cc84cov
Well-Known Member
More chance than playing this negative shite getting lucky against a team who scored 2 goals a far from open play
we got lucky against both teams mentioned
Just had a strange phone call (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Grendel
- Start date
we got lucky against both teams mentioned
D
Deleted member 11652
Guest
More chance than playing this negative shite getting lucky against a team who scored 2 goals a far from open play
Yeah because the old system was working so well
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
It needed tightening he’s took it too far and killed all our attack,it’s also no coincidence now he’s let Kelly back in we are more solid.The entire budget was on 532 play it and use Hamer Kelly and sheaf...Shipley and O’Hare are impact subs at best
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
I am, it was more the more look where we were 3 seasons ago. Championship team now and have earned it on merit
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
More chance than playing this negative shite getting lucky against a team who scored 2 goals a far from open play
I don’t think it’s sustainable but you can’t dismiss the upturn in results
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Kelly has made a huge difference mate we have to play wing backs and play our 3 best midfielders we can’t have sheaf on the bench ahead of Shipley as we want to play a system it isn’t gonna last we’ve got lucky he’s done the entire budget 532 we leaked goals due to individual errors and
Now he’s took it way too far to the point we nearly lost to a team last night who have scored 2 from open play all season
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
The only way we are going to stay up this year is by playing how we have the last few games. It's not going to be pretty, or comfortable, but its the only way we are going to stop conceding goals and sneak results.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
Again there is an awful lot of luck you are attributing to our results - unlucky teams usually end up getting relegated
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
You say all attacking threat is killed but in another post you say O’Hare missed 2 sitters last night
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
1 header he should of scored the other 2 he bottled it,that system last night with Shipley and O’Hare won’t keep us up
mr_monkey
Well-Known Member
Almost like he changes his mind about things depending on what other people say isn't it
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Find where I said sitters I’ve said he bottled them 2 chances in the 6 yard boxAlmost like he changes his mind about things depending on what other people say isn't it
look on the matxh thread I said he bottled it and shit himself all night and today
he’s massively over rated on here
mr_monkey
Well-Known Member
Yet we've got 4 points using it, are unbeaten in 4 games and are 4 points clear of the relagation zone, is working ok to me
We have to except that this season we won't be playing the fluid attacking football of last season due to the quality of the opposition, we tried it and ended up shipping a load of goals
It's not going to be pretty but the only aim this season is to stay up and it doesn't matter how we get it done
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
What did we play against Norwich boosh? With a rotated side as well I might add?
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Let’s see where it takes us me personally I don’t see it keeping us up I don’t see how we will score enough in it,Using a system with 2 AM who are not good enough is it gonna cut it it’s gonna get shown up soon we’re better now as Kelly is back it was individual errors thst done the other system,
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
We should of lost last night and against Brum this luck won’t last much longer you’ll all see
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
So we don’t need Kenny Jackett now ?
Yes G has had a transformation he now forgets he ever made that comment.
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Our luck will run out soon wait and see
Birmingham & Derby are piss poor sides and we was very lucky not to lose both
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
We only equalised because Robins bothered to go 2 up top at the end. We are really going to find it hard to win games like this.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
What we played before was relying on us scoring 3 goals to win a game. What we’re playing now relies on conceding no more than 1 a game.
Neither are sustainable and have faults, a mix of both would be ideal, but you can’t deny even if you think it’s through good fortune results have been better
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Interesting against Rotherham who play 532 and press high and hard if we have no outlet to win headers we could be in trouble Saturday I think we lose to them
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
From the Derby forum's match thread -
Not sure we were unlucky, they had the clearer chances. Draw about right for me.
Don't think we can realistically say we deserved a win
Lucky to get a point.
lets face it everyone can say hard done too but that game was even. We didn't deserve a win any more than them. They had a goal chalked off a header they should have scored and other chances.
We didn't look like scoring, then out of the blue we did.
And avoiding bias on both sides -
Not to depress you guys anymore but get rid of any of that internal bias that tells you we deserved to win. They nudged it in the expected goals department.
steve cooper
Well-Known Member
It seems to me, this system is only to stop the rot and get the goals against sorted out so that the players don't lose too much confidence.
And it has worked.
If we can pull away from the relegation zone we can go back to a more attacking system with the knowledge that we have an alternative system if too many goals start going in again.
Wycombe are undoubtedly worse off than us but a similar system has seen them lose only 1 in the last 5.
And it has worked.
If we can pull away from the relegation zone we can go back to a more attacking system with the knowledge that we have an alternative system if too many goals start going in again.
Wycombe are undoubtedly worse off than us but a similar system has seen them lose only 1 in the last 5.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
Are you a bot?
stupot07
Well-Known Member
They had only won 1 of their last 7 coming into the game against us.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
bawtryneal
Well-Known Member
Yep and if you speak to any intelligent Sheffield United fans they are realistic about where they sit in the football pyramid. They over performed last season, have spent no money this season, so will get relegated
Are they happy, NO. But they are realistic about progress
3 seasons ago we were messing around in League 2. Where is our "real position" in the league table based on investment, turn over and future potential. I would suggest it is about where we are now. Mid table Championship at best
Would I like us to win the Champions League, of course.
I live in and around all the footballing fraternity of South Yorkshire and fully understand "things" as you put it but unless you are a child you have to be realistic about your dreams.
DannyThomas_1981
Well-Known Member
I hear what you are saying STP.
This is my counter view though for what it's worth:
-We played 3 at the back on Saturday, finally with a fit Kelly and Dabo. Through this system, Dabo and Giles excelled and we made the top team in the league look very very ordinary. Norwich were very lucky to escape with a draw. In my view it was our most complete performance of the season.
-We switched to 4-5-1 last night. Through this system we completely negated two of our best players in Dabo and Giles. We looked disjointed and gave up control for significant periods of the game. Walker was isolated. We made the worst team in the division look good. In this game, we were very lucky to escape with a draw against the worst team in the division.
As you say no system is perfect. But with the players we have in our squad I know which system I prefer and I know which game we performed best in.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
At least their fans are bias to say deserved win
Ours are bias to say we are shit lmao
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
The box got us promoted
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
DannyThomas_1981
Well-Known Member
I agree with that 85. My preference for this team and the players we have is a 3-5-2 with a midfield 3 of Kelly/Hamer/Sheaf or even Kelly/Hamer/O'Hare for certain game times. I know that O'Hare missed the target yesterday but I still rate him highly.
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
O'Hare is an excellent player. He can't currently finish his dinner but that can be worked on.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Nah
