Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Rico h Arena Move Will Break Partnerships (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter torchomatic
  • Start date Oct 12, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last

Neutral Fan

Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #36
Rusty Trombone said:
I'll be more interested in knowing how they are getting on, and if they do some cheap tickets for schools I'll probably take the kids to watch, but ultimately I want Cov to best the best team in Cov, and I hope they get a chance to reach their potential.
Click to expand...

This kind of comment makes me wonder why I didn't take my kids with cheap tickets when CCFC were playing at Sixfields.

Oh wait...I have principles on this sort of thing....
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #37
NFL 1920

1920 APFA standings

  • talk
  • edit
WLTPCTDIVPFPASTK
Akron Pros 8031.0006–0–31517T2
Decatur Staleys1012.9095–1–216421T1
Buffalo All-Americans911.9004–1–125832T1
Chicago Cardinals622.7503–2–210129T1
Rock Island Independents622.7504–2–120149W1
Dayton Triangles522.7144–2–215054L1
Rochester Jeffersons632.6670–115657T1
Canton Bulldogs742.6364–3–120857W1
Detroit Heralds233.4001–35382T2
Cleveland Tigers242.3331–4–22846L1
Chicago Tigers251.2861–5–14963W1
Hammond Pros250.2860–341154L3
Columbus Panhandles262.2500–441121W1
Muncie Flyers010.0000–1045L1


Err, who? Who? Who? Who?


NFL 1930

TeamPWLTPCT
Green Bay Packers141031.769
New York Giants171340.765
Chicago Bears14941.692
Brooklyn Dodgers12741.636
Providence Steam Roller11641.600
Staten Island Stapletons12552.500
Chicago Cardinals13562.455
Portsmouth Spartans14563.455
Frankford Yellow Jackets184131.222
Minneapolis Red Jackets9171.125
Newark Tornadoes121101.091

8 of those teams no longer exist, or have moved AND completely changed names.

1950.

Chicago Cardinals. Now the Arizona Cardinals
LA Rams. Now the St Louis Rams
New York Yanks. No longer exist
Baltimore Colts. Now Indianoplis Colts

Not saying it is right, just saying over there it is the norm and acceptable. They even have franchise players within their teams too for God's sake. Completely different model.

I'm sure if in Brazil or Argentina teams moved cities and changed allegiance there would be civil war.

US sport is very much about franchising and following the money. Over here it is (or has been) more about locality, community, heriatge, belonging and local rivalry.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #38
We've had Allsop franchised out to us. Franchising doesn't work.
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #39
Neutral Fan said:
This kind of comment makes me wonder why I didn't take my kids with cheap tickets when CCFC were playing at Sixfields.

Oh wait...I have principles on this sort of thing....
Click to expand...

It's not the same situation, although I could never rule out ever being a hypocrit, I think everyone is at times in their lives.

You could argue I'm a hypocrit now, as I give money to SISU yet I want them out, it's a quandary, but life is full of them.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #40
Rusty Trombone said:
It's not the same situation, although I could never rule out ever being a hypocrit, I think everyone is at times in their lives.

You could argue I'm a hypocrit now, as I give money to SISU yet I want them out, it's a quandary, but life is full of them.
Click to expand...

Things have changed. Football owners used to be local people, with an afinity or link to their clubs, quite often being fans themselves.

It's all changed now and I dare say an awful lot of owners do not care much for the fans of their clubs at all.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #41
People weren't so understanding a year ago.


Rusty Trombone said:
It's not the same situation, although I could never rule out ever being a hypocrit, I think everyone is at times in their lives.

You could argue I'm a hypocrit now, as I give money to SISU yet I want them out, it's a quandary, but life is full of them.
Click to expand...
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #42
torchomatic said:
People weren't so understanding a year ago.
Click to expand...

Some people were less understanding, in a situation that isn't exactly the same. That will be case in every situation, some people refuse to buy Nestle products, some people only buy fair trade.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #43
Bennets Afro said:
I live in Nuneaton and have been in the pub all day and i'll say is this!.... The amount of people that were looking forward to premiership rugby on their doorstep was frightening. People who I've known a long time all of a sudden are rugby fans and can't wait for the first game.

