Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Summer transfer rumours (54 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Deity
  • Start date Mar 15, 2026
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
Next
First Prev 34 of 36 Next Last
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 7:52 AM
  • #1,156
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
2bf the rumour mill has cropped up a few names for Brighton suggesting they want to sign a new keeper
Click to expand...
There's some wonder kid they have been keen on,that one?
 

CovveeBreak

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:14 AM
  • #1,157
Calling it now: we 100% sign Rushworth.
 
Reactions: Milan's hair dye, junglej13, Evo1883 and 6 others

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:24 AM
  • #1,158
CovveeBreak said:
Calling it now: we 100% sign Rushworth.
Click to expand...

He wants us.
 
Reactions: Marty and Sky Blue Pete

CovveeBreak

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:31 AM
  • #1,159
AFCCOVENTRY said:
He wants us.
Click to expand...

He wants us / openly admits he loves it here
He knows without doubt he will be no1
Brighton clearly shopping around for a GK
Brighton set to make major profit on him regardless, fitting their model
DK and FL value "keeping the band together"
DK wants value for money - lad is only 24 and has a very high ceiling
DK loves to negotiate and will feel confident in getting a decent deal (can see him pushing for "if we survive relegation" clause to make it even more attractive to Brighton)
 
Reactions: Marty, Saddlebrains, I_Saw_Shaw_Score and 4 others

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:07 AM
  • #1,160
CovveeBreak said:
DK loves to negotiate and will feel confident in getting a decent deal (can see him pushing for "if we survive relegation" clause to make it even more attractive to Brighton)
Click to expand...

Would that be permitted, as we have to play them and it would create a conflict of interest?

Im not suggesting that Brighton would throw games, my point is about Premier League rules.
 

CovveeBreak

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:11 AM
  • #1,161
mrtrench said:
Would that be permitted, as we have to play them and it would create a conflict of interest?

Im not suggesting that Brighton would throw games, my point is about Premier League rules.
Click to expand...

Good question, and I'm honestly not sure.

My assumption would be this would still be fine, but I'm further away from the ins and outs of football contracts than Leicester City are away from financial security, so can't call myself an authority here.
 
Reactions: DazzleTommyDazzle

Winny the Bish

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:15 AM
  • #1,162
Would Brighton turn down £10m+ of FFP 'pure profit' on a GK with just a year left on his contract?

I doubt it.
 
Reactions: Milan's hair dye and Sky Blue Pete

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:18 AM
  • #1,163
Winny the Bish said:
Would Brighton turn down £10m+ of FFP 'pure profit' on a GK with just a year left on his contract?

I doubt it.
Click to expand...
They'd turn down anything below £15m id imagine
 
Reactions: KNSB

Manchester_sky_blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:19 AM
  • #1,164
Deity said:
The club want him, he wants to stay …. It’s now about the money ( fee and package ) … it could get too rich for us, we all hope not.
Click to expand...
We don't know that he wants to stay. He's made positive comments about his time here and hinted he would be open to staying but that doesn't mean he isn't going to look at other offers and he won't be short of options.
 

CovveeBreak

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:23 AM
  • #1,165
Manchester_sky_blue said:
We don't know that he wants to stay. He's made positive comments about his time here and hinted he would be open to staying but that doesn't mean he isn't going to look at other offers and he won't be short of options.
Click to expand...

Wanting to stay and being open to other offers/not being short of options can both be true.
 
Reactions: Manchester_sky_blue

HuckerbysQuiff

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:23 AM
  • #1,166
With Rushworth I can see an option for Brighton to buy back being a potential if we do get him. Few clubs throwing that in now, so wouldn’t be surprised.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:24 AM
  • #1,167
HuckerbysQuiff said:
With Rushworth I can see an option for Brighton to buy back being a potential if we do get him. Few clubs throwing that in now, so wouldn’t be surprised.
Click to expand...
Cant see Doug agreeing to that
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:26 AM
  • #1,168
What is value?
£10m definitely
£15m I’m not so sure
 
Reactions: JPG77 and Speedie's Head
S

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:33 AM
  • #1,169
Sky Blue Pete said:
What is value?
£10m definitely
£15m I’m not so sure
Click to expand...
£15m for a GK unproven in the PL is huge. They'll be much greater value elsewhere
 
Reactions: stupot07, HJones23 and JPG77

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:42 AM
  • #1,170
mrtrench said:
Would that be permitted, as we have to play them and it would create a conflict of interest?

