I'm not going to stand on the hill every week but if the talk of a protest there at the Sky game comes good I will certainly be there for that game.
Feel it's a bit off to critise people for going to Northampton and protesting, people feel the need to do something and should be free to do that without other fans telling them they're doing the wrong thing. If we're going to be critical of any fans those that choose to fund SISU through attendance at the Sixfields games are way higher up on my list than those who chose to exercise their right to peacefully protest.
Weren't you on here not long ago saying we should only protest in London as that will be the only way to get media attention? There was plenty of media attention at the weekend and a fair amount of it featured those fans on the hill so what they are doing is effective in highlighting our situation.
Going to NTFC and protesting on a hill is somehow endorsing the move and will make other fans think it's OK to attend games? I'm pretty sure most other fans have the intelligence to realise that Coventry City should be in Coventry not Northampton, there's a little clue in the name for those that are slightly slow on the uptake.
How much press coverage is staying away going to get as the season progresses, I would think not much. However if even a couple of hundred show up to protest at the Sky game there is a good chance that will get coverage.
Travel to Northampton to protest about playing in Northampton.
Best way to get your message across is by nobody turning up, they'll soon realise at some point.
Think you're missing the point, the protest is not about playing in Northampton as such, if we genuinely had nowhere to play I'm sure the vast majority would be more than happy we had Northampton to play at. People who choose to go to NTFC but not go in are wanting to show that they are willing to travel to Northampton and it's not just a case that they can't be bothered but that its actually that they are not prepared to fund our owners.