O'Brien killed the Texans for probably next 4-5 years.I can't believe the Texans traded away Hopkins for F all and have no first round picks for the next two years.
Big turnaround from their defence which TBF has been poor. Carroll stopped the run whilst bringing pressure - strong game plan.Murray can't do his magic from the floor. Great win for the Seahawks. Great game, glad I'm off work today!
Being able to hand the ball off to Carlos Hyde must have been a big relief for Russ. Scarborough had a couple of decent runs too.Big turnaround from their defence which TBF has been poor. Carroll stopped the run whilst bringing pressure - strong game plan.
watched Fields last night- had the worst game i've seen him play but still could be a franchise QB. Indiana defense is decent.We need a long term option at QB though, was hoping for a shot at Fields or Wilson so I don't want us to win too many, accidentally winning the NFCE with a losing record and picking 19th could be terrible. Loads of cap space though to add a wide receiver, O-line, and some DBs. Would love to see them have a play at Ju-Ju who is going to be a free agent.
Burrow didn't look good, can see them losing the rest now but then being able to take Sewell which will actually give Joe a chance next year.
Edit - and a TE
Jerry Jones' face on Thanksgiving is often a joy to behold.
Their remaining schedule isWentz is getting a right pummelling every week at the moment, so I am not even sure he will last the season.
Aren't they against Seattle this weekend?
Yeah Seahawks v Eagles Monday. The Seahawks rank 2nd in sacks over the last few games too.Wentz is getting a right pummelling every week at the moment, so I am not even sure he will last the season.
Aren't they against Seattle this weekend?
only 2 there - Lawrence & Fields.Although I really don’t want to end up drafting 19th after an embarrassing playoff loss and not having a franchise QB in sight.
I'd even say Fields isn't a slam dunk. I like Wilson but it could just be recency bias as he's in good form, Lance I don't think there is enough of a sample size to really tell. Trask, Jones etc. are definitely development guys, I guess if we're keeping Smith it's not a bad idea to be drafting one of them. It would be nice to have some constancy at the position, we've had 6/7 different starters at QB in the last season and a half.only 2 there - Lawrence & Fields.
Next 5 or 6 are all prospects that could need time - something we're seeing teams won't give young QBs. But teams are desperate and maybe as many as 5 go first round. Vikings pick top 10 they'll probably go QB - below that and they may look elsewhere.
Confident in Fields - may not be Lawrence but not far off. More mobile and doesn't have the receivers that Lawrence has at Clemson.I'd even say Fields isn't a slam dunk. I like Wilson but it could just be recency bias as he's in good form, Lance I don't think there is enough of a sample size to really tell. Trask, Jones etc. are definitely development guys, I guess if we're keeping Smith it's not a bad idea to be drafting one of them. It would be nice to have some constancy at the position, we've had 6/7 different starters at QB in the last season and a half.
I still think Washington would like to go QB in the first if possible. Smith won't be extended past next season and it's a major cliff edge if we have to draft and play straight away.Confident in Fields - may not be Lawrence but not far off. More mobile and doesn't have the receivers that Lawrence has at Clemson.
Wilson and Lance got talent but really haven't played anyone.
Intriguing one is Jones. Everyone just assumed after Tua he'd be a return to the likes of Hurts & McCarron. But he's got a great arm, accurate and mobile enough. Temperament seems good. Putting up numbers similar to Burrow in a slightly more conventional offense than LSU had.
But playing behind probably best protection in college football and again has great receivers (even though Waddle got injured). Downside (like Haskins) will be number of games he's started by the time the draft comes.
That's the problem this season (because it isn't a good one) that a 6-10 record could still see teams picking around 15-20.ooking at the draft order though there is lot of teams that would possibly look at having a long term replacement in above us at the moment.
Who would you want Vikes to be looking at?That's the problem this season (because it isn't a good one) that a 6-10 record could still see teams picking around 15-20.
Figure as many as 11 teams looking at QBs (if you include Saints & maybe Cowboys). Bears,Vikings, Falcons, Patriots, Cowboys,49ers could all be in the mix around Washington with 5-6 wins and looking at QBs.
It's all down to whether they can cut/trade cousins.Who would you want Vikes to be looking at?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?