Im not suggesting that Brighton would throw games, my point is about Premier League rules.
Click to expand...
Really good spot and last day of the season, we need a win and they are playing for nothing, it creates a perceived conflict of interest at least. Would a way around it be if he makes 40 premier league appearances for us then it triggers an extra payment? It's in effect the same clause as he would only hit that number early in season two if we stayed up.
 

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:47 AM
  • #1,171
HuckerbysQuiff said:
With Rushworth I can see an option for Brighton to buy back being a potential if we do get him. Few clubs throwing that in now, so wouldn’t be surprised.
Click to expand...
I can see it being a clause tied to us getting relegated either that or they have option to match any accepted bids
 
Reactions: HuckerbyDublinWhelan

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:49 AM
  • #1,172
Is PL experience as important for a GK?

being simplistic but a shot is a shot right?
 
Reactions: SleepyGinger, chohan and Ccfcisparks

SleepyGinger

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:53 AM
  • #1,173
Speedie's Head said:
£15m for a GK unproven in the PL is huge. They'll be much greater value elsewhere
Click to expand...
If he’s available for £15m I’d snap their hand off. He is a premier league goal keeper.
 
Reactions: skybluecam and Marty

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:01 AM
  • #1,174
Winny the Bish said:
Would Brighton turn down £10m+ of FFP 'pure profit' on a GK with just a year left on his contract?

I doubt it.
Click to expand...
They have the option of triggering an addition year, so it's effectively 2 years left on his contract.
 
W

woody11462

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:10 AM
  • #1,175
shmmeee said:
Is PL experience as important for a GK?

being simplistic but a shot is a shot right?
Click to expand...
Agree with this. I suppose every keeper has to get premier league experience by playing there for the first time at some point. He looks like he could handle whatever is thrown at him. Might be a few mistakes at the start but as long as we back him regardless, he should go on to play there for his career.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:11 AM
  • #1,176
I think even if we signed Rushworth we would need an experienced older keeper
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:13 AM
  • #1,177
woody11462 said:
Agree with this. I suppose every keeper has to get premier league experience by playing there for the first time at some point. He looks like he could handle whatever is thrown at him. Might be a few mistakes at the start but as long as we back him regardless, he should go on to play there for his career.
Click to expand...

You’re not up against an opposition player as much really right? If you’re a winger up against faster and stronger fullbacks that’s a much bigger difference. Maybe you’re against harder shots or players who can beat you from positions others couldn’t but the raw physical differences don’t matter so much.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:14 AM
  • #1,178
shmmeee said:
You’re not up against an opposition player as much really right? If you’re a winger up against faster and stronger fullbacks that’s a much bigger difference. Maybe you’re against harder shots or players who can beat you from positions others couldn’t but the raw physical differences don’t matter so much.
Click to expand...
Have you not seen the issues defending set pieces this year?
 

Milan's hair dye

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:14 AM
  • #1,179
SleepyGinger said:
I’d guess their plan is sell Verbruggen and promote Rushworth, making Rushworth seem available is helping drive Verbruggen price up.
Click to expand...
Said it a few weeks ago, they are shopping and have potentially 55m+ on keeper sale fees this window.
That's a lot of return for 2 keepers
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:16 AM
  • #1,180
shmmeee said:
Is PL experience as important for a GK?

being simplistic but a shot is a shot right?
Click to expand...
I'd imagine it is. League is quicker, stronger and the experience is different. Rushworth hasn't really played against sides that put him under pressure every game. Swansea were decent with him, as are we.

He's going to have less time when he tries to pass from the back, its going to be a new speed for him to get upto scratch.
 

Milan's hair dye

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:18 AM
  • #1,181
HuckerbysQuiff said:
With Rushworth I can see an option for Brighton to buy back being a potential if we do get him. Few clubs throwing that in now, so wouldn’t be surprised.
Click to expand...
Trafford is the world's biggest reason why I'd avoid buy back clauses.
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:18 AM
  • #1,182
mrtrench said:
Would that be permitted, as we have to play them and it would create a conflict of interest?

Im not suggesting that Brighton would throw games, my point is about Premier League rules.
Click to expand...
no conflict of interest, these clauses are built in all the time based on team success. Villa had one with Cameron Archer when he was at Sheff Utd, they had to buy him back on relegation.
 

HuckerbysQuiff

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:19 AM
  • #1,183
Ccfcisparks said:
Cant see Doug agreeing to that
Click to expand...
Depends on buy back value…. Let’s say it was an increase of £10m I think it’s a goer.

Think buy back based on relegation would be difficult to swallow but again you want something sometimes you have to bend a little. Either way I’d just like straight buy option and none of what I’ve said above
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:19 AM
  • #1,184
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
I'd imagine it is. League is quicker, stronger and the experience is different. Rushworth hasn't really played against sides that put him under pressure every game. Swansea were decent with him, as are we.

He's going to have less time when he tries to pass from the back, it’s going to be a new speed for him to get upto scratch.
Click to expand...

Oh there’s definitely differences but if you were to rank positions I’d put GK at the bottom of the list as he’s not physically competing like outfield players are.
 
Reactions: HuckerbyDublinWhelan

HuckerbysQuiff

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:21 AM
  • #1,185
Milan's hair dye said:
Trafford is the world's biggest reason why I'd avoid buy back clauses.
Click to expand...
Burnley signed him for £19m and ‘could’ get back £31m not a bad deal if you want money…
 

Offhegoes

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:22 AM
  • #1,186
5 big signings, and a couple of highly regarded younger players (CM and a winger) to develop.

1) Carl Rushworth or a Top Keeper.
2) Centre Back
3) LB
4) AM / No.10
5) CF

Assuming Bassette, Wilson, Allen & Bidwell will be off. Rodrigues & Brau possibly too unless they get a 1 year loan deal

One of our 4 CBs will go (Woolf most likely) and I wouldn't be surpirsed to see one of BTA, Simms or Wright to move on, to make room for the new CF signing.

Sakamoto, EMC, Markelo & a young promising new winger to compete for the wide positions.
 

Milan's hair dye

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:25 AM
  • #1,187
HuckerbysQuiff said:
Burnley signed him for £19m and ‘could’ get back £31m not a bad deal if you want money…
Click to expand...
I think they'd have prefered a decent keeper that could stop a shot thou tbf.
Highest goals conceded in the league
 
S

skyblue025

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:26 AM
  • #1,188
Players have the power. If he tells Brighton he definitely wants to leave they aren't going to keep him. It will just be about the price which they are trying to ramp up by saying how much of a star he will be going forward.

They might rate him but clearly not that much as they have loaned him out 6 seasons in a row while keeping journeyman Jason Steel as their backup. He has never played a first team game for Brighton since they signed him. It looks like they think he is one they don't think of as a first team player but can be trained on and sold for profit.
 

Milan's hair dye

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:26 AM
  • #1,189
£12-15m
£5m if we stay up
+England appearance fee.

That'd get it over the line
 

HuckerbysQuiff

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:28 AM
  • #1,190
Milan's hair dye said:
I think they'd have prefered a decent keeper that could stop a shot thou tbf.
Highest goals conceded in the league
Click to expand...
Keeper would help I’ve got no doubt, yet team has 10 other plays to get past before. Can’t look at it in isolation completely, team close down etc etc there’s lack of shots. We’ve been bailed out by Rushworth plenty of times which I’m glad of, yet doesn’t always translate that way
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
Next
First Prev 34 of 36 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Busst To Write To Eduardo
  • torchomatic
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • Coventry City General Chat
2 3
Replies
76
Views
11K
Sep 18, 2025
LastGarrison
J
Villa Scum on Here
  • JuanDan petrolman
  • Feb 28, 2008
  • Coventry City General Chat
Replies
16
Views
7K
Mar 1, 2008
JuanDan petrolman
J
C
please don't pick on me!
  • COV & VILLA
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • Coventry City General Chat
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
Oct 6, 2010
Coventry La La La
Z
Vote for Zoe to be CCFC Soccerette 07/08
  • zoe
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • Coventry City General Chat
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
Mar 7, 2021
Gregbant
G
New Header Image!
  • Nick
  • Feb 29, 2008
  • Ask the Admin
Replies
15
Views
4K
Mar 6, 2008
Bunnykins
B

Users who are viewing this thread

  • AdeA moment ago
  • Sky Blue 19871 minute ago
  • Manchester_sky_blue3 minutes ago
  • gspotgaz3 minutes ago
  • CCFColi3 minutes ago
  • TomRad853 minutes ago
  • craigus124 minutes ago
  • ccfc_Tom5 minutes ago
  • stupot075 minutes ago
  • skyblumatt5 minutes ago
  • SBAndy5 minutes ago
  • DazzleTommyDazzle6 minutes ago
  • Harries117 minutes ago
  • beduth9 minutes ago
  • warwickskyblue10 minutes ago
  • mark8210 minutes ago
  • SkyBlue_CremeEgg11 minutes ago
  • grahamparsons6811 minutes ago
  • martynshipley12 minutes ago
  • Alkhen12 minutes ago
  • jonnyp1987113 minutes ago
  • ... and 8 more.
  • Total: 50 (members: 29, guests: 21)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?