Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
That is how it comes across.
That is how it comes across.Not at all.
Not at all.
It's why it's a bit harsh that you are somehow trying to explain on behalf of somebody else.
It's not much different to Boddy taking the shite because of others above him.
It reads exactly like that when the trust refuse to have their name alongside other fans groups on a statement asking for nothing more than talks to be held with a view to us still having somewhere to play next season.Not at all.
That is how it comes across.
Point taken on board.
That's the thing, I don't doubt you will take it on board. I do doubt anybody else would do anything anywhere even slightly different.
Like the other bloke on the board said, The views on here don't represent city fans.
Its really that simple. Not sure how the trust manage to make it so complicated.I want our club to survive no matter what. I don't want our club to survive only if the owners drop legals.
Everyone on here is a City fan and deserve to get their voices heard. That’s partly what a Supporters Trust is supposed to be there for. If voices aren’t being heard then it’s partly down to myself and others within the Trusts leadership. I will take this all forward.
If the Trust issue a statement stating they they would agree if "despite the on-going court case" was dropped it is saying that they fully support the action that Wasps is taking.
I previously thought they had a hard job trying to represent the many different views but to say that they would rather the club no longer existed if SISU continue the action is unbelievable from what is supposed to be a fans group wanting the best for CCFC
I don't think it is to do with you personally though. You come on here to do your best but in fairness to you why can't other people engage and listen to fans?
I have said for years the same has been going on, that there was no interest at all in listening properly. Like I said though it's as if you, Moz, Steve etc try your hardest and others end up just making it a nightmare for you.
If I’m partly or solely responsible for running something I’m party or solely responsible for the failings of the organisation.
Only so much you can do and only so far you can take something.
Which is why I said it doesn't really seem fair that you are willing to engage when most of the issues about the other people who have no interest in it.
The thing is that while we would all like to be rid of SISU there is a more pressing issue and if that is solved there will not be a club for anyone to own.If I’m partly or solely responsible for running something I’m party or solely responsible for the failings of the organisation.
The thing is that while we would all like to be rid of SISU there is a more pressing issue and if that is solved there will not be a club for anyone to own.
It's beginning to look like the Trust board is more interested in preserving it's anti-Sisu credentials than in finding a way out of the mess we are in.
Not at all.
Everyone on here is a City fan and deserve to get their voices heard. That’s partly what a Supporters Trust is supposed to be there for. If voices aren’t being heard then it’s partly down to myself and others within the Trusts leadership. I will take this all forward.
That isn’t what we have tried to say at all. I can see how it reads that way though.
If the Trust issue a statement stating they they would agree if "despite the on-going court case" was dropped it is saying that they fully support the action that Wasps is taking.
I previously thought they had a hard job trying to represent the many different views but to say that they would rather the club no longer existed if SISU continue the action is unbelievable from what is supposed to be a fans group wanting the best for CCFC
I don't think the trust should read so much into this.
I don't think anyone would see them putting their name to this statement as an endorsement of the owners.
They might see it as them standing in solidarity with their fellow supporters groups to plead for securing the short term future of the club.
Massive own goal by the trust in my opinion.
The trust would only put their name to a declaration that they support the club if they could add ‘but not sisu’ at th end.
They openly hate sisu more than they love city. I don’t get it.
It's frustrating that a decent and well meaning statement has caused a riff rather than doing what it was intended to do.
Typical CCFC.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?