cracked me up mate :claping hands:Sat through God knows how much council waffle to hear a statement that didn't say anything new.:facepalm:
No explanation why no agreement on CVA causing 10 point deduction - that is what Councils do best
Who put "significant" in the title - looks like no news to me
Keep seeing this, but I don't understand.
Last missive from the council was "blah blah blah, if we haven't heard anything from Sisu after Christmas we're moving on".
This is "We've had no contact, we're moving on"
Don't see how that's not saying anything new. Maybe we all assumed they'd move on, but surely confirmation is hardly "no news".
Would be like saying when Sisu announce the ground location "Well, nothing new here, we knew they were going to build a ground".
When is this Judicial review taking place? Havent heard nothing since it was put up for review in November...
May............
PWKH has been in the media quite and on here a few times in the last 2-3 months and said that ACL have moved on and are set to thrive without the football club.
The Nii Lamptey interview with with council officials said that they don't sell assets.
Nothing was ever going to happen before the JR.
To me, it's just like any political statement, it says a lot without saying a lot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The first part made me laugh a bit; "continue our transformation to become a truly competitive city - not just on a national stage but on an international one, too."
We're a long way off being a competitive City on the international stage, especially since the motoring industry left us.
I'm not surprised to see them moving on. In a way, I'm glad they've made this stance. I just hope SISU / OTIUM continue to take theirs with their intentions. Wouldnt be surprised to see the Ricoh become an outdoor exhibition centre now; an outside version of the NEC solely for concerts etc, which I think the model was always based on; never as a football stadium
Ps, just heard a clip on the radio. Nice to hear Dierdre Barlow doing the narrating for Anne
I will be in the future.
They probably have a CPO In common.
Moved on my arse. You don't move on by leaving the "door open".
I think this gives the go ahead to ACL to pursue other alternatives. I'd put a roof on it .
CCC aren't ACL. Not heard the Nii Lamptey interview, but that's always been the case that the council don't sell land they lease it (probably why Joy is asking for that).
This is just a statement, to the entire council, that as of now we're not spending any more time on it. Not that we'll be OK, or that we might move on later. But that's it. Done. Moved on. Ball is in Sisu's court.
If it wasn't made then the assumption would be that talks are ongoing IMO.
But I see your point, maybe I'm a little more used to political language so read this stuff differently.
Moved on my arse. You don't move on by leaving the "door open".
The first part made me laugh a bit; "continue our transformation to become a truly competitive city - not just on a national stage but on an international one, too."
Moved on my arse. You don't move on by leaving the "door open".
CPO? :thinking about:
Made me laugh the other day driving along the A45 from BHX to Coventry to see loads of electronic signs saying something like:
"Working to improve your City"
Then changing to:
"May be delays"
Chronic Pulmonary obstruction ,common among heavy smokers ,brings on a bit of a baritone voice.
Is that for the death island over pass?
Will improve the flow but will obviously cause delays.
I think that up to today, ACL have not been given the green light to pursue any business that might interfere with CCFC matches.
This enables them to look elsewhere and perhaps gives an indication to other interested parties that there is an empty stadium available.
Realistically I think this will drag on to the end of the season when the JR is over (?)
It must be difficult to manage this, particularly if you know in reality no stadium can be built.
ANY business in a similar situation would look at the options. How long do ACL put up with business threats and games.
I can't see the club surviving this conflict.
SISU desperately need to make a statement. They're not usually slow to make one when they get made to look bad in the press so the silence could be seen as an indication they don't know how to spin their way out of the revelations of the last few days. More than one representative of SISU very clearly stated they were in talks with 2 local councils about the new ground. Either at least 2 of the councils are lying (and I'm sure SISU would have let us know if this was the case before you even consider repercussions for the councils in question) or SISU have been found outright lying in a way that's very difficult to spin their way out of.
This statement from CCC will put more pressure on SISU, the council are saying we're moving on, get on with building your ground. Ball now very firmly in SISUs court and they don't seem to know what to do with it.
Will be very interesting to see what SISUs next statement does say when it eventually appears.
Is that for the death island over pass?
Will improve the flow but will obviously cause delays.
Just been on CWR it's just a statement from Ann Lucas, that we (the Council) must move on, hardly worth the build up
The bloke who missed his meeting made me laugh though, like any bird is going to have an affair with him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?