I gave them a dressing down in morals and ethics. their response. I just love rugby and its closer than leicester!

For me i hope this whole wasps thing come back to sting them in the ass and fails more then our temp home in northampton. I think it would be brilliant to spend so much money on a franchise and for it to fail!!!!
Click to expand...

I must admit I know a few myself. But I think it will wear off for the most part. I think everyone I've heard say it is a neutral and not necessarily a Rugby fan. The true Rugby fans I do know have sworn allegiances to their current club. Being from Rugby that tends to be lions (although not many), Saints or Tigers. Mainly the latter. I can't see them picking up too many fans from the Rugby area, geography may be a big factor in this but on the whole true Rugby fans are loyal to the team they already follow. No different to us lot with CCFC, I doubt you'd find anyone on here change to Man U if they moved to the area.
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #44
letsallsingtogether said:
So what happens if Cov get promoted and Wasps get relegated (or allowed to)?
Click to expand...

Would never happen - WASPS would pull out their loan players before then

Similar to Cov RFC and Broadstreet
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #45
skybluetony176 said:
I doubt you'd find anyone on here change to Man U if they moved to the area.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be so sure.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #46
Nick said:
I wouldn't be so sure.
Click to expand...

Me neither.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #47
skybluetony176 said:
I must admit I know a few myself. But I think it will wear off for the most part. I think everyone I've heard say it is a neutral and not necessarily a Rugby fan. The true Rugby fans I do know have sworn allegiances to their current club. Being from Rugby that tends to be lions (although not many), Saints or Tigers. Mainly the latter.
Click to expand...

Tony, what side of Rugby are you on? I know more Saints here than those who support the Leicester Pussycats or whatever their name is
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #48
Nor me.

Otis said:
Me neither.
Click to expand...
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #49
Oh, I get that. I get the "light switch" views/morals/attitudes of people like r_b, Spider, MMM, Dongo, Italia and to some extent, you and may others. SISU move City to Northampton (switch on outrage). The Council move a team 82 miles (switch off outrage). This place is chockablock with double-standards. It always has been.

The refreshing thing though is posters like LAST, BHSB, Duffer et al who have stuck their head above the parapet and said "hold on, the Council is wrong here". The still hate SISU with a passion but they have the intelligence to realise that what the council are doing is out of order. People seem to really struggle with that simple concept; criticising the Council or ACL doesn't mean you love SISU. No one does. No one want them here.

The Council are not and never have been above criticism. And they are so wrong on the Wasps issue.

Rusty Trombone said:
Some people were less understanding, in a situation that isn't exactly the same. That will be case in every situation, some people refuse to buy Nestle products, some people only buy fair trade.
Click to expand...
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #50
torchomatic said:
Oh, I get that. I get the "light switch" views/morals/attitudes of people like r_b, Spider, MMM, Dongo, Italia and to some extent, you and may others. SISU move City to Northampton (switch on outrage). The Council move a team 82 miles (switch off outrage). This place is chockablock with double-standards. It always has been.

The refreshing thing though is posters like LAST, BHSB, Duffer et al who have stuck their head above the parapet and said "hold on, the Council is wrong here". The still hate SISU with a passion but they have the intelligence to realise that what the council are doing is out of order. People seem to really struggle with that simple concept; criticising the Council or ACL doesn't mean you love SISU. No one does. No one want them here.

The Council are not and never have been above criticism. And they are so wrong on the Wasps issue.
Click to expand...

I agree with some of your points, and if I thought the circumstances were exactly the same, then I think more people would be outraged. Not as many though, because generally you get more outrage if something affects someone, rather than based on principles.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #51
torchomatic said:
Oh, I get that. I get the "light switch" views/morals/attitudes of people like r_b, Spider, MMM, Dongo, Italia and to some extent, you and may others. SISU move City to Northampton (switch on outrage). The Council move a team 82 miles (switch off outrage). This place is chockablock with double-standards. It always has been.

The refreshing thing though is posters like LAST, BHSB, Duffer et al who have stuck their head above the parapet and said "hold on, the Council is wrong here". The still hate SISU with a passion but they have the intelligence to realise that what the council are doing is out of order. People seem to really struggle with that simple concept; criticising the Council or ACL doesn't mean you love SISU. No one does. No one want them here.

The Council are not and never have been above criticism. And they are so wrong on the Wasps issue.
Click to expand...

Over and Over again we see people commenting about double standards and hypocrisy, It's not valid because for the most part people weren't up in arms about us being moved to Northampton because a sports team was being ripped from it's community. We were all up in arms because OUR! sports team was being ripped from it's community. It's hard to get outraged about something (that I agree with you is wrong) when it doesn't affect you (i dont mean wasps coming here doesn't affect us, I mean wasps being moved from wycombe doesn't affect us) and there are a million more outrageous things happening in the world much more worthy of our anger.

The response will probably be that I expected outrage from other fans for our move, I personally didn't expect this at all though I did desire it but for the most part we got almost none from the vast majority of clubs, A Song from Arsenal, some nice support from the real Dons but not really much else.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #52
torchomatic said:
Oh, I get that. I get the "light switch" views/morals/attitudes of people like r_b, Spider, MMM, Dongo, Italia and to some extent, you and may others. SISU move City to Northampton (switch on outrage). The Council move a team 82 miles (switch off outrage). This place is chockablock with double-standards. It always has been.

The refreshing thing though is posters like LAST, BHSB, Duffer et al who have stuck their head above the parapet and said "hold on, the Council is wrong here". The still hate SISU with a passion but they have the intelligence to realise that what the council are doing is out of order. People seem to really struggle with that simple concept; criticising the Council or ACL doesn't mean you love SISU. No one does. No one want them here.

The Council are not and never have been above criticism. And they are so wrong on the Wasps issue.
Click to expand...


I would say most people understand why the council did the deal, but that doesn't mean they give their unqualified support.

The council shouldn't have done the deal. The very least they should have done was to have consulted the football team, the rugby team and all the associated fans groups.

If they were to consider a franchise it should have been the very last resort and I don't believe that is the case here. They didn't have to sell to Wasps, they chose to. If they had no other choice then things might have been a little different and people may have felt a little different.

I'm sure then people would still say that the franchising was wrong but that every other avenue had been explored and there was very little choice in the matter.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #53
Noggin said:
Over and Over again we see people commenting about double standards and hypocrisy, It's not valid because for the most part people weren't up in arms about us being moved to Northampton because a sports team was being ripped from it's community. We were all up in arms because OUR! sports team was being ripped from it's community. It's hard to get outraged about something (that I agree with you is wrong) when it doesn't affect you (i dont mean wasps coming here doesn't affect us, I mean wasps being moved from wycombe doesn't affect us) and there are a million more outrageous things happening in the world much more worthy of our anger.

The response will probably be that I expected outrage from other fans for our move, I personally didn't expect this at all though I did desire it but for the most part we got almost none from the vast majority of clubs, A Song from Arsenal, some nice support from the real Dons but not really much else.
Click to expand...


This is the reason why I don't feel any outrage and just find the whole situation saddening.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #54
Otis said:
I would say most people understand why the council did the deal, but that doesn't mean they give their unqualified support.

The council shouldn't have done the deal. The very least they should have done was to have consulted the football team, the rugby team and all the associated fans groups.

If they were to consider a franchise it should have been the very last resort and I don't believe that is the case here. They didn't have to sell to Wasps, they chose to. If they had no other choice then things might have been a little different and people may have felt a little different.

I'm sure then people would still say that the franchising was wrong but that every other avenue had been explored and there was very little choice in the matter.
Click to expand...

The same could be said that people understand why SISU moved us though, don't have to agree with it but can understand why.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #55
Nick said:
The same could be said that people understand why SISU moved us though, don't have to agree with it but can understand why.
Click to expand...

but there were no valid reasons for moving us.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #56
Moff said:
Tony, what side of Rugby are you on? I know more Saints here than those who support the Leicester Pussycats or whatever their name is
Click to expand...

