Chuffing right . I'd pull their nails out first one by one . Make the fuckers suffer .
With respect that is bullshit. Do you condone a statement that wants fisher and seppella to die in excruciating agony? Yes or no?
Add to them the cancer and rape comments and you realise some people need to have a word with themselves.Christ the last three posts are awful.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Add to them the cancer and rape comments and you realise some people need to have a word with themselves.
Why should I care if these two individuals die in excruciating agony or not?
Absolute honesty, I would struggle to feel anything if they did.
I dont actively wish them dead, but I wouldn't care if they did die.
Chuffing right . I'd pull their nails out first one by one . Make the fuckers suffer .
What classy well educated supporters we possess who clearly have a sense of perspective in life.
But it's okay to hope that the tax payer and a children's charity get financially raped by overseas investors in a hedge fund. If you want to be the PC police I suggest you get all your morals and principles in the right place first, otherwise your just a hypocrite.
Businesses make gains and losses all the time - no comparisons. Anyway I don't like using words like rape in this context but given that the council and the charity have been abusing the club for years I think a bit of a fight back from the victim is a good thing.
By the way, I wouldn't condone the behaviour if its Lucas, mutton, PWKH either.
So do you condone it?
These are the fuckers who have given my club cancer well fuck them and in fact the whole lot of the sisu shit from ken the tan and whoever else has added to the disease lynch the fuckin lot
But it's okay to hope that the tax payer and a children's charity get financially raped by overseas investors in a hedge fund. If you want to be the PC police I suggest you get all your morals and principles in the right place first, otherwise your just a hypocrite.
Are you all alone , are you made of stone ? sisu out.Are you including Hoffman & Elliot as well? Or do they escape punishment as they had no idea what was going on at the club because they were tricked by the evil sisu?
So you are happy for the football club to be exploited then? Strange logic. It seems that when the club are being ripped off by ACL then 'it's only business', yet the same logic doesn't apply to the club wanting to escape from being exploited.
Well siad Martcov, i'm amazed people still don't see the real picture.Didn't the council step in to ensure the stadium got built? Weren't the club supposed to buy into ACL via Higgs at a later date? Didn't the club sell the F&B rights? If so, how was the club exploited? The club is now a different entity to the club run by local businessmen interested in Coventry ( and themselves ). It is a hedge fund who's sole purpose is to generate wealth and therefore, has no interest in the City of Coventry or soccer - apart from possible wealth creation in the Coventry area. So, please don't start the poor victim sketch. These people ( SISU ) are business educated people with a wealth of experience between them. If they have made a mistake by accepting the rental conditions through the purchase of CCFC, then they are certainly not victims, but have made a poor business decision, which they are now forced to correct as best they can. Doesn't help CCFC fans though.
So you are happy for the football club to be exploited then? Strange logic. It seems that when the club are being ripped off by ACL then 'it's only business', yet the same logic doesn't apply to the club wanting to escape from being exploited.
Didn't the council step in to ensure the stadium got built? Weren't the club supposed to buy into ACL via Higgs at a later date? Didn't the club sell the F&B rights? If so, how was the club exploited? The club is now a different entity to the club run by local businessmen interested in Coventry ( and themselves ). It is a hedge fund who's sole purpose is to generate wealth and therefore, has no interest in the City of Coventry or soccer - apart from possible wealth creation in the Coventry area. So, please don't start the poor victim sketch. These people ( SISU ) are business educated people with a wealth of experience between them. If they have made a mistake by accepting the rental conditions through the purchase of CCFC, then they are certainly not victims, but have made a poor business decision, which they are now forced to correct as best they can. Doesn't help CCFC fans though.
No. I'm not. What you and the other sisu apologist don't seem to be able to grasp is that the only people currently exploiting the football club is SISU.
I'll ask you the same question. So are you happy for the football club to be exploited then?
So you are happy for the football club to be exploited then? Strange logic. It seems that when the club are being ripped off by ACL then 'it's only business', yet the same logic doesn't apply to the club wanting to escape from being exploited.
I agree, surely acl.should have done better due dilligence and had better contracts to stop them from being broken like that?
I agree, surely acl.should have done better due dilligence and had better contracts to stop them from being broken like that?
But you seem happy with them as owners.
You reap what you sow.
I see you are keeping on thread... You only do due diligence when you are acquiring something, the contract existed. The consequences of a hedge fund manoeuvring out of the contract rather than continuing negotiations is 1000 paying customers in Northants and an utter shambles of a club. But you seem happy with them as owners.
You reap what you sow.
How much of it's own money did CCC put into the construction of the Arena? How much of this do you reckon they have recouped since if you take into consideration the F & B sales, car parking, naming rights etc? As I have said before, if Hoffman/Haskell had managed to successfully takeover the club and then taken up the same stance as SISU, I am certain that the fundamentalists on here who demand 'militant action' would already have their pitch forks out for the council. Yet because it is SISU, they seem to forget that they should be wanting what is best for the football club.
I am surprised that you aren't singing the praises of Tesco for their part in the construction of the Ricoh?
Ok, maybe they could have researched sisu before allowing them to take it on?
Like I said, I don't believe this but it is just turning the other argument around.
I agree, surely acl.should have done better due dilligence and had better contracts to stop them from being broken like that?
I think that you need to look in the mirror to before you reinvented yourself.
ACL are poor innocent lambs who only want what is best for the football club. They were innocently led to slaughter and left to die. Grrrrr Grrrrrr
ACL are a stadium management company who only want what is best for their owners - CCC and Higgs ( Higgs was supposed to have been bought out by the football club ). The football club was an anchor tenant who only want what is best for the football club ( in theory - but SISU want their investment back, which is not necessarily what is best for the sporting side of the football club ). The football club was supposed to buy into ACL. Would the football club then have become a poor innocent lamb?
I haven't reinvented anything thanks. If you are suggesting I changed my position on Sisu you are wrong.
They simply have to be judged as a business on their performance. And they have been an utter disaster.
Ok, maybe they could have researched sisu before allowing them to take it on?
Like I said, I don't believe this but it is just turning the other argument around.
How much of it's own money did CCC put into the construction of the Arena? How much of this do you reckon they have recouped since if you take into consideration the F & B sales, car parking, naming rights etc? As I have said before, if Hoffman/Haskell had managed to successfully takeover the club and then taken up the same stance as SISU, I am certain that the fundamentalists on here who demand 'militant action' would already have their pitch forks out for the council. Yet because it is SISU, they seem to forget that they should be wanting what is best for the football club.
I am surprised that you aren't singing the praises of Tesco for their part in the construction of the Ricoh?
So you say it's ok for acl.to want the best for their owners but not for sisu?
So you say it's ok for acl.to want the best for their owners but not for sisu?
Exactly, and what's people obsession with sticking to one side and blindly following it from then on. See political voting for another example of this.
I originally supported Sisu and was grateful that they saved the club. I'm not embarrassed to admit that, many people were the same.
Now I can clearly see they have completely fucked it up and want them out.
Have I 'switched sides' or 're-invented myself'? No, I see what's going on and base my opinions and thoughts on that.
If sisu piled in, apologised to everyone and invested heavily in the club and brought us home, I'd be pleased with that and leave all the Sisu out stuff well alone.
I'm sure many on here would never be able to 'forgive' them regardless, but it will be their loss in the long run.
And there is no point bringing hindsight into it. In hindsight I wouldn't be supporting this shower of shite at all and I'd have capitalised the H in my username.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?