They have called their bluff offering to drop the legals.
We have already seen the council try to block the butts.
Why so scared for the council to say "let's do it?"
Because the rest of us follow people blindly and are stupid.......They’ve offered themselves an out by “offering” to drop the legals with conditions. The council calling SISU’s bluff on that is letting the legals run their course.
She doesn’t say BPA she says CCFC’s own stadium. Why would you believe for one minute that she’s got any intentions on seeing a new stadium through.
For someone who pats themselves on the back thinking they’re clever for claiming other parties are playing games you’re very keen to take a ticket for this dance again. RFC will be back next.
Tbf, I don't read much into the council blocking attempts to develop the stadium. It is a perception rather than anything backed by evidence. Would like it to be true but it does feel a bit of stretch. SISU as a fairly litigious lot will know that a planning authority can only use its powers to apply planning laws, it can't just make shit up.
They’ve offered themselves an out by “offering” to drop the legals with conditions. The council calling SISU’s bluff on that is letting the legals run their course.
She doesn’t say BPA she says CCFC’s own stadium. Why would you believe for one minute that she’s got any intentions on seeing a new stadium through.
For someone who pats themselves on the back thinking they’re clever for claiming other parties are playing games you’re very keen to take a ticket for this dance again. RFC will be back next.
Who is following blindly? Who has said "yes sisu will build a stadium".Because the rest of us follow people blindly and are stupid.......
Remind you of anyone?
I haven't said anything about the bpa now.
The council have already said they would be prepared to help ccfc with things if the legals are dropped.
Why would you not want discussions to get underway at least? See how it goes?
If she has no intention, the council will have tried to help ccfc wouldn't they? Good pr for them.
I take the ticket for the ccfc dance every week sadly enough.
They can’t oppose planning because SISU are attempting and failing to sue them. They don’t even have the final say in the planning process.
She’s game playing. Again.
Who has said anything about opposing planning?
They can use authority and lean on people though to make things awkward.
What is there to be lost if they say "come down on Monday, let's talk about it"?
That's why their reply will be interesting.
Why do SISU have to drop the legals to go ahead with a stadium? Can’t they continue the legals and pursue a stadium? Who are they putting conditions on exactly if not themselves?
No different? Nick is on here under his own name giving his own opinion. The people he is referring to claim to be representatives of the fans and have multiple anonymous accounts to attack anyone who dares disagree with them. Not quite the same thing in my book.But why is it embarrassing just pushing what they believe, no differant to you.
Nobody has to fall for anything. What do we lose by pushing the council to go with this?Are people really going to fall for this SISU want to build a new ground nonsense again?
The council will also look the goodies trying to help ccfc.Nobody has to fall for anything. What do we lose by pushing the council to go with this?
If it's bollocks it will quickly unravel and SISU will look even more ridiculous than they usually do.
In the unlikely event it isn't bollocks we might finally move things forward.
Its a no lose situation.
That's not really news. Seppala admitted that in her interview with Reid years back.Before SISU took over. They are laying some blame on events that happened prior to their ownership but all that says to me is they did not do due diligence properly.
So you're saying he makes things up to tell the press?Funny how some those you pointed out were boycotting have been going up Dave sat with us last night, and your other mate was there on Friday, he was holding up the banner.
What about the King's Hill area just near Stoneleigh? That is in Warwick District Council, but adjacent to the CCC boundary, and they are planning on building 1500 houses there. Could include a stadium. There is also the Warwickshire Gateway site between the A45 and the airport - this is in Warwick District too, and a massive area of development ...
They don't have to drop them to go ahead with it do they.
They are saying what the council have kept saying "drop the legals and we will help". If they have been saying they will drop the legals in return for a bit of help then who's bullshitting?
Its simple, the council say "let's talk for the good of ccfc" and see where it goes. That's what the council have been publicly asking for.
There's been an "olive branch" given but ignored.
Nobody is saying the council should build a stadium for sisu or anything silly. Just explore to see what happens, even more so if the legals get dropped.
What's to lose?
It is no differant to you nick you must have written 100s of anti trust replies on multiple threads and accusing these people of not having CCFC at heart why else would they bother if they didn't.
Well I know Dave quite well and he only has CCFC at heart, just sees the situation differently to you
Nobody has to fall for anything. What do we lose by pushing the council to go with this?
If it's bollocks it will quickly unravel and SISU will look even more ridiculous than they usually do.
In the unlikely event it isn't bollocks we might finally move things forward.
Its a no lose situation.
So you're saying he makes things up to tell the press?
So they will get support and a deal at the ricoh with the legals?What olive branch? She offered to drop the legals if the council help her do something she can do anyway and if she can get an interim deal at the Ricoh which we already know is possible if she drops the legals? Are you really not seeing what an empty load of nonsense this is?
Surely people aren't really that stupid to not understand what is being asked. Of course if its as easy as you say then absolutely no reason for the council not to agree.To do what? She doesn’t need to drop the legals to push ahead with a new stadium.
She does she needs a deal at the Ricoh until she can get a job lot of bricks on the cheapTo do what? She doesn’t need to drop the legals to push ahead with a new stadium.
This is it. It’s the reverse of the “Nicks a Sisu plant” shit. When it’s him it’s obviously ridiculous when it’s someone else it’s an obvious conspiracy.
Look in this thread at how people are reacting to a letter that says exactly nothing we didn’t know and just goes “blame the council”. If that was reversed you know the thread would be full of posts about how “idiots push the PR”.
We’re all just fans! There are no conspiracies, it’s just a giant clusterfuck and no one has all the pieces of the jigsaw.
Or is it she needs to drop them due to the cost and knowing she cant win?Surely people aren't really that stupid to not understand what is being asked. Of course if its as easy as you say then absolutely no reason for the council not to agree.
So they will get support and a deal at the ricoh with the legals?
Ah the conspiracy line again ha.
Its interesting you try and compare me as if I'm actually a sisu employee, ex sisu boss or actually have any basis for it
I post day in day out and go to as many games as physically possible and would regardless of who owns us.
I have made a point of not knowing or wanting to know anybody involved.
You don't have any basis for it other than the " don't look at this, look at that" approach. Back it up with comparisons at least.
The council needs to agree, but really not sure what they can do.
I haven’t read the local plan, but I’d expect housing to take up a lot of any development space that size. Would they be asked to nix a housing development for a third local stadium in the middle of a housing crisis?
Would they offer land? The council generally offers long leases rather than sell freeholds, are they asking for another tenant/landlord situation? Really?
As has been said they can’t offer changes to planning law. Infrastructure work maybe? That’s the most likely thing I can see. In the middle of austerity asking for cash to help a hedge fund is a tough sell.
Has it not been proven multiple times over the years?View attachment 11736
(Your image insert thing is annoying as hell on mobile and always inserts the image at the top)
Are you not claiming that there is some level of secret planning between groups going on? Specifically fans groups and CCC.
That’s the dictionary definition of conspiracy.
This is not proven, so it’s a theory.
It’s a conspiracy theory.
That’s not a pejorative. That’s just what it is.
Has it not been proven multiple times over the years?
Who cares if it means they get dropped. Lets just have the council agree, draw a line under everything and move on.Or is it she needs to drop them due to the cost and knowing she cant win?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?