea about the football side of things, typical nopm clown.
How did this happen? TerryGibsonsPerm post labelled with my account name? Glitch in the matrix...
View attachment 10229
same mould as Biamou and JCH?Also Wigan looking for sell Striker devante Cole as well
The exception that proves..Yeah Doyle was a disaster last year ;-)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?