Stadium update (68 Viewers)

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
During a CBSA tour earlier this month, the Arena head of operations (working for Frasers) said that Frasers had invested £13m in infrastructure in the first year after purchase so Frasers considered it a £30m investment (including the £17m purchase price). I suspect we’ve paid upwards of that as I’m sure they won’t be selling it at a loss.
Kind of agree with those guestimated valuations - £30m/40m ish.
DK offered £25m to the receivers when Wasps went bust, and that's without seeing any financial figures, and with multiple years of accrued maintenance to be funded.
Since then, tbf to Frasers, they started to fix up the stadium and make improvements.
Another thing to consider, which we've speculated on SBT many times before, is that finding anywhere in Coventry to build another stadium, was practically impossible.
Also the building costs involved with a new stadium are eye wateringly high eg this arena cost £113m, so if were buying it for £30m/£40m, that looks a bit of a bargain.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Large chunks of the administrative spending will be maintenance. Things you only do every 5/10 years that Wasps never did. The Turnover increase coupled with the Gross Margin increase are very impressive.
There was a spreadsheet when Wasps went bust detailing a huge amount (in the tens of millions) of maintenance that needed doing. Some of it pretty critical stuff like fire alarms and CCTV.

While I doubt that everything has been completed if a good chunk of that has been done then maybe we're not that much worse off than if King had bought the place when he bought the club.

In fact you could probably argue that having Kings focus on the club initially rather than having to deal with a run down stadium was an advantage.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
How much would it cost us to build our own stadium with casino hotel exhibition hall with 11,000 capacity and 3 car parks today ??
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I thought it was 96 as well. Not sure where I got that figure from to be honest.
I think the Council extended the original 100 year lease ACL had to 250 years when they sold the stadium to Wasps.
There was a spreadsheet when Wasps went bust detailing a huge amount (in the tens of millions) of maintenance that needed doing. Some of it pretty critical stuff like fire alarms and CCTV.

While I doubt that everything has been completed if a good chunk of that has been done then maybe we're not that much worse off than if King had bought the place when he bought the club.

In fact you could probably argue that having Kings focus on the club initially rather than having to deal with a run down stadium was an advantage.
Wasps valued it at £60m when they launched their bond scam. 😁
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I think the Council extended the original 100 year lease ACL had to 250 years when they sold the stadium to Wasps.

Wasps valued it at £60m when they launched their bond scam. 😁

Knew about the lease extension but for some reason thought Frasers had different terms, not sure where I got that from.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
How much would it cost us to build our own stadium with casino hotel exhibition hall with 11,000 capacity and 3 car parks today ??
over 9 figures and that wouldbe without all the Tesco bit etc (which obviously factored in the original land purchase and decontamination etc), I've got the actual arena build and furbishment costs somewhere.(separate from the tesco bit)
edit land purchase & decontamination etc 43 m (which Tesco sale covered) & 65m arena build and furbishment & 9m costs/fees
 
Last edited:

Hobo

Well-Known Member
There was a spreadsheet when Wasps went bust detailing a huge amount (in the tens of millions) of maintenance that needed doing. Some of it pretty critical stuff like fire alarms and CCTV.

While I doubt that everything has been completed if a good chunk of that has been done then maybe we're not that much worse off than if King had bought the place when he bought the club.

In fact you could probably argue that having Kings focus on the club initially rather than having to deal with a run down stadium was an advantage.

Let's be honest squatters would have looked after it better than Wasps.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
In regards to the stadium refurbishment.

The part of the stadium thats been painted navy blue by the glass by the away end looks fantastic and clean .

Wouldn't be against the entire end being painted that colour tbh
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
We have to see what difference the additional income makes by owning the ground and all that comes with it. Im 100% sure Doug knows exactly what he has, but by joining the 2 entities he will be looking to create other opportunities that will generate to increase the income for the club. He knows the value of 1 party ownership and will be happy to have the freedom of decision making that will give him.

Doug will put the best people in the right places to make us a very sustainable and profitable club. He has added unbelievable growth and value already and not sure he has any boundaries on where he wants to take us.

When he leaves this club none of us should forget where the club was off the field when he walked in. Yes we were doing well on the field, but its was a shambles off it and really was a dead duck. Today everything has improved and yer i still see him be able to do more.