The pussy cat dolls side obviously
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #57
Noggin said:
but there were no valid reasons for moving us.
Click to expand...

At the time SISU said it was about the survival of the club, in the same way that Wasps owners are saying now.

If you accept that Wasps owners can decide where their club should play, then you've accepted that model for everyone - you can't then complain when it happens to our club.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #58
Nick said:
The same could be said that people understand why SISU moved us though, don't have to agree with it but can understand why.
Click to expand...

Think it would be a tiny minority.

We had a stadium here in Coventry, our home town. There was simply no reason to move away.

Sisu can say this and ACL can say that, but a short term agreement could have been arranged for us to remain at the Ricoh and we all know that it could.

It is different circumstances to Wasps, but then that's not the issue of franchising.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #59
duffer said:
At the time SISU said it was about the survival of the club, in the same way that Wasps owners are saying now.

If you accept that Wasps owners can decide where their club should play, then you've accepted that model for everyone - you can't then complain when it happens to our club.
Click to expand...

I've already said I think moving wasps is wrong though that it doesn't outrage me because there are so many much more outrageous things in the world that deserve my outrage more.

Sisu were lying though when they said the move was for the survival of the club, there were, no, zero, none valid reasons for moving us to northampton.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #60
duffer said:
At the time SISU said it was about the survival of the club, in the same way that Wasps owners are saying now.

If you accept that Wasps owners can decide where their club should play, then you've accepted that model for everyone - you can't then complain when it happens to our club.
Click to expand...


But that's bollocks. They were trying to distress ACL. Sisu acted in Sisu's interest, not the club's. They don't give two hoots about our survival.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #61
Noggin said:
I've already said I think moving wasps is wrong though that it doesn't outrage me because there are so many much more outrageous things in the world that deserve my outrage more.

Sisu were lying though when they said the move was for the survival of the club, there were, no, zero, none valid reasons for moving us to northampton.
Click to expand...

Absolutely spot on. Nail on head.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #62
Bennets Afro said:
I live in Nuneaton and have been in the pub all day and i'll say is this!.... The amount of people that were looking forward to premiership rugby on their doorstep was frightening. People who I've known a long time all of a sudden are rugby fans and can't wait for the first game.

I gave them a dressing down in morals and ethics. their response. I just love rugby and its closer than leicester!

For me i hope this whole wasps thing come back to sting them in the ass and fails more then our temp home in northampton. I think it would be brilliant to spend so much money on a franchise and for it to fail!!!!
Click to expand...


You need to get a different group of friends mate.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #63
Otis said:
NFL 1920

1920 APFA standings


  • talk
  • edit
W
L
T
PCT
DIV
PF
PA
STK
Akron Pros
8
3
1.000
6–0–3
151
7
T2
Decatur Staleys
10
1
2
.909
5–1–2
164
21
T1
Buffalo All-Americans
9
1
1
.900
4–1–1
258
32
T1
Chicago Cardinals
6
2
2
.750
3–2–2
101
29
T1
Rock Island Independents
6
2
2
.750
4–2–1
201
49
W1
Dayton Triangles
5
2
2
.714
4–2–2
150
54
L1
Rochester Jeffersons
6
3
2
.667
0–1
156
57
T1
Canton Bulldogs
7
4
2
.636
4–3–1
208
57
W1
Detroit Heralds
2
3
3
.400
1–3
53
82
T2
Cleveland Tigers
2
4
2
.333
1–4–2
28
46
L1
Chicago Tigers
2
5
1
.286
1–5–1
49
63
W1
Hammond Pros
2
5
.286
0–3
41
154
L3
Columbus Panhandles
2
6
2
.250
0–4
41
121
W1
Muncie Flyers
1
.000
0–1
45
L1


Err, who? Who? Who? Who?


