What do people think about the decision to promote Dean Austin to Sporting Director and Jamie Johnson to Head of Recruitment?
Was promoting from within the right move, or should Doug King have looked outside the club and spoken to people with experience at Premier League level?
The step up to the Premier League was the biggest moment the club has faced in years, so I do wonder whether that was the time to bring in someone who had already worked at that level.
There are people with much more experience in the Sporting Director / Director of Football roles, such as Paul Mitchell, who has worked at Southampton, Spurs, RB Leipzig, Monaco and Newcastle, Dougie Freedman from Crystal Palace, Mike Rigg, who has worked at Manchester City and Fulham, and Kevin Thelwell, who has Premier League experience and previously worked with Lampard at Everton.
I'm not saying any of them would necessarily have wanted the job or been realistic appointments, but I think it is fair to ask whether the club should have looked more widely before promoting Austin.
Austin had done a good job in recruitment, but Sporting Director / Director of Football is a much bigger role, especially when you are trying to build a squad capable of staying in the Premier League.
Same with Johnson. He may turn out to be very good, but we have effectively promoted both of the main recruitment positions internally at the exact point the club has moved up to a completely different level.
Was that the right decision, or should Doug King have brought in people with Premier League experience?
Was promoting from within the right move, or should Doug King have looked outside the club and spoken to people with experience at Premier League level?
The step up to the Premier League was the biggest moment the club has faced in years, so I do wonder whether that was the time to bring in someone who had already worked at that level.
There are people with much more experience in the Sporting Director / Director of Football roles, such as Paul Mitchell, who has worked at Southampton, Spurs, RB Leipzig, Monaco and Newcastle, Dougie Freedman from Crystal Palace, Mike Rigg, who has worked at Manchester City and Fulham, and Kevin Thelwell, who has Premier League experience and previously worked with Lampard at Everton.
I'm not saying any of them would necessarily have wanted the job or been realistic appointments, but I think it is fair to ask whether the club should have looked more widely before promoting Austin.
Austin had done a good job in recruitment, but Sporting Director / Director of Football is a much bigger role, especially when you are trying to build a squad capable of staying in the Premier League.
Same with Johnson. He may turn out to be very good, but we have effectively promoted both of the main recruitment positions internally at the exact point the club has moved up to a completely different level.
Was that the right decision, or should Doug King have brought in people with Premier League experience?
