GIMOC
Well-Known Member
gladly do time for anyone who lay a finger on my wife or daughter
maybe that makes me a ‘hero’ but couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t
Last edited:
I bet your wife and daughter would love that, what a hero leaving them without a dad and a husband for 20+ years.
and you keep yours in the clouds, fella!
What about your wife and daughter? Would they be happy with you abandoning them to instead spend time with a bunch of dudes in prison for years?gladly do time for anyone who lay a finger on my wife or daughter
maybe make that makes me a hero but couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t
...because you can’t counter discuss anything
Every fucking time manGenuine question, how many people would be saying it's out of order if Tommy Robinson started laying into a police woman and the same happened to him or would people be sharing it with glee finding it hilarious?
...if Tommy Robinson
What about your wife and daughter? Would they be happy with you abandoning them to instead spend time with a bunch of dudes in prison for years?
so these 4 people think it’s funny that groups can go and get stations closed down because someone got a arrested and threatening police if justice is not served then they’ll take things into their own hands
what a bunch of idiots and stand by what I say. shame others on here having for the balls to stand up for themselves
As far as I can see not one person is sticking up for them or saying they didn't deserve a kicking.
What the sweet f*ck has he got to do with this?
Nah, those 4 people are laughing at the hilarious twitter handle.
Yes if it was within their police's rules and remit.Do you think it would have been legitimate to shoot them?
Do you think it would have been legitimate to shoot them?
I've said that stamping on his head was excessive force, so what are the odds of me thinking shooting him in the face would be proportionate force?
In my world I'd do everything to make sure I'd support my wife and kid to make sure they are okay and be there for them rather than bailing on them to make myself look like a hero.don’t know what world you live in but in mine, if anyone touched my kids or wife. couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do something
I’m talking about while their violence was occurring.
If they did then they'd have built a statue of the victim.Do you think it would have been legitimate to shoot them?
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.so you think it’s normal for groups to protest outside police stations threatening them because someone got arrested?
The issue is, if it wasn’t for Twitter and alike, we wouldn’t know what issues are out there
sets a precedent when groups feel they can go to a police station threaten staff, get the station closed
I don’t want to live in a country like that, clearly you do
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.
The twitter thing is just conspiracy theory bullshit. This idea that the news doesn't get reported unless some random on twitter posts about it. Yet the vast majority of examples given to support this are things that are reported in the press, just not in a way that could lead to problems securing convictions or causing trials to collapse. All its doing is whipping up a storm.
Its pretty obvious that when people post things in 'real time' what they really want is an opposing group to turn up and for it all to kick off so they can turn around and say 'told you do'.
You need to stop this thing that if everyone doesn't completely agree 100% with your point of view they are happy to let people go round beating up women or attacking the police.
In a crowded room, with the offenders grappling with the police officers? Obviously not, what a terrible idea.
Didn’t violence start before that?
I'm not sure, but how can you safely shoot someone when they're grappling with police officers (or anyone)?
And anyway, police just can't shoot an unarmed man. I can't believe this is even a question tbh.
Police can never shoot an unarmed man in the uk? Are you sure?
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.
The twitter thing is just conspiracy theory bullshit. This idea that the news doesn't get reported unless some random on twitter posts about it. Yet the vast majority of examples given to support this are things that are reported in the press, just not in a way that could lead to problems securing convictions or causing trials to collapse. All its doing is whipping up a storm.
Its pretty obvious that when people post things in 'real time' what they really want is an opposing group to turn up and for it all to kick off so they can turn around and say 'told you do'.
You need to stop this thing that if everyone doesn't completely agree 100% with your point of view they are happy to let people go round beating up women or attacking the police.
Well, they can. But lawfully?
If they are unarmed then it would have to be exceptional circumstances for the police to lawfully shoot them.
This kind of situation is literally what tasers are for.
The law states does it not that it is legitimate if they believe they are under threat lethal force is justifiable.
Drawing weapons would have entirely justified given the level of violence.
Drawing weapons would have entirely justified...
still waiting on all these protests you referred to outside police stations following someone arrest
That's unacceptable.don’t say that @Ccfcisparks will come after you. he likes sticking up for woman beaters
Thousands gather in support of Tommy Robinson and for counter-demonstration
A counter-protest, organised by Stand Up to Racism, has also set off on a march through central London.www.independent.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?