Hmmm I could see how that’s maybe a defence for breaking and entering in this case, not sure it’s adequate defence for attacking a policewoman with a sledgehammer. Sets a dangerous precedent.
Who would be a police officer
Has anyone read enough to know if they were charged and found not guilty for that
You'd expect it for that one at least.‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess
Unfortunately, we now live in a world where rules and laws seem to matter less and less.
Thanks‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess