Scg meeting notes from Thursday (1 Viewer)

Nick · Oct 17, 2016

letsallsingtogether said:
I know you represent them

Money is good what can I say.

skybluebeduff · Oct 17, 2016

letsallsingtogether said:
I know you represent them

Tries to at least.

skybluebeduff · Oct 17, 2016

Nick said:
Money is good what can I say.

So the some of the Maddsion money has fallen into your pocket, gotcha

SkyBlueZack · Oct 17, 2016

oucho said:
Must have missed that, what do you mean?

It was sarcasm. Aimed at when Gilbert led CCFC fans on to promote his new book. Still I imagine he's a hero of yours.

Skyblueweeman · Oct 17, 2016

oucho said:
Must have missed that, what do you mean?

I think he meant 3 weeks...

oucho · Oct 17, 2016

Reading those minutes it seems like Mr Strange is implying that the only legitimate thing to is to express concerns via the SCG email not march, chant sisu out or throw piggies. Or am i misreading that?

Captain Dart · Oct 17, 2016

oucho said:
Reading those minutes it seems like Mr Strange is implying that the only legitimate thing to is to express concerns via the SCG email not march, chant sisu out or throw piggies. Or am i misreading that?

I think he is going to be terribly terribly disappointed. :angelic:

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

Rusty Trombone said:
Any idea why Fisher is still involved when he claims he hasn't taken any money for 18 months?

Must say I was surprised at that comment. Haven't previous accounts have salaries to directors on them. Why would he take on all this much hassle for no reward?
The only reason I would do that was if my own money was tied up in it. Or I would make a massive bonus if I got the club to breakeven point or promoted.

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

Nick said:
Money is good what can I say.

You've been paid in the last 18 months????

Deleted member 5849 · Oct 17, 2016

dongonzalos said:
Must say I was surprised at that comment. Haven't previous accounts have salaries to directors on them. Why would he take on all this much hassle for no reward?
The only reason I would do that was if my own money was tied up in it. Or I would make a massive bonus if I got the club to breakeven point or promoted.

Or... if this doesn't get sorted out in some way, whether it's his fault or not he's not exactly going to get another job in football, is he?

oucho · Oct 17, 2016

SkyBlueZack said:
It was sarcasm. Aimed at when Gilbert led CCFC fans on to promote his new book. Still I imagine he's a hero of yours.

When did Gilbert lead CCFC fans on? What's your problem with him? Seems alright to me.

Generally Midfield · Oct 17, 2016

Not sure I understand a word of it. Fisher being typically clear as mud about sisu-ccfc relationship and spouting all the usual bs. trust pretending not to be anti-sisu when they clearly are and then ask for a meeting with seppala to put forward ideas they've spent 2 years planning but for which they haven't got any money - can't really blame her for saying no. the scg chairman sounds like a sisu mouthpiece. whole things seems like a bit of a joke.

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

So I assume the trust could set up some regular meetings with Mr Fisher now.
I don't feel that the majority of the SCG members represent my feelings or the feelings of the majority of fans. The trust does and so regular meetings between Mr fisher and the trust would be great.

It's looks like the BPA was discussed for 30 seconds before the side show deflection regarding the trust.

Did the question about going on CWR get answered?

Come SBT board members get meetings arranged ASAP.

Deleted member 5849 · Oct 17, 2016

dongonzalos said:
regular meetings between Mr fisher and the trust would be great.

FWIW I agree.

Reckon they'd need a bigger venue, with reinforced glass?

But yes, he's openly said he's happy to turn up to Trust open meetings so, they should take advantage of this. Could actually help communication between board and fans, couldn't it.

stupot07 · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
FWIW I agree.

Reckon they'd need a bigger venue, with reinforced glass?

But yes, he's openly said he's happy to turn up to Trust open meetings so, they should take advantage of this. Could actually help communication between board and fans, couldn't it.

Perhaps they should host it in the memorial park and TF could borrow the bullet proof Popemobile?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Captain Dart · Oct 17, 2016

stupot07 said:
Perhaps they should host it in the memorial park and TF could borrow the bullet proof Popemobile?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I could make a fortune selling rotten tomatoes at an event like that!

oucho · Oct 17, 2016

it's ok, as he says "we have a website and we use that," so why use any other forum at all (other than SCG) to communicate with fans?

thekidfromstrettoncamp · Oct 17, 2016

Wherever it is a ducking stool would be a good idea if he told a lie in he would go either he would get very wet or we would learn one hell of a lot

martcov · Oct 17, 2016

Is TF right that the Trust haven't handed in their accounts for 3 years? If so, that is really unprofessional. As is not marking your letter as 'private and confidential'. Same as an advisor from another EFL director. If you are doing any business with SISU you have to be perfect - look at what happened to others who have dealt with them ( e.g. CCC and Higgs ). Plus, even if you mark the letter as confidential, you can assume it may be read by others, although not commented on.

Plus, the Butts is back at 15000, which implies that maybe Steve is right that this forum is being monitored ( TF seems to be following opinions on here ).

colin101 · Oct 17, 2016

thekidfromstrettoncamp said:
Wherever it is a ducking stool would be a good idea if he told a lie in he would go either he would get very wet or we would learn one hell of a lot

Think we could use the old Witches Ducking stool technique for Tim, dunk him and if he doesn't drown he's a Witch (or Warlock) and we don't believe him

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

Also odd one from Mr strange.
When TF was asked when will the legal action stop. We can't get anywhere whilst it's going on.
As a Coventry why would Mr strange defend Joy Seppalla's right to carry on with the legal action.

It was just defeated legal action it was pummelled then three appeal judges agreed with the high court judge.

4 very senior judges said the legal action had no merit.

If the legal action is holding the club back why would anyone as a Cov fan want it to confinue.

Very bizzare

Deleted member 5849 · Oct 17, 2016

dongonzalos said:
As a Coventry why would Mr strange defend Joy Seppalla's right to carry on with the legal action.

I bet Ched Evans is glad he didn't heed everyone's advice to give up until the truth came out...

thekidfromstrettoncamp · Oct 17, 2016

Martcov if the forum is being monitored there not taking notice cause their still here

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
I bet Ched Evans is glad he didn't heed everyone's advice to give up until the truth came out...

I think his solicitors would have told him not to bother. If a high court judge found him guilty then 3 of the most senior judges in the country rejected his appeal saying the first judges decision was right on so many different levels.

thekidfromstrettoncamp · Oct 17, 2016

I think the big difference is SUSI will not take NO as answer no matter how many times as I believe Ched only appealed once. SUSI do not know the meaning of no unless they are the ones saying it.

italiahorse · Oct 17, 2016

dongonzalos said:
Must say I was surprised at that comment. Haven't previous accounts have salaries to directors on them. Why would he take on all this much hassle for no reward?
The only reason I would do that was if my own money was tied up in it. Or I would make a massive bonus if I got the club to breakeven point or promoted.

Probably only does a few hours a week, usually on match days.
Blokes and arse and these minutes prove it. Can't even be bothered to turn up and tell him.

italiahorse · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
I bet Ched Evans is glad he didn't heed everyone's advice to give up until the truth came out...

He had new evidence. Sisu just keep peddling the same old stuff.
However a few still believe it and keep posting on their behalf.

Deleted member 5849 · Oct 17, 2016

I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.

If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.

If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?

It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.

Captain Dart · Oct 17, 2016

Ironic indeed!

italiahorse · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.

If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.

If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?

It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.

CCFC will not gain either way.
CCFC are however being prevented from planning their future.
They are toxic to deal with while Sisu continue for years.

Deleted member 5849 · Oct 17, 2016

italiahorse said:
CCFC will not gain either way.

We'd have gained oif Richardson and Robinson hadn't agreed a confidentiality deal...

Moff · Oct 17, 2016

italiahorse said:
He had new evidence. Sisu just keep peddling the same old stuff.
However a few still believe it and keep posting on their behalf.

Ironic coming from you, someone who keeps posting on Wasps behalf.

No one believes what SISU say, its just some read it differently to you. That's life.

dongonzalos · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.

If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.

If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?

It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.

I don't mind them taking the action but once a high putt judge and three of the most senior judges in country. Say what most thought in the first place.
There is no case to answer. They are not saying this is close to call or anything like that. It was an out and out no.
Then when others including TF are saying the legal action is holding us back.
That's when as a Cov fan I am wanting the action to stop.

If the council and Wasos are lying we would soon find out.
Also it saves our owners a waste of time and money

olderskyblue · Oct 17, 2016

Wow, there are so many things wrong with that meeting. I wonder, as it's supposed to be a discussion about the match day experience, why the chairman didn't stop Tim as he went way outside the "rules of engagement" and then suggest he took this up separately with Steve, but no, he joined in on the attack. Incredible. It deflected away from a lot of other issues though eh?

I do wonder what the finances of the trust has to do with the match-day experience, and really, it might have been prudent for Steve to just tell Tim that he would refer it back to the Trust, as he cannot respond on their behalf now.

It is a bit rich when TF questions you're accounts though, or maybe they're in as much of a "mess" as CCFC's, that when sorted, seemed to have the pieces in different positions, but positions that fitted in perfectly for administration. (Although the trust should have submitted accounts really)

skybluetony176 · Oct 17, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.

If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.

If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?

It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.

I find it hard to believe that it hasn't already reached its conclusion given that four judges who have considered all the arguments are in unison with saying no case to answer. Any continuation of legal action seems to be an exercise in measuring how many times SISU have to hear it before they stop.

Scg meeting notes from Thursday (1 Viewer)

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency