This poll is ridiculous. if we had won 4-1 last night I guarantee the results would be the other way round. Just people knee jerking after a pointless friendly.
I wonder if all the Man City fans are calling for Mancini's head after they lost to Oldham last night...
This poll is ridiculous. if we had won 4-1 last night I guarantee the results would be the other way round. Just people knee jerking after a pointless friendly.
I wonder if all the Man City fans are calling for Mancini's head after they lost to Oldham last night...
Yep, I have said they should be done often so that we can see which way people are swaying. I am personally happy in 3 months time when we are hammering the league to say I think he is up to the job and I am wrong
call me cynical nick, but the timing of the poll is questionable. After the result that also counts for nothing against Hinckley there was no poll.
call me cynical nick, but the timing of the poll is questionable. After the result that also counts for nothing against Hinckley there was no poll.
Come off it I've never seen so much anti thorn stuff on here looks like supporters have woken up to reality at last.
This poll is ridiculous. if we had won 4-1 last night I guarantee the results would be the other way round. Just people knee jerking after a pointless friendly.
I wonder if all the Man City fans are calling for Mancini's head after they lost to Oldham last night...
I'm in the 'don't know' section. It's way too soon be be judge and jury.
I only made it because somebody asked if more people were Anti Thorn now. Feel free to make one 2 months into the season?
Only 54 % of people think at is not the man for the job. This immediately after we were spanked 4 - 1 by Wrexham.
Must say my faith in common sense has been restored, thought there would be a massive knee jerk reaction and this would be about 80 %.
Personaly I think the I don't know camp are right.
This us the time to judge him. Now he has been free to make some signings.
Look in the other thread then where there are a few listed
Seems the majority want The Clueless One out
If I could qualifty your statement for accuracy, dear chap, a marginal majority of people who could be motivated to vote on a particular forum with regards a poll that was timed just after a poor run of form voted so.
If the same poll had taken place just after the Hinckley game, I suggest a different result would have manifested itself. But we didn't have one then, did we. Wonder why?
Just a coincidence I am sure
Only a few people made any sensible suggestions though - it's interesting that for all the Thorn out talk there is little in the way of constructive alternative offered
Is Thorn up to the job as a manager? Nothing to do with his hands being tied, nothing to do with the tools he has had, just as a manager.
It is still interesting that for the Thorn In talk only Nonleague has explained why he thinks Thorn is a decent manager...
This is interesting.. The Yes/No/DK question is nice and simple, and as another member(s) points out, to examine it longitudinally would help us to appreciate how opinion shifts over time. I wonder if you can capture regular snapshots then compare the data.
Is it possible to develop a more complex poll or survey, that clarifies the basis behind people's answers? my reason for asking is that many people's true answers would be "no, but" or "yes, but". I think it would be worthwhile mapping out peoples overall satisfaction towards the club, and model this relationship against a number of independent variables (everything from ticket price down to the managerial staff).
Since there are probably hundreds of users on this site (many whom understand the workings of the club and its history) it could provide a reliable source on information on fans opinions. I'm not saying that anyone involved with the club would read the forum - but many posts on here are aimed at lobbying an issue, or rallying support around a particular cause. Imagine if a survey of 200 users showed that there was dwindling satisfaction in the club, and that some analysis of these variables showed that Thorn was the primary contributing factor to this. Or imagine if there was no statistically significant relationship between Thorn and overall feeling to the club.
Sorry to bang on...I'm a research/statistician and the poll made me think there might be opportunity to investigate this. My feeling towards the club after 20 years are lower than ever but my personal reasons for this are down to several things, am sure this is the case for many.
Anyway just a thought. PUSB
People are bored generally with my posts. However they must be particularly bored with how many times I have explained why I think he must be given a chance.
If I could qualifty your statement for accuracy, dear chap, a marginal majority of people who could be motivated to vote on a particular forum with regards a poll that was timed just after a poor run of form voted so.
If the same poll had taken place just after the Hinckley game, I suggest a different result would have manifested itself. But we didn't have one then, did we. Wonder why?
People are bored generally with my posts. However they must be particularly bored with how many times I have explained why I think he must be given a chance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?