NFL 1930

Team
P
W
L
T
PCT
Green Bay Packers
14
10
3
1
.769
New York Giants
17
13
4
.765
Chicago Bears
14
9
4
1
.692
Brooklyn Dodgers
12
7
4
1
.636
Providence Steam Roller
11
6
4
1
.600
Staten Island Stapletons
12
5
5
2
.500
Chicago Cardinals
13
5
6
2
.455
Portsmouth Spartans
14
5
6
3
.455
Frankford Yellow Jackets
18
4
13
1
.222
Minneapolis Red Jackets
9
1
7
1
.125
Newark Tornadoes
12
1
10
1
.091

8 of those teams no longer exist, or have moved AND completely changed names.

1950.

Chicago Cardinals. Now the Arizona Cardinals
LA Rams. Now the St Louis Rams
New York Yanks. No longer exist
Baltimore Colts. Now Indianoplis Colts

Not saying it is right, just saying over there it is the norm and acceptable. They even have franchise players within their teams too for God's sake. Completely different model.

I'm sure if in Brazil or Argentina teams moved cities and changed allegiance there would be civil war.

US sport is very much about franchising and following the money. Over here it is (or has been) more about locality, community, heriatge, belonging and local rivalry.
Click to expand...

Portsmouth Spartans no longer exist as Harry spent all transfer fees recieved on his dog. Allegedly.

WM
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #64
Noggin said:
Over and Over again we see people commenting about double standards and hypocrisy, It's not valid because for the most part people weren't up in arms about us being moved to Northampton because a sports team was being ripped from it's community. We were all up in arms because OUR! sports team was being ripped from it's community. It's hard to get outraged about something (that I agree with you is wrong) when it doesn't affect you (i dont mean wasps coming here doesn't affect us, I mean wasps being moved from wycombe doesn't affect us) and there are a million more outrageous things happening in the world much more worthy of our anger.
Click to expand...

If SISU decide to move us from Coventry once more, because they cant now get the Ricoh, it would have a huge effect on us and I take it those not currently outraged will find it in themselves to turn on their outrage again.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #65
Moff said:
If SISU decide to move us from Coventry once more, because they cant now get the Ricoh, it would have a huge effect on us and I take it those not currently outraged will find it in themselves to turn on their outrage again.
Click to expand...

yes we will and we will be right too and if you can't understand the reasons why and why that isn't hypocrisy then there isn't really much point discussing it.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #66
Moff said:
If SISU decide to move us from Coventry once more, because they cant now get the Ricoh, it would have a huge effect on us and I take it those not currently outraged will find it in themselves to turn on their outrage again.
Click to expand...

But Coventry have somewhere to play IN Coventry. Wasps weren't even playing in their home city and have changed grounds 3 times. I'm not defending that and I still think franchising is wrong, but it is different.

I am not outraged about the Wasps move, but would be totally outraged if Sisu move us again.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #67
Noggin said:
yes we will and we will be right too and if you can't understand the reasons why and why that isn't hypocrisy then there isn't really much point discussing it.
Click to expand...

Of course I understand the reasons. It was a hypothetical question, and just highlights some of the concerns of people at the moment. I didnt expect you to see that
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #68
Otis said:
But Coventry have somewhere to play IN Coventry. Wasps weren't even playing in their home city and have changed grounds 3 times. I'm not defending that and I still think franchising is wrong, but it is different.

I am not outraged about the Wasps move, but would be totally outraged if Sisu move us again.
Click to expand...

Are you not even a little bit outraged by the council whingeing about us moving 34 miles away, then welcoming Wasps with open arms?

WM
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #69
Otis said:
But Coventry have somewhere to play IN Coventry. Wasps weren't even playing in their home city and have changed grounds 3 times. I'm not defending that and I still think franchising is wrong, but it is different.

I am not outraged about the Wasps move, but would be totally outraged if Sisu move us again.
Click to expand...

We could go round in circles, but as a result of the Wasps sale, I fear this could give SISU all the excuse they need to look at options out of the City for our future home. They may not though and we could be just fine...like we continue to be under their stewardship...hold on.....
 

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #70
Just so I understand the terminology people are using, is SISU, in trying to distress ACL by moving CCFC to Northampton temporarily, Franchising?

You see, I just thought they were just using my club as a bargaining chip as a means to get the Ricoh on the cheap, so as to be able to get a return on investment for their investors................
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?