Lets see what comes next...
 
Last edited:

theferret

Well-Known Member
In regards to the stadium refurbishment.

The part of the stadium thats been painted navy blue by the glass by the away end looks fantastic and clean .

Wouldn't be against the entire end being painted that colour tbh
Without wishing to create a blue dress controversy, it's anthracite grey, no? My eyes aren't exactly tip top though, so maybe it's me.
 

SkyBlueBarmy84

Well-Known Member
For those (incredibly) still debating whether this is a positive move…

It’s like buying a house with a mortgage; there will be interest to pay on the loan, but at the end of the term, you own an asset vs. renting where you don’t get anything back.

As with a mortgage, you need a chunky deposit - that’s where I think the £15m from earlier in the summer comes in 👀 - so, if we assume that’s 40% of the asset value, and we’re borrowing on a 35 year term, with a 4% rate of interest:

- Arena value: £37.5m
- Loan (borrowed): £22.5m
- Monthly repayment: ~£99,624
- Annual repayment: ~£1.20m

So, for approx. the same amount that we were allegedly paying in rent per year, we are paying towards truly owning our own ‘home’ - with the incentive of new revenue streams to offset the loan repayment (assuming the various assets aren’t loss making). If they are loss making, then we reset / reconsider the usage. This all requires working capital, of course, but thats the same with any business.

Either way, I think the medium / long term outlook is very encouraging!
 

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
For those (incredibly) still debating whether this is a positive move…

It’s like buying a house with a mortgage; there will be interest to pay on the loan, but at the end of the term, you own an asset vs. renting where you don’t get anything back.

As with a mortgage, you need a chunky deposit - that’s where I think the £15m from earlier in the summer comes in 👀 - so, if we assume that’s 40% of the asset value, and we’re borrowing on a 35 year term, with a 4% rate of interest:

- Arena value: £37.5m
- Loan (borrowed): £22.5m
- Monthly repayment: ~£99,624
- Annual repayment: ~£1.20m

So, for approx. the same amount that we were allegedly paying in rent per year, we are paying towards truly owning our own ‘home’ - with the incentive of new revenue streams to offset the loan repayment (assuming the various assets aren’t loss making). If they are loss making, then we reset / reconsider the usage. This all requires working capital, of course, but thats the same with any business.

Either way, I think the medium / long term outlook is very encouraging!
King did say everything was 100% owned by the club. I wasn't assuming a loan/mortgage from that statement. With the way that the club structures its assets perhaps the football side will pay into the estate side of things. It's probably too early to say.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
King did say everything was 100% owned by the club. I wasn't assuming a loan/mortgage from that statement. With the way that the club structures its assets perhaps the football side will pay into the estate side of things. It's probably too early to say.
You'd have to say though , we are a much more attractive club for investors than we were 48 hours ago .

An 11,000 capacity exhibition hall too .. so much potential to be tapped into
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
How much would it cost us to build our own stadium with casino hotel exhibition hall with 11,000 capacity and 3 car parks today ??

£350m + I reckon. Everton new stadium has cost £800m.
 

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
Clubs worth more , more valuable to potential investors / new owners in future ?
Of course. I said up thread that the value of the club probably doubled overnight. I'm not sure what you're getting at.

I do know how bean counters work though and if the "football club" stops paying "rent" to the "Arena" the Arena's paper losses suddenly increase. I was saying that it'll be interesting to see how that all works out in the future and how the "business" is structured.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Of course. I said up thread that the value of the club probably doubled overnight. I'm not sure what you're getting at.

I do know how bean counters work though and if the "football club" stops paying "rent" to the "Arena" the Arena's paper losses suddenly increase. I was saying that it'll be interesting to see how that all works out in the future and how the "business" is structured.
Sorry speedie I wasnt really getting at anything tbh 😂 just excited about the endless potential of the arena ( hall, Hotel and casino )and how now the club is just much more attractive now with it all together


I feel like previous arena owners never really tapped fully into the potential at the stadium and there's so much more to be made from it financially
 

Martw

Well-Known Member
Clubs worth more , more valuable to potential investors / new owners in future ?
The club is worth. Lot more than it was on Friday, the whole package is definitely more attractive to investors / potential buyers. It will be so interesting to see what happens over the next 2-3 years with the venue
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top