Welcome to Sky Blues Talk!

You're currently viewing the forum as a guest. Join thousands of fellow Coventry City fans today!

Newcastle United Saudi Takeover

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 7943
  • Start date Start date
Yes but Coventry City isn’t her only project. Barnsley owner is top of the list but the group owns another 6 clubs I think
Speaking of which has there been any indication from Newcastles new owners are going to go on a Man City / Chelsea style spending spree? Just because they've got it doesn't necessarily mean they'll be chucking it at Newcastle.
 
This supposed increase in club value is a nonsense, complete bollocks but it makes a good headline.

These clubs have no right to the owners wealth but the owner has the right to the clubs wealth ...... not the same thing at all. The club is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. In this case £305m. The owners may decide to put funds in but the club cannot assume it is their right.

Complete rubbish to appropriate the billions to each club
 
Speaking of which has there been any indication from Newcastles new owners are going to go on a Man City / Chelsea style spending spree? Just because they've got it doesn't necessarily mean they'll be chucking it at Newcastle.
Well they want to buy Inter too so would be pretty amusing if after all this they just used Newcastle as a feeder club.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 
Speaking of which has there been any indication from Newcastles new owners are going to go on a Man City / Chelsea style spending spree? Just because they've got it doesn't necessarily mean they'll be chucking it at Newcastle.

There is already talk of them buying Kane and Mbappe in January (I suppose all the big names will now be linked)
 
The whole 'cans' thinking is cringing - tossers.
 
You are probably right, they will wait until the summer.

not going to happen either

the club seems more realistic and are talking 10 year plans to get to that level
 
If they want to keep from overstepping the FFP rules, then it’s a very gradual process. Something their “fans” seem to be forgetting.
 
If they want to keep from overstepping the FFP rules, then it’s a very gradual process. Something their “fans” seem to be forgetting.
Not sure they have to because under Ashley they made a profit and have been sold with a positive bank balance. Under FFP they can lose something ridiculous like £135m over 3 seasons so they can probably splash out a considerable amount in January and before next season. It won't be easy to attract top players without qualifying for European competition and it won't be easy to attract a top manager with the squad they have. Will probably have to be a gradual process upgrading players and managers as necessary.
 
The ship sailed ages ago. Jealousy in some cases, hypocrisy in others.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Exactly this - what the 'big' clubs are afraid of is that somebody else is going to get their nose in the Champions League trough, and that one of them will miss out as a result. It's naff all about football, fair competition, and they are taking a stance akin to that of themselves not wanting to redirect any of the PL income to support the clubs in the leagues below. Money, and self interest. Nothing else. I'm glad it's happened if it upsets the 'cartel'
 
Exactly this - what the 'big' clubs are afraid of is that somebody else is going to get their nose in the Champions League trough, and that one of them will miss out as a result. It's naff all about football, fair competition, and they are taking a stance akin to that of themselves not wanting to redirect any of the PL income to support the clubs in the leagues below. Money, and self interest. Nothing else. I'm glad it's happened if it upsets the 'cartel'

Forgetting the other clubs for a minute, we’ve now got a quasi state owned club in the league, and not a particularly benevolent one. Is that no cause for concern in its own right?
 
So Norwich will want a competitive championship next year so will be waiving their parachute payments, if they are that bothered they should try for new owners themselves.

At least only one of them has been involved in organised murder
 
Forgetting the other clubs for a minute, we’ve now got a quasi state owned club in the league, and not a particularly benevolent one. Is that no cause for concern in its own right?

it’s private enterprise so in the real world it happens
 
it’s private enterprise so in the real world it happens
But there’s no point comparing it to real world private enterprise. If it was just real world business we’d have franchise teams moving all over the place like the US of A

Football is supposed to be different. Not sure for how much longer
 
But there’s no point comparing it to real world private enterprise. If it was just real world business we’d have franchise teams moving all over the place like the US of A

Football is supposed to be different. Not sure for how much longer

it hasn’t been different since 1992
 
Football hasn’t been in the real world for a long time

Well I’m some ways it has - the company I worked for made profit about twice in 20 years and many suitors were prepared to pump billions in
 
Well I’m some ways it has - the company I worked for made profit about twice in 20 years and many suitors were prepared to pump billions in

How many other industries have an equivalent to the ‘football creditors’ rule?
 
Their fans are utterly deluded. Expecting signings of Haaland, Salah, Bellingham in January.
 
Just had a bloke on itv talking about it. Apparent football blogger.

Came on saying how the takeover was amazing and then the other guy said about some of the negatives and he shit himself and did a quick u turn.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom