Wyken Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
And yet Man City with a pending 115x charges are still getting away with things...
And Chelsea too!
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
And yet Man City with a pending 115x charges are still getting away with things...Everton and Nottingham Forest expect to be told on Monday that they have breached the rules.
Everton and Nottingham Forest are braced for charges TODAY
TOM COLLOMOSSE AND LEWIS STEELE: Everton and Nottingham Forest are expecting to be informed that they have been charged with breaking Premier League spending rules on Monday.www.dailymail.co.uk
And Chelsea?After all this, I don't see how they can't harshly punish Man City without the whole thing looking like a huge farce.
Forgot to mention them!And Chelsea?
they haven't got away with anything? it's still being investigatedAnd yet Man City with a pending 115x charges are still getting away with things...
And Chelsea too!
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
but if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -they haven't got away with anything? it's still being investigated
if we don't go up this year at least they will give us a big allocationbut if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -
but if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -
Take away parachute payments from anyone who gets deducted?
Straight to the one-team Man City League Super Variety HourStraight to League 2.
Those arms thrown to the air just dramatising the pathetic looking for the foul by Trafford!Fanny.
Fanny.
I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.Are Everton in the shit they are in because they think they are a big club? They might be a big club support wise but success on the field is not something they have achieved in a long time.
Forest over spent in the 1st year back up. If they had sold Johnson 2 months before they did they would be OK. Normally money spent on ground improvements/builds are excluded from whst was spent but the PL are refusing Everton's claim on money paid for new stadium as apparently it isn't obvious it was spent solely on the new stadium.I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.
I think they've been under special measures due to their recent issues so god knows how they've fallen foul of the regs if that is the case.
I'm confused how forest are there, aren't these things done over 3 years (I'm assuming in the Prem)?
Fair enough, I thought they did it over a 3 year period was allForest over spent in the 1st year back up. If they had sold Johnson 2 months before they did they would be OK. Normally money spent on ground improvements/builds are excluded from whst was spent but the PL are refusing Everton's claim on money paid for new stadium as apparently it isn't obvious it was spent solely on the new stadium.
The way it works is that a club can be charged for the same year more than once as it can be in more than 1 3 year period and that is happening to Everton with this new charge. I'm not sure what the year is in question.Fair enough, I thought they did it over a 3 year period was all
(Something like a club is able to loose £105M over 3 years without penalty (which is mental)).
What Forest did the first season up was mental and it sounds like Everton are accounting creativity...
Just that one payment for the transfer to Spurs being just too late due the time dea done apparently.players preference for spurs holding up the deal while the had one agreed.I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.
I think they've been under special measures due to their recent issues so god knows how they've fallen foul of the regs if that is the case.
I'm confused how forest are there, aren't these things done over 3 years (I'm assuming in the Prem)?
All this falling on the floor to waste time has gone to far now and it has gone all the way down to kids football. They need to put a clock on these keepers when the ball his held by them the fourth official presses a button and it goes onto the stadium clock after six seconds a direct free kick on the edge of the box is given. I reckon within a couple of weeks it’s gone away.
I assumed it had gone, why do they not enforce it?The '6 second' Law is still in the Laws of the Game but referees are advised against enforcing it.
I assumed it had gone, why do they not enforce it?
I'm all for referees being allowed some flexibility, but straight up advising refs to ignore some laws because you personally disagree with the punishment is bizarre and clearly a sign of something going badly wrong higher up the chain of command.I know refs have been advised against enforcing it as it is felt that the punishment (a free kick inside the penalty area) is too severe.
Guess that's to help offset their consistent FFP breachMC trying to get 5mloan fee and £135 k a week paid in full for Phillips.🫣
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?