Manchester Airport Incident (3 Viewers)

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
I bet your wife and daughter would love that, what a hero leaving them without a dad and a husband for 20+ years.

gladly do time for anyone who lay a finger on my wife or daughter

maybe that makes me a ‘hero’ but couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t
 

Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
Genuine question, how many people would be saying it's out of order if Tommy Robinson started laying into a police woman and the same happened to him or would people be sharing it with glee finding it hilarious?

Let's not forget it was an airport as well, it's different circumstances.

Hopefully they get sent down for a good while along with that dodgy lawyer who was trying to get them compo. If their mum still tries to claim a copper hit her, she can go down for contempt as well.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SBT

Joy Division

Well-Known Member
gladly do time for anyone who lay a finger on my wife or daughter

maybe make that makes me a hero but couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t
What about your wife and daughter? Would they be happy with you abandoning them to instead spend time with a bunch of dudes in prison for years?
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
...because you can’t counter discuss anything

If there's one poster on here that tells me it's worth actually talking to you about the issues involved with this, sound. All I see is you shouting at people and not reading anything they type, which isn't the sign of someone interested in a conversation.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Genuine question, how many people would be saying it's out of order if Tommy Robinson started laying into a police woman and the same happened to him or would people be sharing it with glee finding it hilarious?
Every fucking time man
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
What about your wife and daughter? Would they be happy with you abandoning them to instead spend time with a bunch of dudes in prison for years?

don’t know what world you live in but in mine, if anyone touched my kids or wife. couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do something
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
What if Tommy Robinson ran over towards Block 15 to take a corner for Sheffield United, would you applaud him then? PROBABLY NOT EH checkmate
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
so these 4 people think it’s funny that groups can go and get stations closed down because someone got a arrested and threatening police if justice is not served then they’ll take things into their own hands

what a bunch of idiots and stand by what I say. shame others on here having for the balls to stand up for themselves

Nah, those 4 people are laughing at the hilarious twitter handle.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Yes!!! A Tommy Robinson mention!


Steve Bannon Bingo GIF
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
As far as I can see not one person is sticking up for them or saying they didn't deserve a kicking.

Do you think it would have been legitimate to shoot them?
 

Nick

Administrator
What the sweet f*ck has he got to do with this?

Because it's the same as usual, you have people who will be saying something is out of order when it happens to somebody but then you change the person and their views suddenly changed.

It was at an airport ffs, he was lucky to not be shot in the head.
 

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
Nah, those 4 people are laughing at the hilarious twitter handle.

shows how bad the video is then. you can’t talk about the video but laugh at a Twitter handle

again shows the mentality of you and your ilk on here

wont discuss anything that goes against your narrative
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I've said that stamping on his head was excessive force, so what are the odds of me thinking shooting him in the face would be proportionate force?

I’m talking about while their violence was occurring.
 

Joy Division

Well-Known Member
don’t know what world you live in but in mine, if anyone touched my kids or wife. couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do something
In my world I'd do everything to make sure I'd support my wife and kid to make sure they are okay and be there for them rather than bailing on them to make myself look like a hero.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
so you think it’s normal for groups to protest outside police stations threatening them because someone got arrested?

The issue is, if it wasn’t for Twitter and alike, we wouldn’t know what issues are out there

sets a precedent when groups feel they can go to a police station threaten staff, get the station closed

I don’t want to live in a country like that, clearly you do
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.

The twitter thing is just conspiracy theory bullshit. This idea that the news doesn't get reported unless some random on twitter posts about it. Yet the vast majority of examples given to support this are things that are reported in the press, just not in a way that could lead to problems securing convictions or causing trials to collapse. All its doing is whipping up a storm.

Its pretty obvious that when people post things in 'real time' what they really want is an opposing group to turn up and for it all to kick off so they can turn around and say 'told you do'.

