But isn't that the equivalent of me saying something like "I don't like the Lib Dems, I was opposed to them screwing all the students over" and you telling me to join the party and become and MP. Why would somebody get involved in a group that seem to have an opposing point of view. The trust should be representative of the wider fan base and not just members that are at meeting or they are never going to get wider support, hence the political party analogy. I'd be much more supportive of the trust if there were actions against SISU as well as pressure and criticism of Wasps and CCC. If this were to happen I see the trust as being more favourable, as I think others would too, this would lead to a greater membership and representation the fanbase as a whole, thus leading to having more power and influence. It seems obvious to me. But then any criticism of the trust turns into people "crying" or being "hypocrites" - more division which is exactly the opposite of what we want, why is constructive criticism such a bad thing?