bradwellskyblues
Well-Known Member
Simon gilbert has just said on cwr that the indemnity is to protect our friends at CCC WHO ARE THE THIRD PARTY this allows wasps to say there is no indemnity for them
I think it’s fair to say though that on this occasion SISU through the club are telling the truth just not the whole truth while other parties just aren’t telling any truth.But there’s telling the truth but not telling the whole truth and to me that seems to be the issue with all parties in this fiasco.
Just to be clear, Gilbert said CCC are not a party on the NDA, but are named in the indemnity that Wasps want CCFC/SISU to sign.Simon gilbert has just said on cwr that the indemnity is to protect our friends at CCC WHO ARE THE THIRD PARTY this allows wasps to say there is no indemnity for them
He didn't say or infer anything about whether the Council had asked for the indemnity. He did use the phrase off the record and that he'd heard it from more than one place. I'd suspect his sources are Boddy and Street.Did he say that? As a journalist he’d need to have the evidence to back that up
Doesn’t he suggest they are rather than say categorically? He’s a bit more independent of the parties than other journalists thoughJust to be clear, Gilbert said CCC are not a party on the NDA, but are named in the indemnity that Wasps want CCFC/SISU to sign.
The parties on the NDA are Wasps, CCFC, Delaware North and Andy Street
He was very explicit on who was on the NDADoesn’t he suggest they are rather than say categorically? He’s a bit more independent of the parties than other journalists though
I’m just going on his twitter stuff I didn’t hear it so thanksHe was very explicit on who was on the NDA
Makes wasps there’s too many parties line a little disingenuousThis isn’t news?
We knew this already. It was blatantly obvious. Have I missed something?
Well it confirms a few things. People have had different points of view on whether the Council were on the NDA or not. We now know they're not. It had also been suggested Delaware were likely on it, and now we know they areThis isn’t news?
We knew this already. It was blatantly obvious. Have I missed something?
Well it confirms a few things. People have had different points of view on whether the Council were on the NDA or not. We now know they're not. It had also been suggested Delaware were likely on it, and now we know they are
Makes wasps there’s too many parties line a little disingenuous
It’s also the likely remedy isn’t it if the state aid claim goes against ccc. Seems strange for any party to say to Sisu. If the authorities find me and my mate were at fault for something that negatively affected you then we would like you to cover this please. Um no thanksOh not the NDA. That was always a red herring. But we knew Wasps wanted Sisu to halt legal action against anyone to do with the Ricoh, they’ve said as much Repeatedly. Why wouldn’t that include CCC? Seems blatantly obvious I’m confused why it’s a revelation?
It’s also the likely remedy isn’t it if the state aid claim goes against ccc. Seems strange for any party to say to Sisu. If the authorities find me and my mate were at fault for something that negatively affected you then we would like you to cover this please. Um no thanks
I think it clears up once and for all that the indemnity exists (after Wasps said it didn't) and now there is a definitive reason for the talks to have broken down. Maybe it's just me, but what I heard gave me more clarity, where before, there was some well founded speculationOh not the NDA. That was always a red herring. But we knew Wasps wanted Sisu to halt legal action against anyone to do with the Ricoh, they’ve said as much Repeatedly. Why wouldn’t that include CCC? Seems blatantly obvious I’m confused why it’s a revelation?
I think it clears up once and for all that the indemnity exists (after Wasps said it didn't) and now there is a definitive reason for the talks to have broken down. Maybe it's just me, but what I heard gave me more clarity, where before, there was some well founded speculation
I haven’t heard simon so I don’t know if it has. I think it’s been suggested not confirmedSorry has this been confirmed? Because Wasps have repeatedly denied this and as I said I can’t see how it would work legally.
To be clear. Not on about the NDA. That was always a smokescreen and even if there were more parties wouldn’t have to have stopped Wasps and Sisu releasing what concerned only them
But people seem surprised the indemnity isn’t just against Wasps. That’s been the issue from the start since last year.
Talks broke down as CCFC couldn't sign an indemnity that prevented them from suing CCC in the future. The indemnity didn't include Wasps.Im lost. What exactly has been confirmed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?