You need to stop this thing that if everyone doesn't completely agree 100% with your point of view they are happy to let people go round beating up women or attacking the police.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
so to make sure I'm keeping up, if you sympathise with the officer that did the kicking and stamping but think there should be a way of making sure that's not seen to be accepted as 'good practice', and you're glad the Tw*ts who attacked them will serve time...

you're an apologist for wife beaters, an ostrich and Tommy Robinson needs to be talked about again?
 

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.

The twitter thing is just conspiracy theory bullshit. This idea that the news doesn't get reported unless some random on twitter posts about it. Yet the vast majority of examples given to support this are things that are reported in the press, just not in a way that could lead to problems securing convictions or causing trials to collapse. All its doing is whipping up a storm.

Its pretty obvious that when people post things in 'real time' what they really want is an opposing group to turn up and for it all to kick off so they can turn around and say 'told you do'.

You need to stop this thing that if everyone doesn't completely agree 100% with your point of view they are happy to let people go round beating up women or attacking the police.

say for instance.

please show me protests outside police stations of the night of an arrest in turn closing down a police station and making threats. please send me some links over the past couple of years. let me know how many you find. I’m not an idiot so don’t try to make fake claims

Videos are there for all to see. videos or the migrant hotels, muggings in streets etc… people see this not just on twitter but Facebook etc as a result why do you think reform are flourishing? Because people have had enough of being treated like idiots

The media only tell you half the story. social media has many downfalls but videos that are not AI are the news for many now
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
In a crowded room, with the offenders grappling with the police officers? Obviously not, what a terrible idea.

Didn’t violence start before that?
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Didn’t violence start before that?

I'm not sure, but how can you safely shoot someone when they're grappling with police officers (or anyone)?

And anyway, police just can't shoot an unarmed man. I can't believe this is even a question tbh.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure, but how can you safely shoot someone when they're grappling with police officers (or anyone)?

And anyway, police just can't shoot an unarmed man. I can't believe this is even a question tbh.

Police can never shoot an unarmed man in the uk? Are you sure?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
They're armed. Armed, armed with what? Err, bad breath, colorful language, feather duster - what do you think they're gonna be armed with? Guns, you tit!
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Police can never shoot an unarmed man in the uk? Are you sure?

Well, they can. But lawfully?

If they are unarmed then it would have to be exceptional circumstances for the police to lawfully shoot them.

This kind of situation is literally what tasers are for.
 

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
Protests outside police stations aren't exactly a new thing so not sure how this is in any way setting a precedent. As with any protest not sure you can pick & choose what is allowed, assuming they are non-violent of course. Just because I don't support what someone is protesting for doesn't mean I feel they should be denied their right to protest, that's a very slippery slope. If anyone protesting breaks the law you deal with them accordingly.

The twitter thing is just conspiracy theory bullshit. This idea that the news doesn't get reported unless some random on twitter posts about it. Yet the vast majority of examples given to support this are things that are reported in the press, just not in a way that could lead to problems securing convictions or causing trials to collapse. All its doing is whipping up a storm.

Its pretty obvious that when people post things in 'real time' what they really want is an opposing group to turn up and for it all to kick off so they can turn around and say 'told you do'.

You need to stop this thing that if everyone doesn't completely agree 100% with your point of view they are happy to let people go round beating up women or attacking the police.

still waiting on all these protests you referred to outside police stations following someone arrest
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well, they can. But lawfully?

If they are unarmed then it would have to be exceptional circumstances for the police to lawfully shoot them.

This kind of situation is literally what tasers are for.

The law states does it not that it is legitimate if they believe they are under threat lethal force is justifiable.

Drawing weapons would have entirely justified given the level of violence.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The law states does it not that it is legitimate if they believe they are under threat lethal force is justifiable.

Drawing weapons would have entirely justified given the level of violence.

Absolute nonsense.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Drawing weapons would have entirely justified...

It was stopped with tasers and restraints. You want police pulling guns in crowded public spaces to shave a few seconds off the process? jfc
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

Users who are viewing this thread

Top